Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Transfer Gossip


Ratwhite

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Leyther_Matt said:

A glorious failure might be the best thing all round. Not often teams go in to a lower division with a whole load of momentum behind them. 

That’s one of the most important things for me - stay up or not
Got to keep it going as long as poss to keep the fans and players interested and positivity into next season 

Edited by jules_darby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should probably concentrate on the here and now but my main worry is carrying on as we are, KH becoming toxic but leading us in L2 cos he has a record  of getting promoted from there and it all being a replay of the last few years at a lower level.

Edited by ErnestTurnip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, jules_darby said:

That’s one of the most important things for me - stay up or not
Got to keep it going as long as poss to keep the fans and players interested and positivity into next season 

Me too. And im liking casino"s positivity.  But part of me feels it might be under estimating Hilly"s job.

Stay up or go down though lets hope we still have the all in it together attitude we need. Its why i think its unfair for some of the criticism  of Hilly thats started and why someone like Wheater could help this season. Up and at em!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, ErnestTurnip said:

Would we not be better using Zouma/Edwards/Senior/Brockbank and giving them the experience, that would be more like building for the future rather than topping up a retirement fund.

But Hill doesnt want to use them.  He wants to use Wright and a 5.5" midfielder instead.  So Wheater is a far better alternative to either of them, he isnt an alternative to young defenders. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Johnnyrotten said:

But Hill doesnt want to use them.  He wants to use Wright and a 5.5" midfielder instead.  So Wheater is a far better alternative to either of them, he isnt an alternative to young defenders. 

I’d have Wheater back with a view to him getting involved in coaching defence, seems Hill and Flircroft can’t do that job so getting him back as player coach makes sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

I’d have Wheater back with a view to him getting involved in coaching defence, seems Hill and Flircroft can’t do that job so getting him back as player coach makes sense. 

He strikes me as the hill way or no way 

but yes wheater may want to go down that road of coaching and if so good place to start 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Happy to have Wheater back if it happens particularly at this level. We wouldn’t of been complaining about him if he hadn’t of gone to Oldham in the first place so no idea why people have an issue with him now 

re: Hill, yes he is hamstrung with his options at the minute but some of his decisions are bizarre. For me, he talks a better game than he’s showing at the min. 
 

he talked about getting the side buying in to how they work with and without the ball. Well, without the ball we’ve been abysmal in the last 5-6 weeks. So they’re either a) not yet getting it or b) doing it but it’s not good enough 

gossip about Clough too. I’d have him back 100%. With Crawford out I’d rather have Clough playing behind Murphy than Darcy. Darcy has some decent potential and could be a very good asset. What he lacks at the minute is creating opportunities and finishing. Clough pips him there so even if they’re marginal improvements, they’re what we need to turn results in our favour 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When you work on playing without the ball, it’s about shape, communication, when to go when to stay, when to press when to drop off, that all goes out of the cunting window when we go down to ten bastard men

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

I’d have Wheater back with a view to him getting involved in coaching defence, seems Hill and Flircroft can’t do that job so getting him back as player coach makes sense. 

That's an option I thought about too, we definitely need someone to help coach our defense.

I always thought it was a good idea to build your team from the back first to make you more solid and hard to beat, we seem to be building from the front first.

Edited by Blondi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Rudy’s Message said:

When you work on playing without the ball, it’s about shape, communication, when to go when to stay, when to press when to drop off, that all goes out of the cunting window when we go down to ten bastard men

It's easier to maintain it though if you bring on defensively-minded reinforcements to give yourself a bit of structure.

Hill didn't do that. Instead, he went very gung-ho. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
2 minutes ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

It's easier to maintain it though if you bring on defensively-minded reinforcements to give yourself a bit of structure.

Hill didn't do that. Instead, he went very gung-ho. 

Yeah his decisions at times have me scratching my head 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter

Hill said when he came, he wanted to play attacking football. I think we have seen that through formations, however we need to keep the ball better and make more chances, in addition to being better organized at the back.

If the latter gets sorted, I'm sure a bit more confidence would emerge that we can dominate and win games more comfortably than at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Wow, didn't he say the other day he wanted to stay?

Presumably some incomings on the way.

Don’t they all go back, does mot mean he’s not coming back, but to be honest he’s been average. Possibly clears way for Wheater to return. 

Edited by Mounts Kipper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

Don’t they all go back, does mot mean he’s not coming back, but to be honest he’s been average. Possibly clears way for Wheater to return. 

That’s a grim swap if that’s one for one imo. 
 

Happy to mix it up a bit as we deffo need new faces in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not bothered if Earl stays at Preston, it's looking likely that Chickson will be staying and Bunny shouldn't be far from fitness, so we should be covered at left back, we need to bring in some decent central defenders, so letting Earl go, isn't the end of the world imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.