Jump to content
Wanderers Ways - passion not fashion
Kane57

Taken over?

Recommended Posts

Just now, Inspector Goole said:

Well maybe that fake account with now 3 followers was me all along trying to get a point across ?

Prove it then and I'll take it back. You were tweeting that account begging for information, so I don't believe you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been following this, like many others, with extreme interest - and add my thanks to Howard for his insight.  The bit I'm missing in my head is - if we assume Bassini doesn't prove funds/pass FPP tests (if appropriate), then if liquidation is a better option financially for KA than selling to Howard's bidders, what would possibly sway KA to go with H's mob other than an improved offer from Howard's bidders, or a rare moment of conscience/PR concerns on behalf of KA? 

Howard - is there any legal obligation for KA to accept a lone bid from your mob rather than force the club into liquidation? 

Apologies if this has already been spelled out, and others have grasped it - but I've read the whole thread and I can't see it! :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Colonel Mustard said:

I've been following this, like many others, with extreme interest - and add my thanks to Howard for his insight.  The bit I'm missing in my head is - if we assume Bassini doesn't prove funds/pass FPP tests (if appropriate), then if liquidation is a better option financially for KA than selling to Howard's bidders, what would possibly sway KA to go with H's mob other than an improved offer from Howard's bidders, or a rare moment of conscience/PR concerns on behalf of KA? 

Howard - is there any legal obligation for KA to accept a lone bid from your mob rather than force the club into liquidation? 

Apologies if this has already been spelled out, and others have grasped it - but I've read the whole thread and I can't see it! :(

Howard can answer in more depth I'm sure, but I think what it comes down to is that Ken has been doing some dodgy antics. If he sells to Bassini, a blind eye will be turned to said antics and he gets off with his money. If he liquidates Bolton, there will be serious investigations likely to happen into his tenure which could find out some of his dodgy dealings and put him in hot water.

That's my reading of it anway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Colonel Mustard said:

I've been following this, like many others, with extreme interest - and add my thanks to Howard for his insight.  The bit I'm missing in my head is - if we assume Bassini doesn't prove funds/pass FPP tests (if appropriate), then if liquidation is a better option financially for KA than selling to Howard's bidders, what would possibly sway KA to go with H's mob other than an improved offer from Howard's bidders, or a rare moment of conscience/PR concerns on behalf of KA? 

Howard - is there any legal obligation for KA to accept a lone bid from your mob rather than force the club into liquidation? 

Apologies if this has already been spelled out, and others have grasped it - but I've read the whole thread and I can't see it! :(

The only action would be retrospective, he cannot be forced to sell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has Howard's client's thrown in the towel now then? Not been able to keep up so much today. Someone do a summary!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Dr Faustus said:

How many years business experience do you have?

 

I am to cynical to believe anything until I see it nowadays, this is no different. Fuck knows what will happen... all any of us can really do is wait and see

6 years pal, I thought that was the norm these day

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Boothy said:

Has Howard's client's thrown in the towel now then? Not been able to keep up so much today. Someone do a summary!

Seems like Ken got the injunction, if there was ever one to get. Pushes Howard's buyers back a week. 

That's pretty much the only update apart from the BN article that just came out, but they sound clueless, so wouldn't buy into that. Chairman's notes too, usual shit. 

Edited by SilentBob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

The only action would be retrospective, he cannot be forced to sell.

What would it realistically take for your boys to be back on?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, WestStandUpper said:

What would it realistically take for your boys to be back on?

Kathy Lloyd getting her pussy well oiled. With their spunk. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, WestStandUpper said:

What would it realistically take for your boys to be back on?

are you looking to chip in?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Dr Faustus said:

are you looking to chip in?

Aye... couple of quid each might make a big difference.

I mean, in terms of Ken backing down, adjournment tomorrow etc..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nixon seems to be hinting that Gaspard are the ones Ken's calling out in this bit of the notes. 

"Unfortunately, there are several local individuals who are making themselves very busy talking to the media and anyone else who will listen, purporting to be buying the club.

I can categorically state that most of the names being mentioned on social media are people who might have expressed an interest, but have never been able to provide documentary evidence that they have the liquid cash funds.

Maybe, they are just waiting to say: “l offered to buy it”. I really don’t know, but l do wish they wouldn’t waste our time.

Indeed, one of the so called eligible buyers has been telling us he has the funds for over two years now without once showing acceptable proof of the funds."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gets more complicated by the day, this.

And no further to any conclusive answers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, WestStandUpper said:

Aye... couple of quid each might make a big difference.

I mean, in terms of Ken backing down, adjournment tomorrow etc..

Only an adjournment tomorrow of longer than one week

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Howardroark said:

Only an adjournment tomorrow of longer than one week

So Ken won't want one longer than that then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Howardroark said:

Only an adjournment tomorrow of longer than one week

Would an adjournment of one week only be too little?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More ups and downs these last few days than a trip on big one at Blackpool, feel sick now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

Only an adjournment tomorrow of longer than one week

How can the judge give anything other than what was promised last time that a buyer was going to pay off our debts and buy the club

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Dr Faustus said:

is that right? as I understood it, he admin fuck up put a seven day delay on matters in which time it would be too late

I think an adjournment of longer than a week and howards men could still get in if bassini fails. 

If the adjournemnt is a week or less, they are fucked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.