Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Terror Attacks


Spider

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Not in Crawley said:

Been at work, just finished, apologies. If I’m a hooray Henry then two bed terraced houses in Bromley have certainly shot up. 

Anyway, what I’m rather boringly against is this whole, if you don’t agree with one hard party line you must be an apologist or appeaser.

Like very much most things there are various shades of grey and whilst I’m not sure she should be welcomed home - she was also a young girl and a British citizen. If she has committed crimes directly she must pay, and the matter of returnees is incredibly complex. Can a government render her stateless? 

The radicalisation of young people is a real issue as this case highlights - she needs to be questioned and ultimately prosecuted if found guilty of deeds done whilst supporting a terrorist organisation. 

      

Cut the shit Sherlock 

 

Yes or no ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, kent_white said:

Wanderersways day out anybody? :)

FB_IMG_1550265295581.jpg

I just don’t get why there has to be so many in one particular area?

And why do they have to be so big and dramatic and not inkeeping witn anything around it?

You need permission to build a fuckin conservatory or have a different coloured door on some new estates. Why are these gaffs different?

If they made em look like normal buildings I don’t think people would be arsed as much. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, gonzo said:

I just don’t get why there has to be so many in one particular area?

And why do they have to be so big and dramatic and not inkeeping witn anything around it?

You need permission to build a fuckin conservatory or have a different coloured door on some new estates. Why are these gaffs different?

If they made em look like normal buildings I don’t think people would be arsed as much. 

 

If you plot the areas they're around some of the poorest parts of town. 

I'm with you on the buildings though - some of them just look daft and out of context. Especially the white, gold and green ones. Next to a row of terraced houses and a cobbled street. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kent_white said:

If you plot the areas they're around some of the poorest parts of town. 

I'm with you on the buildings though - some of them just look daft and out of context. Especially the white, gold and green ones. Next to a row of terraced houses and a cobbled street. 

Not to worry In 20 years they’ll be in context with the area. 

Edited by Mounts Kipper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, gonzo said:

I just don’t get why there has to be so many in one particular area?

And why do they have to be so big and dramatic and not inkeeping witn anything around it?

You need permission to build a fuckin conservatory or have a different coloured door on some new estates. Why are these gaffs different?

If they made em look like normal buildings I don’t think people would be arsed as much. 

 

The Poles don't seem to mind any, they're pretty much the only white folk in these areas.

The worshippers tip up 10% or sommat of income to the building and upkeep.

I presume if all us white 'christian' (born) tipped up similarly we could build a fuckload of St Paul's type jobbies no-one would pitch up at bar christenings, funerals and weddings?

I went past the Supermosque on Blackburn Road t'other day - it's f*cking tiny...They should've bought St. Peter and Paul's, that'd have been one belting Minaret if they stuck dome on it...

Edited by Youri McAnespie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter
7 minutes ago, gonzo said:

I just don’t get why there has to be so many in one particular area?

And why do they have to be so big and dramatic and not inkeeping witn anything around it?

You need permission to build a fuckin conservatory or have a different coloured door on some new estates. Why are these gaffs different?

If they made em look like normal buildings I don’t think people would be arsed as much. 

 

In fairness it's not uncommon for religious buildings to be grandiose and domineering.

I suppose it's a symbol of power.

Many such buildings are mightily impressive too, just a pity that so much bollocks has come out of some of them over the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tonge moor green jacket said:

In fairness it's not uncommon for religious buildings to be grandiose and domineering.

I suppose it's a symbol of power.

Many such buildings are mightily impressive too, just a pity that so much bollocks has come out of some of them over the years.

That’s how the churches were originally....they made the poor people look up to them,god almighty and that bollocks.

 

Gonzo.....years ago on Daubhill, the mosques were originally back street things, usually situated in converted garages etc.....I know it well as my mate accidentally broke his nose on one :D

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, kent_white said:

If you plot the areas they're around some of the poorest parts of town. 

I'm with you on the buildings though - some of them just look daft and out of context. Especially the white, gold and green ones. Next to a row of terraced houses and a cobbled street. 

Spot on there pal re the poorest parts of town.

How many are seen in Lostock, the nicer parts of Heaton etc ?

Zero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, gonzo said:

I just don’t get why there has to be so many in one particular area?

And why do they have to be so big and dramatic and not inkeeping witn anything around it?

You need permission to build a fuckin conservatory or have a different coloured door on some new estates. Why are these gaffs different?

If they made em look like normal buildings I don’t think people would be arsed as much. 

 

Permission wise etc pal....just look to the local councils...enough said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Youri McAnespie said:

Do you reckon' when we start chucking our 10% in the pot for the building of  massive new churches and chapels etc. we'll get get told to piss off? 

I might change my tune if that's the case.

Youri....it’s not 10% they chuck in.

The 10% is probably the ABV of what you’re supping again.

Hope that helps.....chin chin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slowly but surely, you’re all turning.

Mick Brown admits now there’s a problem.....can’t be denied in all honesty can it ?

Jol fucked off in a strop after his “Paki” accusations at myself went down like a lead balloon

Micky D is a bigger closet racist than Elton John wasn’t a closet bummer :D

NiC......his silence admits guilt.

Kent has applied to Bolton Council for permission to fly the Swas him Sticker on his roof

Casino.....hmmm, he’s silent and not uttered his usual anti Semitic rants for a while.....hmmm indeed.

It's taken time, but the wheels are turning.

Enjoy the weekend you Nazis....and please thank us Visionaries one day,

Do zobaczenia ty cidaj

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Youri McAnespie said:

Unlike you I haven't got loads of Muslim mates and colleagues to check, so...anyhow, even with such folk to consult with, your idea of muzzie tithe is probably wrong.

QC Sherry is 14%, so wrong again.

Two wrongs don't make a right, goodnight.

I know exactly the contributions they make , please get your facts right you silly old sot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.