Spoooonsnake

Funnily enough I said this with about twenty minutes left; Lennon was about a yard on the pitch screaming at the top of his voice, and I realised I hadn't seen Gary Parker or Steve Walford the whole match up till then. It was noticeable before Mjalby went that Lennon would be up, then Mjalby, then Parker and so on. Last night was the first time I thought maybe Lennon is out of his depth and having Mjalby alongside masked a lot of short comings. We've certainly got worse defensively since he went. And attacking we are so slow, predictable and pedestrian, every other team seems to be able to move the ball quickly, whereas we break, stop, check, cut in, look back, step over, play it backwards and then launch it aimlessly into the box where it hits the first defender or drifts out of play.

Ok genius, go and re read what I wrote, then tell me in what way am I claiming to be a super fan? I am still baffled as to how, when the EQUALISER goes in, not the WINNER, people leave in droves. Five minutes left, plus injury time and possibly extra time. So another potential 35 minutes, and penalties. Why leave then, en masse? Yes we were on the back foot by then, and extra time could have been embarrassing, but after the first leg and most of last night, where it was great being a Wanderers fan again, why leave at that point? Not criticising those who leave quickly for family or other reasons at full time, just wondering why anybody comes to a game where after 175 minutes against the more fancied team, and its just gone level again, they walk out? Does it make sense to you? Try reading, and then comprehending, before you type the typical sarcastic response.

This, with bells on! The mass exodus from round our normal seats in WSL when they equalised was embarrassing. We're drawing with five minutes to go plus injury time, with the potential for another half hour and penalties and you leave? Pathetic. Glory hunting bastards, don't bother coming next time.

On sale online now, just bought mine.