Breightmet Boy Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 How many on here have had to delete the comments they’ve made about that shithouse? I’m on quite a few Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter RONNIE PHILLIPS Posted April 10, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted April 10, 2019 Now we are on a new thread & it appears Howard has been rumbled I'd like to hear what it was that led to Casino vouching for him.... Seems he was hoodwinked by a charlatan on the face of things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 (edited) This all of a sudden gives me a golden glow. I feel so much better that they still hate us. COYFWM. Edited April 10, 2019 by Mounts Kipper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter RONNIE PHILLIPS Posted April 10, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted April 10, 2019 1 minute ago, Mounts Kipper said: This all of a sudden gives me a golden glow. I feel so much better. COYFWM. Nice to know we still get under their skin even in our darkest hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boby Brno Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 13 minutes ago, Biganddaft said: I am not saying the greasy tw*t has done anything illegal I’m not saying you did but I’m guessing that Howard’s insinuation of some illegality struck a nerve more than people calling him a cunt. Perhaps it’s just an accepted fact that he is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter RONNIE PHILLIPS Posted April 10, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted April 10, 2019 If we fold my only interest in football will be cheering on anyone who rubs their dirty red noses in the shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birch-chorley Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 (edited) 25 minutes ago, RONNIE PHILLIPS said: Now we are on a new thread & it appears Howard has been rumbled I'd like to hear what it was that led to Casino vouching for him.... Seems he was hoodwinked by a charlatan on the face of things. Been rumbled? he clearly knew more than most about what’s going on The other mysterious poster Jon Gault also clearly had a better understanding Anyone still thinking Howard was just a WUM needs their head testing, he obviously had an agenda, he admitted as much, but he wasn’t an Ipswich fan taking the piss I’d imagine Casino had good reason to vouch for him / her Edited April 10, 2019 by birch-chorley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leyther_Matt Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 42 minutes ago, Burndens Bogs said: Protest at who exactly? The Andersons will be nowhere near the game. This club has been a financial car crash for the last 15 to 20 years, that's why we're deep in the shit. Yes it hurts. Nail on head. Goes back further than that when you think of the mess in the late 80s and then the debt we got in to when we moved to the Reebok. Tuesday night was gallows humour in the extreme. It hurts like fuck but I really don’t know what folk can be expected to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck Egg Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 28 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said: This all of a sudden gives me a golden glow. I feel so much better that they still hate us. COYFWM. Brilliant!! Wouldn't want sympathy from those glory hunting shitbags Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burndens Bogs Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 (edited) 34 minutes ago, birch-chorley said: Been rumbled he clearly knew more than most about what’s going on The other mysterious poster Jon Gault also clearly had a better understanding Anyone still thinking Howard was a WUM needs their heads testing, he obviously had an agenda, he admitted as much, but he wasn’t an Ipswich fan taking the piss He certainly knew the legalities of the situation, but i'm not having it that he was a PR man for a consortium financed by the Bahrainis. His "PR skills" were quite bizarre at times. Maybe he was some sort of legal secretary for one of the tyre kickers? Still doesn't explain his agenda though. It's funny how everything he said at first was reasonably positive, until it became clear that other parties were showing an interest and when Ken allegedly pulled the "Wrongadressgate" stroke, he seemed defeated. From that moment on Howard turned into Dr Death - the purveyor of doom. Edited April 10, 2019 by Burndens Bogs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Alf Hartigan Posted April 10, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted April 10, 2019 2 minutes ago, Burndens Bogs said: He certainly knew the legalities of the situation, but i'm not having it he was a PR man for a consortium financed by the Bahrainis. Maybe a legal secretary for one of the tyre kickers. Still doesn't explain his agenda though. It's funny how everything he said at first was reasonably positive, until it became clear that other parties were showing an interest and when Ken allegedly pulled the "Wrongadressgate" stroke he seemed defeated. Then Howard turned into Dr Death and the purveyor of doom I'd agree with that, definitely not a WUM though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck Egg Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 He/She was the only PR person I've ever heard of that a) Had financial knowledge beyond their remit, and b) reacted really badly to any perceived criticism or questioning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Zico Posted April 10, 2019 Moderators Share Posted April 10, 2019 1 hour ago, Biganddaft said: I am not talking about a bed sheet protest, I mean let's not let this club just die without screaming and shouting I know it won't make any difference but at least we can tell our kids we tried I'm going to them that anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burndens Bogs Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 Well we're still talking about her/him now and maybe that's what floated her/his boat. Perhaps she/him is flicking her bean right now/or firing one over his shoulder. We still appear to be fucked delux - but that still would have been the case even she/he had never posted on here.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boothy Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 The majority of what Howard came out with was nothing more than shit slinging. Even half of the ‘legalities’ haven’t been confirmed. Our resident experts, of which there are many, have claimed many a time to have learn from Howards revelations. I genuinely think the majority has just bamboozled people and played on what people want to hear and chose to hear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentBob Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 18 minutes ago, Duck Egg said: He/She was the only PR person I've ever heard of that a) Had financial knowledge beyond their remit, and b) reacted really badly to any perceived criticism or questioning Not only reacting badly, but also acting as if they're being personally attacked for specific questions. 90% of questions are fine but the few people asking questions that actually mattered were only doing so to attack his credibility and hoping to discredit him. I still stand by what I originally said. A lot of things they said make some sort of sense and they either know what they're talking about (somewhat at least) or they've done hell of a lot of research to put the whole story together. Either way, it was a job well done, but it was also easy to see it was nonsense when a PR person starts having a go at people for asking certain questions, while answering the easy ones. 15 minutes ago, Burndens Bogs said: Well we're still talking about her/him now and maybe that's what floated her/his boat. Perhaps she/him is flicking her bean right now/or firing one over his shoulder. True. I feel sorry for the people clinging onto his every word and defending him as if his fairy tale was ever going to come true. I will say that now the deadline that Howard set has passed, most seem to have wisened up, which in turn has made a lot more people realise the true nature of the situation. We're fucked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tombwfc Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 (edited) 50 minutes ago, birch-chorley said: Been rumbled? he clearly knew more than most about what’s going on The other mysterious poster Jon Gault also clearly had a better understanding Anyone still thinking Howard was just a WUM needs their head testing, he obviously had an agenda, he admitted as much, but he wasn’t an Ipswich fan taking the piss I’d imagine Casino had good reason to vouch for him / her It's hard to say how much he/she knew about what was going on, because nobody knows what's been going on. Howard said Basran had no money (already widely speculated on here) and that he wouldn't complete on a Sunday (he didn't). He also said the Ipswich game could end up being played at Portman Road the day before it came out that the we might not be allowed in at the UniBol. Those are literally the only three things that were ever backed up in any way by known events, and I might have even mis-remembered the last one. Edited April 10, 2019 by Tombwfc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted April 10, 2019 Moderators Share Posted April 10, 2019 1 hour ago, birch-chorley said: Been rumbled? he clearly knew more than most about what’s going on The other mysterious poster Jon Gault also clearly had a better understanding Anyone still thinking Howard was just a WUM needs their head testing, he obviously had an agenda, he admitted as much, but he wasn’t an Ipswich fan taking the piss I’d imagine Casino had good reason to vouch for him / her Thank you Just what Howard is up to will come out one day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentBob Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 4 minutes ago, Casino said: Thank you Just what Howard is up to will come out one day One day, assuming after the takeover is done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted April 10, 2019 Moderators Share Posted April 10, 2019 Whenever he decides to tell us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentBob Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 7 minutes ago, Casino said: Whenever he decides to tell us He already did, or at least his version. Wouldn't hold my breath on there being some deeper meaning to him being here spouting shite. Not questioning the proof he showed you or the other mods or what he knows either. Just seemed like he said what he wanted to in his last message Friday and then came back changing the story again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderlust Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 34 minutes ago, SilentBob said: He already did, or at least his version. Wouldn't hold my breath on there being some deeper meaning to him being here spouting shite. Not questioning the proof he showed you or the other mods or what he knows either. Just seemed like he said what he wanted to in his last message Friday and then came back changing the story again. .Maybe Howard changed his story because the story changed. As he said it had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royal white Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 Is there no chance of Howard taking over now? (I can’t even check sluffys recap as that was on the previous thread) If Howard was on a wind up then he/she needs to be applauded! That’s some top notch fishing he/she has done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentBob Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 2 hours ago, Hoppy510 said: .Maybe Howard changed his story because the story changed. As he said it had. I hope you're just trying (and failing) to play devils advocate, rather than actually believing the shite that's been said. Just in case you aren't and you actually believe Howard. Let's revisit the Bassini timeline (I did say this in the previous thread before it was nuked). 1) Bassini is leaked to Nixon - Howard immediately says he's been fed a red herring by KA/PA to scare other bidders. 2) Bassini ends up going public - Howard says even if he's interested he doesn't have any money. b) He then changes it to he has Thai backers who might want to launder a lot of money so they don't care. 3) He says Bassini is willing to pay the mystery buyer money to not reclaim shares (convenient excuse for any future delays with mystery buyer, I assume). 4) He then says he expects Bassini to complete the deal on Friday of last week. 5) Howard reemerges today and says he expected Bassini to complete the deal because the mystery buyers were willing to loan them the money to do so. So, just to clarify, you believe Howard changed the story because it's what actually happened? How do you go from saying it's false info fed by Ken Anderson to saying you're willing to loan him money to complete the deal? Bassini of all people, the guy Howard has constantly banged on about being bankrupt 625478 times. Anyways, sorry for anyone who is bored of reading this shit. I just can't get my head around how people are still blindly trusting someone on a forum for absolutely no reason, even though nothing said recently makes any sense at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anthonyj Posted April 11, 2019 Share Posted April 11, 2019 27 minutes ago, SilentBob said: I hope you're just trying (and failing) to play devils advocate, rather than actually believing the shite that's been said. Just in case you aren't and you actually believe Howard. Let's revisit the Bassini timeline (I did say this in the previous thread before it was nuked). 1) Bassini is leaked to Nixon - Howard immediately says he's been fed a red herring by KA/PA to scare other bidders. 2) Bassini ends up going public - Howard says even if he's interested he doesn't have any money. b) He then changes it to he has Thai backers who might want to launder a lot of money so they don't care. 3) He says Bassini is willing to pay the mystery buyer money to not reclaim shares (convenient excuse for any future delays with mystery buyer, I assume). 4) He then says he expects Bassini to complete the deal on Friday of last week. 5) Howard reemerges today and says he expected Bassini to complete the deal because the mystery buyers were willing to loan them the money to do so. So, just to clarify, you believe Howard changed the story because it's what actually happened? How do you go from saying it's false info fed by Ken Anderson to saying you're willing to loan him money to complete the deal? Bassini of all people, the guy Howard has constantly banged on about being bankrupt 625478 times. Anyways, sorry for anyone who is bored of reading this shit. I just can't get my head around how people are still blindly trusting someone on a forum for absolutely no reason, even though nothing said recently makes any sense at all. Sorry if i've misinterpreted this post, but did'nt Howard say his group were talking to 2 previously linked groups neither of which were Bassini? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts