Moderators Zico Posted July 1, 2016 Moderators Share Posted July 1, 2016 Didn't we play a 3-5-2? Probably as it was the formation of choice back then and don't recall Ince, Platt or gazza playing wide Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOWTUN BAKED Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Was it not a 3-4-1-2? Didn't they call it the Christmas tree formation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Alf Hartigan Posted July 1, 2016 Site Supporter Share Posted July 1, 2016 Was it not a 3-4-1-2? Didn't they call it the Christmas tree formation? That rings a bell. Was Mcmanaman the fairy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leigh white Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Was it not a 3-4-1-2? Didn't they call it the Christmas tree formation? We usually PRESENT the opposition with a win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MalcolmW Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 Was it not a 3-4-1-2? Didn't they call it the Christmas tree formation? Christmas tree is 4-3-2-1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naytch Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 I looked up the team for the Germany semi final, we didn't use any of our subs and had Ferdinand and Fowler on the bench as unused subs. Why the hell didn't they come on to take a penalty?! http://www.uefa.com/uefaeuro/season=1996/matches/round=224/match=52916/postmatch/lineups/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted July 3, 2016 Share Posted July 3, 2016 Christmas tree is 4-3-2-1. But it should really be 3-4-2-1, with the "3" as the base for the tree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts