Site Supporter HomerJay Posted August 8, 2011 Site Supporter Share Posted August 8, 2011 i think SWP is decent and id have him in the team immediatly (on the right, petrov on the left) if petrov leaves next season, id be trying chungy or swp on the left. if it doesnt work swp can also play int he middle and possibly up front. basically, if hes available and affordable, buy him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didledee Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 i think SWP is decent and id have him in the team immediatly (on the right, petrov on the left) if petrov leaves next season, id be trying chungy or swp on the left. if it doesnt work swp can also play int he middle and possibly up front. basically, if hes available and affordable, buy him. This doesn't happen often, but I agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jules_darby Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Now I think SWP is plenty good enough for us...isolated purely to his ability, but what DD and Homo appear to be missing though is that we'd be employing 2 wingers Pretty much out and out wingers Our rather maligned full backs would probably not appreciate this The same goes for the oft villified Muamba (or this season maybe Pratley and Coco Pops) who was often forced out of position by having to stretch across to cover for the lack of tracking out wide. I see us getting a few tonkings this year if we stick to 4-4-2 game in, game out with those players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didledee Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 (edited) Well we could always go with the formation Brazil went with in the 2010 World Cup. Reo-Coker and Muamba[Melo and G.Silva] as the holders, Petrov and SWP each wing, M.Davies/Pratley through the centre/free roam with Davies up top, this away from home for me, we didn't really fair that much better with Taylor out left with Lee/Elmander right. Obviously this is just with what we have now, I'd prefer Klasnic in there and it to be different with a new striker and when Holden returns. Edited August 8, 2011 by Didledee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tarian1979 Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Dont play 4 4 2 away from home, its the simple answer. a) 4 4 2 at home got us a good points total last season, stick to it 4 5 1 away, means you can still play the two attacking wide men, as 2 of the 3 centre mids can help the dreadful full backs where needs be. we aint got many striking options so just play one centre forward away, be a bit more defensive minded and try and better last seasons shite away points total. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DazBob Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Well we could always go with the formation Brazil went with in the 2010 World Cup. Reo-Coker and Muamba[Melo and G.Silva] as the holders, Petrov and SWP each wing, M.Davies/Pratley through the centre/free roam with Davies up top, this away from home for me, we didn't really fair that much better with Taylor out left with Lee/Elmander right. Obviously this is just with what we have now, I'd prefer Klasnic in there and it to be different with a new striker and when Holden returns. This actually makes perfect sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didledee Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 This actually makes perfect sense. Are you being sarcastic or not, I can't tell because of the smiley, I'll put a fornmation image if you need it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tylswhite Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Coyle is trying to sign 2 strikers so 4-4-2 is almost nailed on for every game imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tarian1979 Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Coyle is trying to sign 2 strikers so 4-4-2 is almost nailed on for every game imo. Well we're suffer away from home as our defence aint good enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didledee Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Coyle is trying to sign 2 strikers so 4-4-2 is almost nailed on for every game imo. tylswhite, you're the president of itk, have you got any names, have you been sworn to secrecy? any news on SWP, is it N'gog and Jerome, Owen? Rasiak? Sturridge? Rivaldo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter HomerJay Posted August 8, 2011 Site Supporter Share Posted August 8, 2011 (edited) Now I think SWP is plenty good enough for us...isolated purely to his ability, but what DD and Homo appear to be missing though is that we'd be employing 2 wingers Pretty much out and out wingers Our rather maligned full backs would probably not appreciate this The same goes for the oft villified Muamba (or this season maybe Pratley and Coco Pops) who was often forced out of position by having to stretch across to cover for the lack of tracking out wide. I see us getting a few tonkings this year if we stick to 4-4-2 game in, game out with those players im not missing it at all. in terms of players for the same position i just dont care if we have too many players, its not my job to care. in terms of all too attacking, i agree, but coyle wants wingers. if thats the case, then id rather they be swp than chris eagles. Edited August 8, 2011 by HomerJay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DazBob Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Are you being sarcastic :: or not, I can't tell because of the smiley, I'll put a fornmation image if you need it In this instance I was being serious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jules_darby Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 im not missing it at all. in terms of players for the same position i just dont care if we have too many players, its not my job to care. in terms of all too attacking, i agree, but coyle wants wingers. if thats the case, then id rather they be swp than chris eagles. Let's assume we have a limited budget and could get one extra player in for that role(s wide right or left) only Given your stance that it's too attacking, would you not prefer a signing of a wide "midfielder"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Are you being sarcastic :: or not, I can't tell because of the smiley, I'll put a fornmation image if you need it I think it would help if you posted the fornmation image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didledee Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 I think it would help if you posted the fornmation image. Not sure if it'll work, wouldn't play this at home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piemon Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Not sure if it'll work, wouldn't play this at home. we play in Black away dont we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter HomerJay Posted August 8, 2011 Site Supporter Share Posted August 8, 2011 we'll shit um! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ani Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 we'll shit um! Assume the Stuart Pearce type formation is deliberate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SalfordOriginal Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 we'll shit um! If your wingers are cutting in like that, isnt it best for them to play on opposite wings? Copyright...Football Manager 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZiggyStardust Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 we'll shit um! Jay will still blame Jussi each time we concede Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter HomerJay Posted August 8, 2011 Site Supporter Share Posted August 8, 2011 Assume the Stuart Pearce type formation is deliberate? id gamble and try and sneak 12 on but the website was too clever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rembrandt Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Not sure if it'll work, wouldn't play this at home. We might have to if we don't get the strikers we need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Frandsen08 Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 just been told that he is in talks with OC later today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marple whites Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 just been told that he is in talks with OC later today. from a decent source ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Frandsen08 Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 from a decent source ?? aye he told me about tuncay and been good with the info previously Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts