Farrelli Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 I think we are going under tomorrow. Can't see anymore adjournments being allowed and our debt cannot be unravelled without serious investment. Absolute shocker. Saturdays are going to be weird with no wanderers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted May 7, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted May 7, 2019 This so called agreement between ken and Bassini- surely it would be conditional upon the latter passing his fpp. And having failed that the contract not binding? Really don't understand how he (Bassini) can make such claims. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantra Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 (edited) I can't decide whether the court looks at us objectively as just another business which it should liquidate for being insolvent and generally shite, or whether they're as trigger-shy as Ken and Moonshift and don't want to liquidate a club like Bolton, so are willing to just prolong and prolong to give enough time for a better solution. Guess tomorrow will tell me the answer. Edited May 7, 2019 by Mantra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birch-chorley Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 25 minutes ago, DomRepWanderer said: Marc Iles @MarcIles 37m37 minutes ago More Absolutely no indication of administration, or otherwise from #BWFC. There is a small window tomorrow morning but to be gambling like this with 145 years of football history is shameful. Didn’t realise he was part of the fabled Shania Twain bid God knows how that bid failed where Deanos bid was accepted Must have been because they had less money to invest than Deano did with his £4m pay day loan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Banks Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 BOLTON. No admin today. Due to tell court there will be tomorrow. Hope judge in good mood. Football Ventures fav to take in admin. On their own now. Very very odd. Couldn’t afford it as a buy in December. But can in admin. So why seek partners and then drop them ... 6:26 PM · May 7, 2019 · Twitter Web App Nixons latest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leadfrog1 Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 I'm actually getting bored with this stuff now, it's worse than being edged. Everytime we think there's a resolution it's quickly snuffed out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Take Hunt Off Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 Lets hope the scottish cnut is right for once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Spider Posted May 7, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted May 7, 2019 Marc Iles says he's "furious" As would I be if Nixon kept beating me to all the info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomRepWanderer Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 The loon speaks again. http://b-ac.es/72a99 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howardroark Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 FV is unlikely and the link up with MJ is detrimental as it doesn’t allow for the sale of a valuable asset to fund growth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 6 minutes ago, Howardroark said: FV is unlikely and the link up with MJ is detrimental as it doesn’t allow for the sale of a valuable asset to fund growth. Couldn’t MJ take equity in return for the car park loan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Banks Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 12 minutes ago, Howardroark said: FV is unlikely and the link up with MJ is detrimental as it doesn’t allow for the sale of a valuable asset to fund growth. Interestingly Nixon believes FV favourites, and MJ is part of the set up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jules_darby Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 17 minutes ago, Howardroark said: FV is unlikely and the link up with MJ is detrimental as it doesn’t allow for the sale of a valuable asset to fund growth. So, why are you back love? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howardroark Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 11 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said: Couldn’t MJ take equity in return for the car park loan. Not an easy conversion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jcookie Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 19 minutes ago, Howardroark said: FV is unlikely and the link up with MJ is detrimental as it doesn’t allow for the sale of a valuable asset to fund growth. So who is the likely buyer from admin @Howardroark .. someone your working for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howardroark Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 7 minutes ago, Jcookie said: So who is the likely buyer from admin @Howardroark .. someone your working for? No nothing on my side, admin will bring a number of bidders, FV wouldn’t win an auction. Nixon doesn’t understand administration process for a football club, there can’t be a ‘favourite’ it’s highest bidder wins (above threshold). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Faustus Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 Howard, do you favour a brogue or a winklepicker for that office/all bar one chic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedBloodzCell Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 1 minute ago, Howardroark said: No nothing on my side, admin will bring a number of bidders, FV wouldn’t win an auction. Nixon doesn’t understand administration process for a football club, there can’t be a ‘favourite’ it’s highest bidder wins (above threshold). Do you think admin will happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SalfordOriginal Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 5 minutes ago, Howardroark said: No nothing on my side, admin will bring a number of bidders, FV wouldn’t win an auction. Nixon doesn’t understand administration process for a football club, there can’t be a ‘favourite’ it’s highest bidder wins (above threshold). Howard - What is your favorite way to kill an elephant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Faustus Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 Howard- do you pronounce scone like cone, or like gone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Banks Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 Howard, who determines the threshold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantra Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 Every point seems to have a counter point and it’s frustrating while trying to keep up with this. We need admin or a solvent sale. admin can’t happen without Ken or Moonshift saying “let’s do it” Ken nor Moonshift want to press the admin button. no time for a solvent sale to happen unless Bassini has made a load more money. Bassini is a loon and no way is getting the cash. Ken can’t put us into admin until Bassini pisses off, due to some sketchy agreement that could or could not be bollocks. Bassini won’t piss off because he wants to “do the right thing.” moonshift have no incentive to put us into admin other than the several fans guilt-tripping K Gordon and wanting to do right by Eddies legacy, at a cost which might see them get their money back. If things change and Bassini does piss off Ken can put us into admin but why do that? By letting Moonshift do it, he’s off the hook for 5 million. If Moonshift do feel it’s the right thing to do then they need a quick deal. Quick deal can’t happen because no one has the cash up front to take us out. And to make matters worse the front runners FVW have apparently decreased their team. Long admin is unlikely, could result in business being wound down. But if someone can fund it then highest bidder wins. liquidation in court tomorrow is possible but then again we could just ask for more time and the judge might not want to liquidate us as it fucks over the creditors. if we don’t want to gamble on an adjournment we can buy 10 days with a “intent to appoint admin.” So essentially anything is possible but everything is impossible. did I miss anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Spider Posted May 7, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted May 7, 2019 It’ll be a ten day extension. bet my mortgage on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howardroark Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 19 minutes ago, Dr Faustus said: Howard, do you favour a brogue or a winklepicker for that office/all bar one chic? Cuban heel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sleepingindian Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 4 minutes ago, Spider said: It’ll be a ten day extension. bet my mortgage on it. does that mean whoever wins the bet pays your mortgage. very cleva Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts