Widnes Two Hats Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 It's the same questions being asked over and over again by the same people, the sooner is over and they all fuck off back to twitter, the better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howardroark Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 4 minutes ago, Gonk said: So is it an open court tomorrow? Can somebody make the judge aware that even a 48 hour, never mind 7day adjournment will pretty much guarantee that the club will either be sold by or taken from KA via the share recall, taking the liquidation option off the table They won’t accept it, the share recall remains optional and the identity is covered by the same NDA as last time, advice was sought on this earlier today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howardroark Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 4 minutes ago, Razaldo9 said: Is it even likely to be true that his demands have dropped? If it is, how much further do you believe they need to drop for him to take the offer your group made? It’s total nonsense, he has accepted a bid as per his notes today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jules_darby Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 8 minutes ago, Widnes Two Hats said: It's the same questions being asked over and over again by the same people, the sooner is over and they all fuck off back to twitter, the better I’m with the goat botherer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Spider Posted April 2, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted April 2, 2019 Just now, jules_darby said: I’m with the goat botherer Thirded ill find some busters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted April 2, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted April 2, 2019 1 minute ago, jules_darby said: I’m with the goat botherer It's something to do on a Saturday, if it all goes tits up I suppose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boby Brno Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 8 minutes ago, Howardroark said: It’s total nonsense, he has accepted a bid as per his notes today. https://www.realbusinessrescue.co.uk/amp/news/bolton-wanderers-football-club-heading-for-administration Remember, we’ve been here before. What he says and what he does are usually two separate things. The quotes in the article above were after he’d accepted the loan from ED to pay off the debt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonk Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 18 minutes ago, Howardroark said: They won’t accept it, the share recall remains optional and the identity is covered by the same NDA as last time, advice was sought on this earlier today. But if a 'bloke off the street' with a Bolton scarf stood up and said excuse me your honour, could I bring to the courts attention...and just spouted it out, although it could be treated as inadmissable at least the judge would be aware.., Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Biggish Dave Posted April 2, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted April 2, 2019 3 minutes ago, Biganddaft said: No, don't give a fuck what anyone on here thinks I've been a fan since 1967 season ticket holder since 1971 Bolton Wanderers were mentioned in my divorce, if going on Saturday leaves me open to ridicule go for it, I won't give a flying fuck You won’t be on your own Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howardroark Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 1 minute ago, Gonk said: But if a 'bloke off the street' with a Bolton scarf stood up and said excuse me your honour, could I bring to the courts attention...and just spouted it out, although it could be treated as inadmissable at least the judge would be aware.., Well yes, but it’s still not enough as it’s an option, not a certainty. Hilary has a much bigger job than last time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnstoneworth White Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 1 hour ago, Howardroark said: In chambers, recorded by the chamber What do you mean by 'recorded by the chamber?' That does not make any sense and would not stop reporting the outcome by the media. Did you reps attend the hearing? If so which court was it heard in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 7 minutes ago, Howardroark said: Well yes, but it’s still not enough as it’s an option, not a certainty. Hilary has a much bigger job than last time. She’s confident of gaining an adjournment, that I do know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantra Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said: She’s confident of gaining an adjournment, that I do know. What makes you say that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 1 minute ago, Mantra said: What makes you say that? I know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonk Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 11 minutes ago, Howardroark said: Well yes, but it’s still not enough as it’s an option, not a certainty. Hilary has a much bigger job than last time. If KA wants to rule out your men then surely Hilary would be standing up and saying that they don't want an adjournment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantra Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 Just now, Mounts Kipper said: I know. I'll have to take your word for it. Hope that's the case because even a one-day adjournment let's Howard's bidders back in, if I'm not mistaken. Hillary represents Bolton Wanderers rather than Ken? If so I doubt she will like being made to look a fool by Ken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Underpants Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 19 minutes ago, Biganddaft said: No, don't give a fuck what anyone on here thinks I've been a fan since 1967 season ticket holder since 1971 Bolton Wanderers were mentioned in my divorce, if going on Saturday leaves me open to ridicule go for it, I won't give a flying fuck Good man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted April 2, 2019 Moderators Share Posted April 2, 2019 11 minutes ago, Barnstoneworth White said: What do you mean by 'recorded by the chamber?' That does not make any sense and would not stop reporting the outcome by the media. Did you reps attend the hearing? If so which court was it heard in? That's what I was getting at Fair question, I thought Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted April 2, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted April 2, 2019 Just now, Gonk said: If KA wants to rule out your men then surely Hilary would be standing up and saying that they don't want an adjournment? Too much going on to be sure of anything, but is she representing ken and his company, or bwfc's interests. For the most part these would have been one and the same, but maybe not now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Zico Posted April 2, 2019 Moderators Share Posted April 2, 2019 40 minutes ago, Widnes Two Hats said: It's the same questions being asked over and over again by the same people, the sooner is over and they all fuck off back to twitter, the better @Widnes Two Hats aye, I didnt even know you could do @ like that till this latest influx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted April 2, 2019 Moderators Share Posted April 2, 2019 1 minute ago, Mantra said: I'll have to take your word for it. Hope that's the case because even a one-day adjournment let's Howard's bidders back in, if I'm not mistaken. Hillary represents Bolton Wanderers rather than Ken? If so I doubt she will like being made to look a fool by Ken. Ken is Bolton wanderers, surely? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Mantra said: I'll have to take your word for it. Hope that's the case because even a one-day adjournment let's Howard's bidders back in, if I'm not mistaken. Hillary represents Bolton Wanderers rather than Ken? If so I doubt she will like being made to look a fool by Ken. She’s working for Ken. Ken’s worried. Hilary has reassured him that he has strong case. I suppose that does not mean judge will see it that way. Edited April 2, 2019 by Mounts Kipper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howardroark Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 10 minutes ago, Barnstoneworth White said: What do you mean by 'recorded by the chamber?' That does not make any sense and would not stop reporting the outcome by the media. Did you reps attend the hearing? If so which court was it heard in? The hearing was held in chamber to stop it being recorded by the media or public. It is only reported by the chamber notary and even then it is with names redacted. You would need to know the court in which the chamber sat to gain access and that would be under an FOI request. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Zico Posted April 2, 2019 Moderators Share Posted April 2, 2019 Just now, Casino said: Ken is Bolton wanderers, surely? Jesus are you still banging that drum? 😉 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howardroark Posted April 2, 2019 Share Posted April 2, 2019 3 minutes ago, Gonk said: If KA wants to rule out your men then surely Hilary would be standing up and saying that they don't want an adjournment? Lesser of two evils, he gets paid either way, but one way is a lot more intrusive than the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts