Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Take Over


Kane57

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

Exactly, he was preparing to let it just go to liquidation uncontested to try and force a sale in the next 7 days. 

The bidders wanted 14 days as security against him double crossing.

In your opinion do you think ken deserves to make a few quid on flipping the club?

Edited by onlyoneawalker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

The idea was to box him in, to do that they needed 14 days due to notice period,  without adjournment there wouldn’t be 14 days and without the bidder there wouldn’t be an adjournment. 

The whole point was to avoid negotiating directly with KA, they don’t have to do that now.

 

 

Forgive me if I've got lost along the way, or if this has already been explained. But what is the mechanism for "the bidder" being able to progress this without having to negotiate with Ken ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, beanfund said:

Forgive me if I've got lost along the way, or if this has already been explained. But what is the mechanism for "the bidder" being able to progress this without having to negotiate with Ken ?

At the point of 14 days they can claim the shares held as security, this gives them ownership without paying his ‘fee’. 

If Ken wants his fee then he sells to them. 

Two weeks gives a deadline for all parties to make the necessary transactions etc. 

Ken would’ve let this run in to liquidation and held them to ransom/let it go under.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
8 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

At the point of 14 days they can claim the shares held as security, this gives them ownership without paying his ‘fee’. 

If Ken wants his fee then he sells to them. 

Two weeks gives a deadline for all parties to make the necessary transactions etc. 

Ken would’ve let this run in to liquidation and held them to ransom/let it go under.

Why did bwfc defend the order today

Sorry if I'm being thick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
2 hours ago, gonzo said:

Presume this has been posted but it’s pretty spot on.

 

thought that was curly watts at first from the still image 

Edited by ZicoKelly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter
29 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

At the point of 14 days they can claim the shares held as security, this gives them ownership without paying his ‘fee’. 

If Ken wants his fee then he sells to them. 

Two weeks gives a deadline for all parties to make the necessary transactions etc. 

Ken would’ve let this run in to liquidation and held them to ransom/let it go under.

Your last sentence says everything. Bloke's a massive cunt and the people talking to moonshift seemingly know this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Casino said:

Still not getting it

Tell us what happens now

S l o w l y

Ok 

Ken was not planning on defending the order today. 

That would’ve left 7 days to do a deal. 

Ken would’ve held all the power as anybody wanting to buy/save the club would have to pay him and then HMRC etc. He could’ve dictated his price effectively such was the desperation of the situation. 

By making themselves known last night and indicating they would pay Ken’s price, it gave him cause and valid reason to seek the adjournment, as without it the deal may not have been completed in time and he loses a pay day. It was also a condition of the buyer that the club not be under the WU order. 

What this now means is that Ken has a buyer at a price he is comfortable with. HOWEVER, if he messes them around they will simply refuse to deal with him and wait until the 3rd to take back his shares. 

They have the ability to take back the shares by novating (transferring) the ICI- Moonshift debt to themselves. 

Worth noting that Ken wouldn’t have known the debt had been novated until after the court hearing, or whenever Lee opens his post.

Edited by Howardroark
Addition
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

Ok 

Ken was not planning on defending the order today. 

That would’ve left 7 days to do a deal. 

Ken would’ve held all the power as anybody wanting to buy/save the club would have to pay him and then HMRC etc. He could’ve dictated his price effectively such was the desperation of the situation. 

By making themselves known last night and indicating they would pay Ken’s price it gave him cause and valid reasonto seek the adjournment, as without it the deal may not have been completed in time and he loses a pay day. It was also a condition of the buyer that the club not be under the WU order. 

What this now means is that Ken has a buyer at a price he is comfortable with. HOWEVER, if he messes them around they will simply refuse to deal with him and wait until the 3rd to take back his shares. 

They have the ability to take back the shares by novating (transferring) the ICI- Moonshift debt to themselves. 

Worth noting that Ken wouldn’t have known the debt had been novated until after the court hearing, or whenever Lee opens his post.

You'll be copying and pasting this every 10 minutes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.