Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Take Over


Kane57

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Casino said:

Seeing as there's a direct accusation, I will respond

I have not banned her

I'm pretty sure if she was banned she wouldn't be able to message

That was my thought too, if someone is banned on a website that usually means they are restricted from all areas.

Also you’ve stuck up for Howard on several occasions so it was a bit confusing to me.

It’s all getting a bit weird for me this. I assumed Howard was “banned” by his “employers.”

I think I’ll just wait for this to work itself out, it’s crunch time now, wheels are in motion. So unless my fear that the administrators will delay the process happens, we should get answers soon, with or without Howard’s input.

Edited by Mantra
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bit of light relief anyway from folk making shit up about the takeover which is good 

i don’t know casino other than on here but I’m pretty sure from what I’ve gleaned from on here if he had banned her then he would just say so. It’s hardly a crime. 

And as far as I’m aware casino knew who she was from the start so why would he need to use sign up email address to acquire info?

Sound likes She has lost the plot to me. Maybe the decorators are in and it’s a particularly heavy dose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
3 minutes ago, Escobarp said:

A bit of light relief anyway from folk making shit up about the takeover which is good 

i don’t know casino other than on here but I’m pretty sure from what I’ve gleaned from on here if he had banned her then he would just say so. It’s hardly a crime. 

And as far as I’m aware casino knew who she was from the start so why would he need to use sign up email address to acquire info?

Sound likes She has lost the plot to me. Maybe the decorators are in and it’s a particularly heavy dose. 

I haven't a clue who she is :)

I do know she claimed her intentions were for the good of the club, so that was enough for me

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Roadrunner Fan Ha-Ha, Ha-Ha (Sorry couldn't resist it). 

On a completely different subject, there are a lot of people on here who think only their opinions count, and when challanged act like petulant children. I'm not mentioning any names, but you know who you are!!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DavidLeesMullet said:

Re: Roadrunner Fan Ha-Ha, Ha-Ha (Sorry couldn't resist it). 

On a completely different subject, there are a lot of people on here who think only their opinions count, and when challanged act like petulant children. I'm not mentioning any names, but you know who you are!!! 

Would you say that when challenged on an internet football forum, claiming that someone is a wife beater and accusing the folk of Bolton being backwards would be a great example of that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jules_darby said:

Would you say that when challenged on an internet football forum, claiming that someone is a wife beater and accusing the folk of Bolton being backwards would be a great example of that?

I'm not on about that I'm on about general discussions about Bolton Wanderers. Some people just can't admit they're wrong or anybody else's opinion counts for anything. 

Edited by DavidLeesMullet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apart from the wifebeating garbage and strange assertion of lending Bassini money that never happened  due to lack of assets by B, H contributed both more intrigue and more clarity of due process than any other poster on this  thread. I don’t know who H is, but his/her contributions were far more interesting than the purile posts about chips/red sauce/fish or the repeated chavvy insults tossed around to people with opposing views. Whatever H’s agenda was, and there obviously was one, it shone a light on the shady dealings of takeovers and administration. If H is banned its piss poor as the forum is poorer without H’s contributions, even when  taken with a large pinch of salt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Biffo666 said:

Apart from the wifebeating garbage and strange assertion of lending Bassini money that never happened  due to lack of assets by B, H contributed both more intrigue and more clarity of due process than any other poster on this  thread. I don’t know who H is, but his/her contributions were far more interesting than the purile posts about chips/red sauce/fish or the repeated chavvy insults tossed around to people with opposing views. Whatever H’s agenda was, and there obviously was one, it shone a light on the shady dealings of takeovers and administration. If H is banned its piss poor as the forum is poorer without H’s contributions, even when  taken with a large pinch of salt. 

I like more than a pinch of salt on my chips thank you very much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TrickyTrotter said:

Roger Allanson 

“who was a board member of the BWFC Supporters Trust until recently”

 

https://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/17664931.allansons-solicitors-shut-down-and-manager-suspended-from-profession/?ref=mr&lp=2

 

Knew this was coming and so jumped before he was pushed. Right now Sluffy is just about getting hard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.