Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Politics


miamiwhite

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mickbrown said:

Yet ignored Boris's?

Ah it's good to be back🙂

How very strange; I’ve never ignored Boris’s history. Weird.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mickbrown said:

Just wondering what you might find in Starmer's background that you might find disagreeable if you're happy with Boris's?

 

I only know what I’ve noticed en passant about Boris. Most of it is generally known.

I don’t think I’ve ever commented on Boris’s past, but I know of your form in assuming such things. 😉

I think Sir Keir’s time as Director of Public Prosecutions might be interesting. I haven’t spent any time looking at it, but might if Labour ever threaten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, boltondiver said:

I only know what I’ve noticed en passant about Boris. Most of it is generally known.

I don’t think I’ve ever commented on Boris’s past, but I know of your form in assuming such things. 😉

I think Sir Keir’s time as Director of Public Prosecutions might be interesting. I haven’t spent any time looking at it, but might if Labour ever threaten.

The PMs background doesn't seem to cause you any concerns though.

Also interesting that a bloke's time as DPP could be viewed as a negative whereas the serial adulterer's career of bullshitting for a living seems to be just what we need in a PM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mickbrown said:

The PMs background doesn't seem to cause you any concerns though.

Also interesting that a bloke's time as DPP could be viewed as a negative whereas the serial adulterer's career of bullshitting for a living seems to be just what we need in a PM.

Is it the fact he’s a top shagger or the fact he tells porkies like all politicians that upsets you so much mick out of interest? Clearly whoever replaces him will fall into the latter category so I’m assuming it’s his past bawsdeep of a weekend with someone else’s wife encounters that troubles you? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Escobarp said:

Is it the fact he’s a top shagger or the fact he tells porkies like all politicians that upsets you so much mick out of interest? Clearly whoever replaces him will fall into the latter category so I’m assuming it’s his past bawsdeep of a weekend with someone else’s wife encounters that troubles you? 

I know they all fib. He's an industrial strength bullshitter. 

The way he treats people says a lot about the bloke. He's just a bit of a cunt.

Edited by mickbrown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mickbrown said:

I know they all fib. He's industrial strength bullshitter. 

The way he treats people says a lot about the bloke. He's just a bit of a cunt.

To be fair, I thought Starmer was a reasonably decent bloke. You never can tell.

Anyway, back to Boris. What evidence do you have to back up your claims?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mickbrown said:

You misspelled 'bored'

 

Well then, stay tuned, plenty to come 😃,  or is this ️ being taken home again ?

I apologise if you can't hack it not being in your personal Boris hating echo chamber, maybe you should start a new thread, as this one covers ALL POLITICAL DISCUSSIONS. 

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/keir-starmer-labour-leadership-cps-ian-tomlinson-john-worboys-a9276321.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Boby Brno said:

Both. 
Ive seen stuff in the tabloids but you can’t really believe them. Just wondering what inside info you have. 

He's been sacked for lying. Twice.

It's common knowledge he got that art advisor woman up the duff. 

Inside knowledge? Wouldn't call it that but I have been told of some of the shit he's got up to from a journalist I know. He's a wrong un,  make no mistake

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, mickbrown said:

The PMs background doesn't seem to cause you any concerns though.

Also interesting that a bloke's time as DPP could be viewed as a negative whereas the serial adulterer's career of bullshitting for a living seems to be just what we need in a PM.

Would it make any difference to you, either way?

Thought not, so pretty pointless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.