Site Supporter Cheese 947 Posted March 21 Site Supporter Share Posted March 21 35 minutes ago, MickyD said: What the actual fuck? He's just pointing out that Astrology is obviously utter bollocks, because everything in space is moving in relation to everything else, so 'Star Signs' (which are based on the the position of the stars in the sky when you're born) should change over time - but they don't. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Traf 2,707 Posted March 21 Share Posted March 21 51 minutes ago, MickyD said: What the actual fuck? He's right. Astrology is bullshit. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Members MickyD 1,024 Posted March 21 Members Share Posted March 21 The ‘what the actual fuck’ was because asfuckingtrology was mentioned in the astronomy thread. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Site Supporter Cheese 947 Posted March 21 Site Supporter Share Posted March 21 14 minutes ago, MickyD said: The ‘what the actual fuck’ was because asfuckingtrology was mentioned in the astronomy thread. To be fair, it was mentioned in relation to an Astronomical observation. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Members MickyD 1,024 Posted March 21 Members Share Posted March 21 25 minutes ago, Cheese said: To be fair, it was mentioned in relation to an Astronomical observation. Which is like an equestrian publication pointing out that unicorns are like horned horses. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Site Supporter Winchester White 271 Posted March 21 Site Supporter Share Posted March 21 Correct and NdGT is like Prof Cox but with soul, he's the man! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Site Supporter Cheese 947 Posted March 21 Site Supporter Share Posted March 21 3 minutes ago, MickyD said: Which is like an equestrian publication pointing out that unicorns are like horned horses. It's not, because that would imply that the equestrian publication were acknowledging the existance of Unicorns. This is more like somoene saying "Despite the daily columns in virtually all of your newspapers telling you that unicorns exist - they don't - and here's the scientific proof..." Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Members MickyD 1,024 Posted March 21 Members Share Posted March 21 41 minutes ago, Cheese said: It's not, because that would imply that the equestrian publication were acknowledging the existance of Unicorns. This is more like somoene saying "Despite the daily columns in virtually all of your newspapers telling you that unicorns exist - they don't - and here's the scientific proof..." Did you say in another thread you don’t argue every point? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Site Supporter Cheese 947 Posted March 21 Site Supporter Share Posted March 21 1 hour ago, MickyD said: Did you say in another thread you don’t argue every point? No. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket 1,633 Posted March 23 Site Supporter Share Posted March 23 Some data from LHC might have yielded evidence of a 5th fundamental force of nature. If so some of previously thought bits of physics may need re writing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Site Supporter Spider 2,187 Posted March 23 Site Supporter Share Posted March 23 37 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Some data from LHC might have yielded evidence of a 5th fundamental force of nature. If so some of previously thought bits of physics may need re writing. I don’t know what the first 4 are. Do I need to watch them all first or can I just start at 5? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Site Supporter Spider 2,187 Posted March 23 Site Supporter Share Posted March 23 There’s an explanation in the Guardian here, but it seems to have been written in Klingon: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/mar/23/large-hadron-collider-scientists-particle-physics Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket 1,633 Posted March 24 Site Supporter Share Posted March 24 You didn't do physics or chemistry then? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Site Supporter Zico 1,836 Posted March 24 Site Supporter Share Posted March 24 12 hours ago, Spider said: There’s an explanation in the Guardian here, but it seems to have been written in Klingon: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/mar/23/large-hadron-collider-scientists-particle-physics Sounds like just another sigma to me Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kent_white 1,282 Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 Just in case we end up doing this again - can I say Quark Carlisle? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Site Supporter Zico 1,836 Posted March 24 Site Supporter Share Posted March 24 El Hadron Diouf Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket 1,633 Posted March 24 Site Supporter Share Posted March 24 Pavel SERNicek Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Site Supporter Cheese 947 Posted March 26 Site Supporter Share Posted March 26 SN11 is pencilled in to launch today. A test flight to 10km, and another vertical landing attempt. Could be anytime between now and 9pm, or it could be cancelled altogether. Exciting stuff. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Site Supporter Cheese 947 Posted March 26 Site Supporter Share Posted March 26 It's been cancelled. Bastard. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SatanGreavsie 613 Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 Helicopter on Mars now deployed and ready to go. Though it's a few days until it flies Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dimron 79 Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 46 minutes ago, SatanGreavsie said: Helicopter on Mars now deployed and ready to go. Though it's a few days until it flies Is that Winter Hill in the distance? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SatanGreavsie 613 Posted April 7 Share Posted April 7 This is pretty cool - the rover looking down at the copter. But I can't help thinking that if they turned the microphone on again all we'd hear is a chant of "you're gonna get your fuckin' head kicked in..." Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Traf 2,707 Posted April 7 Share Posted April 7 CGI bollocks, all of it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Site Supporter Francis Fogarty 52 Posted April 8 Site Supporter Share Posted April 8 12 hours ago, Traf said: CGI bollocks, all of it. I'm not saying it's all bollocks, but I find it easy to disbelieve since I saw a young bloke in Majorca do a picture like this using only a pan lid, some aerosol paints and a dirty rag. And he only wanted 20 Euros. "pan lid" in this instance not rhyming slang for a little kid. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.