no balls Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 agreed all this loves his country nonsense i'd prefer somebody to have an idea of right and wrong fcuk him He's proud of playing for his country, which is a good thing. I'm not proud of him representing our country though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tedmull Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 I like John Terry, great defender, I don't believe he is racist, and whats wrong with shagging someone's EX girl friend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter barryk32 Posted September 24, 2012 Site Supporter Share Posted September 24, 2012 The FA are cheeky fuckers in my view. He has been charged tried in a UK court of law, verdict was not guilty. Who do the FA think they are to say thats not good enough for them so they will charge him anyway. He might well be a horrible cunt but he's in the right over this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DazBob Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 The FA are cheeky fuckers in my view. He has been charged tried in a UK court of law, verdict was not guilty. Who do the FA think they are to say thats not good enough for them so they will charge him anyway. He might well be a horrible cunt but he's in the right over this one. I agree that the FA shouldn't be charging him if he's already been cleared in a court of law... but I also agree with NB, he knew this was coming so why wait until now to say they've made his position untenable? He should've done it as soon as the very day they charged him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted September 24, 2012 Moderators Share Posted September 24, 2012 The FA are cheeky fuckers in my view. He has been charged tried in a UK court of law, verdict was not guilty. Who do the FA think they are to say thats not good enough for them so they will charge him anyway. He might well be a horrible cunt but he's in the right over this one. because the FA aren't charging him with the offence he was tried for in the court Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted September 24, 2012 Moderators Share Posted September 24, 2012 I like John Terry, great defender, I don't believe he is racist, and whats wrong with shagging someone's EX girl friend. or ex wife fully agree but thats not what's being investigated, is it? and he's not great never has been great Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Frandsen08 Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 the fact he since was found not guilty and played for his country only with the FA hearing over him to now say he is done with his country, just adds to the fact that he is a mahoosive cunt. Cracking player though. Lescott, jagielka cahill are more than sufficient. Just need some yoof to really come through. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 Cahill will step up though, ready made replacement right there. Now whilst he's not a first choice at Chelsea, he won't. David Luiz is ahead of him there and just signed a new 5yr deal. Lescott & Jagielka are ahead of him for England. Lescott, rightly because of his performances in the Euros. Jagielka: fuck knows why? He's poor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MalcolmW Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 Now whilst he's not a first choice at Chelsea, he won't. David Luiz is ahead of him there and just signed a new 5yr deal. Lescott & Jagielka are ahead of him for England. Lescott, rightly because of his performances in the Euros. Jagielka: fuck knows why? He's poor. The logic of Cahill joining Chelsea was to make C-T a club and country combination. He appears to be third string at the club and the international pairing is now a thing of the past. When all 3 subs have been used and the GK gets injured or dismissed Jagielka is a sound replacement provided he is on the pitch.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Frandsen08 Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 Now whilst he's not a first choice at Chelsea, he won't. David Luiz is ahead of him there and just signed a new 5yr deal. Lescott & Jagielka are ahead of him for England. Lescott, rightly because of his performances in the Euros. Jagielka: fuck knows why? He's poor. Luiz when he goes wandering IMO is a liability. He really seems as though he could leave the back line at anytime and be caught in possession and seems to forget he is a central defender. I think as the season goes on cahill will become more of regular as he comes across as a bit more of a rock-steady defender and will become more of a regular for england. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonk Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 Get him back on loan? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DazBob Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Guilty! http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/19723020 Staggering. Presumably they had evidence that wasn't available in court..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leigh white Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Appealing, no wonder i cant get my appeal sorted out with Terry and that hook handed cunt clogging the tribunal system up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter HomerJay Posted September 27, 2012 Site Supporter Share Posted September 27, 2012 Guilty! http://www.bbc.co.uk...otball/19723020 Staggering. Presumably they had evidence that wasn't available in court..? how can this be different to what they found in court? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Carlos Posted September 27, 2012 Moderators Share Posted September 27, 2012 I'd be sacked in my job. JSL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Carlos Posted September 27, 2012 Moderators Share Posted September 27, 2012 It's occurred to me.. JT should be Scouse. Always the victim... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derek smalls Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 (edited) If I were him I`d ask one of my white team mates to call me a white bastard then i`d launch an official complaint to see what they did with it. Edited September 27, 2012 by derek smalls Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickbrown Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 I heard it's a slightly different charge and not the same burden of proof required as in the criminal case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Frandsen08 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 (edited) If I were him I`d ask one of my white team mates to call me a white bastard then i`d launch an official complaint to see what they did with it. Brilliant. Edited September 27, 2012 by Frandsen08 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter HomerJay Posted September 27, 2012 Site Supporter Share Posted September 27, 2012 If I were him I`d ask one of my white team mates to call me a white bastard then i`d launch an official complaint to see what they did with it. dont really want to pick at that scab, but thats not really the same is it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Carlos Posted September 27, 2012 Moderators Share Posted September 27, 2012 Genius. So you'd not only be a simpleton, you'd be a lying one too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Carlos Posted September 27, 2012 Moderators Share Posted September 27, 2012 Stan Collymore knows the score: 12 Barton handbags. 8 Suarez racism 4 Terry racism FA. Inept. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derek smalls Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 no, you`re right, carry on apologising for your colour.....as you were Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank_spencer Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 I heard it's a slightly different charge and not the same burden of proof required as in the criminal case. Eggsackerly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Carlos Posted September 27, 2012 Moderators Share Posted September 27, 2012 no, you`re right, carry on apologising for your colour.....as you were Aye ok. You are suggesting lying to test your hypothesis. The Terry incident happened i.e. wasn't made up. You carry on defending racism, as you were (backward). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.