DomRepWanderer Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 1 minute ago, Matty said: Or the EDT could be either.... No Iles has spoken to some inside and it's definitely the sweaty fucker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sluffy Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 1 minute ago, DomRepWanderer said: No Iles has spoken to some inside and it's definitely the sweaty fucker. And the 'some inside' would that be the likes of McGinlay and Dearden who he's probably sat next to in the press box perhaps? Iles has already reported that the problem was a legal rep from the Anderson camp not being available to sign. Hardly Anderson's fault if that's the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lt. Aldo Raine Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, Sluffy said: And the 'some inside' would that be the likes of McGinlay and Dearden who he's probably sat next to in the press box perhaps? No. I know it's the done thing to criticise Iles on here but his sources won't be McGinlay and Dearden. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted August 24, 2019 Moderators Share Posted August 24, 2019 Tbf I think iles has since said might be more to it But, I guess equally, there might not If brittan was really attending today, would waiting for a signature stop her Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny G Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 Defo Anderson. The official line of legal reps being unavailable to sign is bollocks. Hear it’s more of a delaying tactic than a deal breaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sluffy Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 1 minute ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said: No. I know it's the done thing to criticise Iles on here but his sources won't be McGinlay and Dearden. I never actually said they were did I? My post was highlighting what credence his so called research brought to his reply in the twenty minutes he had to canvass and ascertain such facts whilst being sat in the press box? The answer you might wish to receive often depends on the persons you ask - hence my reference to McGinlay and Dearden. I thought you would have understood the point I was making. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campos_Wig Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 15 minutes ago, Sluffy said: Iles has already reported that the problem was a legal rep from the Anderson camp not being available to sign. Hardly Anderson's fault if that's the case. I smell BS, in a world of digital signatures etc this is a lame excuse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lt. Aldo Raine Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 1 minute ago, Sluffy said: I never actually said they were did I? My post was highlighting what credence his so called research brought to his reply in the twenty minutes he had to canvass and ascertain such facts whilst being sat in the press box? The answer you might wish to receive often depends on the persons you ask - hence my reference to McGinlay and Dearden. I thought you would have understood the point I was making. You replied to a post stating that Iles confirmed the hold up was due to Anderson after speaking to someone inside. You then suggested that he might've been provided that information by McGinlay and Dearden whilst sat next to them in the press box. I'm suggesting that he won't have been, and that you don't believe he would've been either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulhanley Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, Campos_Wig said: I smell BS, in a world of digital signatures etc this is a lame excuse In the legal world it often still has to be the actual signature. Nonetheless in the most general sense you are quite right to be smelling BS!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted August 24, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted August 24, 2019 Went to the wrong address to be signed perhaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted August 24, 2019 Moderators Share Posted August 24, 2019 43 minutes ago, Danny G said: Defo Anderson. The official line of legal reps being unavailable to sign is bollocks. Hear it’s more of a delaying tactic than a deal breaker. Your info from yesterday was clearly accurate so no reason to doubt you now What's in it for him to delay it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderlust Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 I'm sure that if Anderson wanted a legal representative to turn up and sign he would make it happen. Similarly if he wanted to play silly buggers he could easily instruct his representative not to be available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sluffy Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 5 minutes ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said: You replied to a post stating that Iles confirmed the hold up was due to Anderson after speaking to someone inside. You then suggested that he might've been provided that information by McGinlay and Dearden whilst sat next to them in the press box. I'm suggesting that he won't have been, and that you don't believe he would've been either. Not sure why you are arguing unless you are somehow embarrassed about your original reply to me? I never said or even suggested that Iles asked McGinlay or Dearden about the position - it was you who wrongly jumped to that conclusion - my point was clearly the credence of how accurate Iles information was, was totally dependant on who he canvassed in those twenty minutes between his posts on the blog - and seeing he posted something else on the blog between times, suggests he didn't roam too far to get them. Maybe he asked a person/s who did know what was happening, maybe he didn't we simply don't know, and that's why I haven't taken such hearsay that it was all Anderson's fault as gospel, unlike some. Seeing that you've just now accepted that I had never believed Iles would have asked Jack and John, it makes your original reply to me somewhat misjudged and pointless. Time to move on I suggest as I do know that endless ad nauseam arguments won't be tolerated on this forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted August 24, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted August 24, 2019 4 minutes ago, Casino said: Your info from yesterday was clearly accurate so no reason to doubt you now What's in it for him to delay it? What I was wondering. Sooner it's done, sooner he gets his money? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcx666 Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 5 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: What I was wondering. Sooner it's done, sooner he gets his money? Probably delaying it so Bassini can appear with more legal claims Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny G Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 54 minutes ago, Casino said: Your info from yesterday was clearly accurate so no reason to doubt you now What's in it for him to delay it? Not a clue mate, neither does my source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matty Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 Are FV here today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 57 minutes ago, Casino said: Your info from yesterday was clearly accurate so no reason to doubt you now What's in it for him to delay it? Spiteful cunt wants to cause maximum damage to the club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lt. Aldo Raine Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 48 minutes ago, Sluffy said: Not sure why you are arguing unless you are somehow embarrassed about your original reply to me? I never said or even suggested that Iles asked McGinlay or Dearden about the position - it was you who wrongly jumped to that conclusion - my point was clearly the credence of how accurate Iles information was, was totally dependant on who he canvassed in those twenty minutes between his posts on the blog - and seeing he posted something else on the blog between times, suggests he didn't roam too far to get them. Maybe he asked a person/s who did know what was happening, maybe he didn't we simply don't know, and that's why I haven't taken such hearsay that it was all Anderson's fault as gospel, unlike some. Seeing that you've just now accepted that I had never believed Iles would have asked Jack and John, it makes your original reply to me somewhat misjudged and pointless. Time to move on I suggest as I do know that endless ad nauseam arguments won't be tolerated on this forum. There was a clear suggestion, intended as a unnecessary cheap dig, and now you're being disingenuous about it. There's a match on, though, so I'll focus on that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jules_darby Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 18 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said: Spiteful cunt wants to cause maximum damage to the club. Nah be about maximum return for him. Nothing more, nothing less. Not that I’m happy about it like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 (edited) 11 minutes ago, jules_darby said: Nah be about maximum return for him. Nothing more, nothing less. Not that I’m happy about it like Is it possible liquidation might realise just as much money as a takeover and also kill BWFC, if he can get as much money in liquidation I genuinely think the spiteful cunt would prefer that. Edited August 24, 2019 by Mounts Kipper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomski Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 What a prick Anderson really is. He never lets down when you think you can’t hate him anymore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sluffy Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 (edited) 39 minutes ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said: There was a clear suggestion, intended as a unnecessary cheap dig, and now you're being disingenuous about it. There's a match on, though, so I'll focus on that. Wrong. There never was a clear suggestion - you just read into it something that simply wasn't there. Now you're just arguing for arguments sake. I wasn't having a pop at Iles - I do so plenty times but not this time. You completely misunderstood the meaning of my post and thought you could have a cheap go at me. You're embarrassed you got caught out and feel the need to save face by arguing until the cows come home like you always do. I'm not playing your game today. Have a nice day Edited August 24, 2019 by Sluffy Grammar errors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enzo gambaro Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 RU-MOUR, RU-MOUR, RU-MOUR... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwfcfan5 Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 2 hours ago, Danny G said: Defo Anderson. The official line of legal reps being unavailable to sign is bollocks. Hear it’s more of a delaying tactic than a deal breaker. That is the issue. It’s a question of whether accidental or deliberate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts