Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Take Over


Kane57

Recommended Posts

She def wasn’t as previously she stated her presence on here was to drop info and cause a knee jerk reaction from KA as her party were aware he reads this site 

whoever the fuck she is and whoever the fuck she’s / her company have been whoring themselves too throughout this process, it’s fucking boring

more comebacks than Liz MacDonald 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

I'm confident Howard's posts were made in good faith

His intention was to see bwfc in a better place

He's got a bit strange on occasion recently, but he's more good than bad

And the Bahrain Prince was genius, you have to admit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Casino said:

I'm confident Howard's posts were made in good faith

His intention was to see bwfc in a better place

He's got a bit strange on occasion recently, but he's more good than bad

And the Bahrain Prince was genius, you have to admit

Caught a bag full of fish with that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
1 minute ago, barrycowdrill said:

So are ours

what is definite through all this is, Howard had as much sway and influence in that than me, you or anyone else on here had 

5 fifths of fuck all 

Tempted to agree

Always seemed an odd place to start a campaign

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
1 minute ago, Alf Hartigan said:

Casino, is Howard's claim that the Basran bid walked away due to Sharia Law utter bollocks then?

Ask her

Sounds it to me, but then let's not forget that Basra group was football ventures, a key playe rbeing Michael James who is still around

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Alf Hartigan said:

Right, so Howard is representing Michael James then?

Christ knows , it's got more riddles than an episode of 3-2-1 , unless Howard is the reincarnation of Ted Rogers.

Edited by dusan nikolic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Alf Hartigan said:

Right, so Howard is representing Michael James then?

But isn’t Michael James part of FV and a large part of Howards time was spent being negative about FV not having the cash 🤷🏻‍♂️

More sounds like EDT .. wanting to point out certain things Ken’s been hiding away and also investigating potential bidders to see if they had the cash to pay the trust back because all long that’s all they want  from Bolton, which  was just wanting their money back! But why would they need to discredit the ST?

Edited by Jcookie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jcookie said:

But isn’t Michael James part of FV and a large part of Howards time was spent being negative about FV not having the cash 🤷🏻‍♂️

More sounds like EDT .. wanting to point out certain things Ken’s been hiding away and also investigating potential bidders to see if they had the cash to pay the trust back because all long that’s all they want  from Bolton, which  was just wanting their money back! But why would they need to discredit the ST?

I agree, plus all whole narrative previously from Howard was about the trust taking back shares. Etc. 

Information that would seemingly be available to someone employed by the trust. 

The people now involved with such may be out of touch with the ‘general fan’ feel and opinion. Hence sending someone on here. 

Edited by JJ10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
4 minutes ago, Benny The Ball said:

i think this is true 

Which, when I say this place seemed an odd place to choose, perhaps explains why Howard does her job and I do mine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Jcookie said:

But isn’t Michael James part of FV and a large part of Howards time was spent being negative about FV not having the cash 🤷🏻‍♂️

More sounds like EDT .. wanting to point out certain things Ken’s been hiding away and also investigating potential bidders to see if they had the cash to pay the trust back because all long that’s all they want  from Bolton, which  was just wanting their money back! But why would they need to discredit the ST?

H said ask the trust why they refused to waive their ‘exclusivity period’. Well maybe now they are going to and don't need pushing in that direction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Razaldo9 said:

H said ask the trust why they refused to waive their ‘exclusivity period’. Well maybe now they are going to and don't need pushing in that direction. 

Yes maybe! But I thought by EFL regulation .. An administrator has to advertise offers for the club for a minimum of 21 days to stop pre pack deals but in that period they have to speak to the ST and give them a chance to submit a bid in that period? So the trust never have an exclusivity period just that they are given a chance to speak to the administrator in that 21 day period?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, barrycowdrill said:

Came on here to drop info so KA would react. Didn’t work 

then was fronting money for a man who was providing security against property. He rented a house 

slid in to Trafs DM’s and called him a cunt 

then likened Traf to a wife beater on an open forum 

if that’s what a PR company gives you these days I’ll stick to putting fucking adverts up on traffic lights if I ever want some business 

absolute lunatic 

To be fair to H. Traf has just got back from one of his many holidays. 

He probably thought he was bassini. Easy mistake to make! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.