Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Politics


miamiwhite

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Reckon I might sign it, "love Nigel"

Without upsetting the left wing applecart, especially after last week, but it does seem this word is so out that it's back in......I just wish they'd make their minds up  🕺💣

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2020/feb/14/pete-buttigieg-protest-san-francisco-fundraiser-queer-activists

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter
3 minutes ago, miamiwhite said:

Without upsetting the left wing applecart, especially after last week, but it does seem this word is so out that it's back in......I just wish they'd make their minds up  🕺💣

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2020/feb/14/pete-buttigieg-protest-san-francisco-fundraiser-queer-activists

Perhaps the two 'fellas' should stand themselves?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, miamiwhite said:

Without upsetting the left wing applecart, especially after last week, but it does seem this word is so out that it's back in......I just wish they'd make their minds up  🕺💣

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2020/feb/14/pete-buttigieg-protest-san-francisco-fundraiser-queer-activists

Still intellectually wipes the floor with your spiritual hero everytime :) To be fair any of the remaining democratic candidates do :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
4 hours ago, kent_white said:

Still intellectually wipes the floor with your spiritual hero everytime :) To be fair any of the remaining democratic candidates do :)

Shambolic at best.

Can't see said 'spiritual hero' losing to any of those uninspiring pissweeds. Maybe Bloomberg has the best shot through sheer weight of money?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, bolty58 said:

Shambolic at best.

Can't see said 'spiritual hero' losing to any of those uninspiring pissweeds. Maybe Bloomberg has the best shot through sheer weight of money?

Probably not - I doubt many of the people voting for Trump are impressed by reasoned debate. They like the 'alpha male' type. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kent_white said:

Probably not - I doubt many of the people voting for Trump are impressed by reasoned debate. They like the 'alpha male' type. 

 

And a serious question - if these candidates are so intelligent (and some clearly are) you'd think they'd know how to become electable in the USA wouldn't you? I fear its like Corbyn that Sanders for example knows he can't win but just want to dictate the direction of the democrats.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bwfcfan5 said:

And a serious question - if these candidates are so intelligent (and some clearly are) you'd think they'd know how to become electable in the USA wouldn't you? I fear its like Corbyn that Sanders for example knows he can't win but just want to dictate the direction of the democrats.

 

There's a big difference between being intelligent and appealing to a base that Trump has spent his presidency cultivating. In fact it's the polar opposite. The brighter you appear - the more a Trump supporter is going to view you with suspicion. They go for the 'strong man' thing. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kent_white said:

There's a big difference between being intelligent and appealing to a base that Trump has spent his presidency cultivating. In fact it's the polar opposite. The brighter you appear - the more a Trump supporter is going to view you with suspicion. They go for the 'strong man' thing. 

 

There is - but then why not play to the crowd? I'm not saying out Trump, Trump - but you know show some electoral know-how.

Corbyn wasn't that bright - and that's why he didn't. But I think likes of Sandars are but they're positioning themselves for a crushing at the ballot box. And we know it - so surely they must too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, bwfcfan5 said:

There is - but then why not play to the crowd? I'm not saying out Trump, Trump - but you know show some electoral know-how.

Corbyn wasn't that bright - and that's why he didn't. But I think likes of Sandars are but they're positioning themselves for a crushing at the ballot box. And we know it - so surely they must too?

Sanders can articulate himself a lot better than JC ever could. And he's much more charismatic - so he's a better chance of making an impression. Although I think Trump is pretty much unplayable. 

How do you win against someone who's main counter argument is telling everybody how great he is and giving you a stupid nickname? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, kent_white said:

Sanders can articulate himself a lot better than JC ever could. And he's much more charismatic - so he's a better chance of making an impression. Although I think Trump is pretty much unplayable. 

How do you win against someone who's main counter argument is telling everybody how great he is and giving you a stupid nickname? 

 

How do you win? You expose it. And put a credible alternative forward. The people who voted him in (the crucial votes) aren't Trump loyalists - or mad enough to think he's the answer but they need a better answer to their problems. If that answer only resides in intellectuals speaking to each other and engaging only with the highly engaged and youth vote - well see what happens. Corbyn's Labour did not speak once to middle England to those struggling in work to make ends meet - it spoke to the 5% poorest in society (who rarely vote) and inner city middle class people who would like to help the homeless man they walk past on their way to the office everyday without needing to get their hands dirty. But what did he say to a family on say £40K a year with 3 kids just about surviving? The people who vote...he said nothing - his messaging missed them entirely. And Sandars is the same. You have to engage the electorate that matter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, kent_white said:

Still intellectually wipes the floor with your spiritual hero everytime :) To be fair any of the remaining democratic candidates do :)

I think you misunderstood mate, it was an actual word I was word referring to which caused NiC to become the WW Kapo last Friday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bwfcfan5 said:

How do you win? You expose it. And put a credible alternative forward. The people who voted him in (the crucial votes) aren't Trump loyalists - or mad enough to think he's the answer but they need a better answer to their problems. If that answer only resides in intellectuals speaking to each other and engaging only with the highly engaged and youth vote - well see what happens. Corbyn's Labour did not speak once to middle England to those struggling in work to make ends meet - it spoke to the 5% poorest in society (who rarely vote) and inner city middle class people who would like to help the homeless man they walk past on their way to the office everyday without needing to get their hands dirty. But what did he say to a family on say £40K a year with 3 kids just about surviving? The people who vote...he said nothing - his messaging missed them entirely. And Sandars is the same. You have to engage the electorate that matter. 

People have been exposing him for 6 years. And folk lap it up. 

One of my main issues with Corbyn was that he never really articulated to people what the future could look like in the UK with a socialist agenda. And the benefits that might bring for everybody. 

I reckon BS could have a better stab at it. Still doubt it will work - most people won't listen for long enough to set the ideas out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kent_white said:

People have been exposing him for 6 years. And folk lap it up. 

One of my main issues with Corbyn was that he never really articulated to people what the future could look like in the UK with a socialist agenda. And the benefits that might bring for everybody. 

I reckon BS could have a better stab at it. Still doubt it will work - most people won't listen for long enough to set the ideas out.

I don't mean some sort of "gotcha expose". Someone quick witted enough to engage, bamboozle and mimic Trump. Corbyn's kinder politics didn't work did they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter
4 minutes ago, kent_white said:

People have been exposing him for 6 years. And folk lap it up. 

One of my main issues with Corbyn was that he never really articulated to people what the future could look like in the UK with a socialist agenda. And the benefits that might bring for everybody. 

I reckon BS could have a better stab at it. Still doubt it will work - most people won't listen for long enough to set the ideas out.

Heard a bit of a discussion on the merits of the democrat candidates.

Think it was Sanders they were referring to - calls himself socialist, but isn't really (so they said).

For me, labelling some of these people one way or another pigeonholes them too much.

Some are clearly driven by an ideology, like Corbyn, but many will have beliefs that are a mixed bag. Up to us to decide which is best.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Heard a bit of a discussion on the merits of the democrat candidates.

Think it was Sanders they were referring to - calls himself socialist, but isn't really (so they said).

For me, labelling some of these people one way or another pigeonholes them too much.

Some are clearly driven by an ideology, like Corbyn, but many will have beliefs that are a mixed bag. Up to us to decide which is best.

 

I'd say comparatively and relative to the positions in each country, Sandars is way more socialist than Corbyn - at least in his policy platform.

https://www.politico.com/2020-election/candidates-views-on-the-issues/bernie-sanders/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter
42 minutes ago, bwfcfan5 said:

I'd say comparatively and relative to the positions in each country, Sandars is way more socialist than Corbyn - at least in his policy platform.

https://www.politico.com/2020-election/candidates-views-on-the-issues/bernie-sanders/

Yes well I was going off the comments from supposed experts. Seemed to suggest he's not as left as he likes to portray.

Obviously, he's Stalin mark 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
13 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Yes well I was going off the comments from supposed experts. Seemed to suggest he's not as left as he likes to portray.

Obviously, he's Stalin mark 2.

I'm still wondering who this new runner 'Sandars' is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.