Jump to content
Wanderers Ways - passion not fashion

Recommended Posts

It's the same questions being asked over and over again by the same people, the sooner is over and they all fuck off back to twitter, the better

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Gonk said:

So is it an open court tomorrow? Can somebody make the judge  aware that even a 48 hour, never mind 7day adjournment will pretty much guarantee that the club will either be sold by or taken from KA via the share recall, taking the liquidation option off the table

They won’t accept it, the share recall remains optional and the identity is covered by the same NDA as last time, advice was sought on this earlier today. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Razaldo9 said:

Is it even likely to be true that his demands have dropped?

If it is, how much further do you believe they need to drop for him to take the offer your group made?

It’s total nonsense, he has accepted a bid as per his notes today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Widnes Two Hats said:

It's the same questions being asked over and over again by the same people, the sooner is over and they all fuck off back to twitter, the better

I’m with the goat botherer 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jules_darby said:

I’m with the goat botherer 

Thirded

ill find some busters

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

It’s total nonsense, he has accepted a bid as per his notes today.

https://www.realbusinessrescue.co.uk/amp/news/bolton-wanderers-football-club-heading-for-administration

Remember, we’ve been here before. What he says and what he does are usually two separate things.

The quotes in the article above were after he’d accepted the loan from ED to pay off the debt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

They won’t accept it, the share recall remains optional and the identity is covered by the same NDA as last time, advice was sought on this earlier today. 

But if a 'bloke off the street' with a Bolton scarf stood up and said excuse me your honour, could I bring to the courts attention...and just spouted it out, although it could be treated as inadmissable at least the judge would be aware..,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Biganddaft said:

No, don't give a fuck what anyone on here thinks I've been a fan since 1967 season ticket holder since 1971 Bolton Wanderers were mentioned in my divorce, if going on Saturday leaves me open to ridicule go for it, I won't give a flying fuck 

You won’t be on your own

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Gonk said:

But if a 'bloke off the street' with a Bolton scarf stood up and said excuse me your honour, could I bring to the courts attention...and just spouted it out, although it could be treated as inadmissable at least the judge would be aware..,

Well yes, but it’s still not enough as it’s an option, not a certainty. 

Hilary has a much bigger job than last time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Howardroark said:

In chambers, recorded by the chamber 

What do you mean by 'recorded by the chamber?' That does not make any sense and would not stop reporting the outcome by the media.

Did you reps attend the hearing?  If so which court was it heard in?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

Well yes, but it’s still not enough as it’s an option, not a certainty. 

Hilary has a much bigger job than last time.

She’s confident of gaining an adjournment, that I do know. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

She’s confident of gaining an adjournment, that I do know. 

What makes you say that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

Well yes, but it’s still not enough as it’s an option, not a certainty. 

Hilary has a much bigger job than last time.

If KA wants to rule out your men then surely Hilary would be standing up and saying that they don't want an adjournment? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Mounts Kipper said:

I know. 

I'll have to take your word for it.

Hope that's the case because even a one-day adjournment let's Howard's bidders back in, if I'm not mistaken.

Hillary represents Bolton Wanderers rather than Ken? If so I doubt she will like being made to look a fool by Ken.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Biganddaft said:

No, don't give a fuck what anyone on here thinks I've been a fan since 1967 season ticket holder since 1971 Bolton Wanderers were mentioned in my divorce, if going on Saturday leaves me open to ridicule go for it, I won't give a flying fuck 

Good man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Barnstoneworth White said:

What do you mean by 'recorded by the chamber?' That does not make any sense and would not stop reporting the outcome by the media.

Did you reps attend the hearing?  If so which court was it heard in?

That's what I was getting at

Fair question, I thought

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Gonk said:

If KA wants to rule out your men then surely Hilary would be standing up and saying that they don't want an adjournment? 

Too much going on to be sure of anything, but is she representing ken and his company, or bwfc's interests. For the most part these would have been one and the same, but maybe not now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Widnes Two Hats said:

It's the same questions being asked over and over again by the same people, the sooner is over and they all fuck off back to twitter, the better

@Widnes Two Hats aye, I didnt even know you could do @ like that till this latest influx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Mantra said:

I'll have to take your word for it.

Hope that's the case because even a one-day adjournment let's Howard's bidders back in, if I'm not mistaken.

Hillary represents Bolton Wanderers rather than Ken? If so I doubt she will like being made to look a fool by Ken.

Ken is Bolton wanderers, surely?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Mantra said:

I'll have to take your word for it.

Hope that's the case because even a one-day adjournment let's Howard's bidders back in, if I'm not mistaken.

Hillary represents Bolton Wanderers rather than Ken? If so I doubt she will like being made to look a fool by Ken.

She’s working for Ken. Ken’s worried. Hilary has reassured him that he has strong case. I suppose that does not mean judge will see it that way. 

Edited by Mounts Kipper

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Barnstoneworth White said:

What do you mean by 'recorded by the chamber?' That does not make any sense and would not stop reporting the outcome by the media.

Did you reps attend the hearing?  If so which court was it heard in?

The hearing was held in chamber to stop it being recorded by the media or public. It is only reported by the chamber notary and even then it is with names redacted. You would need to know the court in which the chamber sat to gain access and that would be under an FOI request.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Casino said:

Ken is Bolton wanderers, surely?

Jesus are you still banging that drum? 😉

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Gonk said:

If KA wants to rule out your men then surely Hilary would be standing up and saying that they don't want an adjournment? 

Lesser of two evils, he gets paid either way, but one way is a lot more intrusive than the other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.