Jump to content
Wanderers Ways - passion not fashion
Sign in to follow this  
kent_white

Fanzone

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Traf said:

This particular Richard head will be more than happy to knock you into the middle of next week, you patronising cunt.

Now why don't you and the other boring just fuck and chat elsewhere. Nobody on here gives a fuck about what either of you pompous pricks have to say. 

Woah!!!! Just hang on a minute here

This site is definitely going to the dogs 

Two pages ago Traf offered the first straightener on here for ages. And all you set of pansies can do is keep on arguing the toss about the specifics of who said what and the title of the thread

Get a fucking grip. Venue is obvious. Day and time need sorting 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MancWanderer said:

Woah!!!! Just hang on a minute here

This site is definitely going to the dogs 

Two pages ago Traf offered the first straightener on here for ages. And all you set of pansies can do is keep on arguing the toss about the specifics of who said what and the title of the thread

Get a fucking grip. Venue is obvious. Day and time need sorting 

CC will need to order the ring and ride 😊

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

 Custard and Sluffy are obviously Wanderers fans, but they don't quite fit the mantle on here with their holier than thou attitude, their condescending and often patronising posts, they just rub people up the wrong way.

Maybe they'd be better on the wanderer.co.uk or some other Wanderers site , but i'd guess those sites have long  since got of them bored of them and fucked them off.

This is a site for Wanderers fans, not wannabe forensic accountants.

Edited by Burndens Bogs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Burndens Bogs said:

 Maybe they'd be better on the wanderer.co.uk or some other Wanderers site ,

Maybe they could continue discussing Fibs & the Beeno over at Bolton Nuts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, MancWanderer said:

Woah!!!! Just hang on a minute here

This site is definitely going to the dogs 

Two pages ago Traf offered the first straightener on here for ages. And all you set of pansies can do is keep on arguing the toss about the specifics of who said what and the title of the thread

Get a fucking grip. Venue is obvious. Day and time need sorting 

Venue and time ain't obvious. Needs to be agreed with my mate Tyson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Traf said:

Maybe they could continue discussing Fibs & the Beeno over at Bolton Nuts?

The pair of them wouldn’t of lasted five minutes hanging around with proper lads, pair of fucking pansies. Sites going to the dogs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Leyther_Matt said:

Have you got any thoughts on the Fanzone?

I wish it well and hopes it meets in full the various expectations of those who would wish to frequent it.

I'm not sure why this thread turned into something of a shit-storm?

It started off about the ST's questionnaire about what they were gathering information on about running the Fanzone and I merely posed the question of whether or not, due to them breaching their own written constitution, they could legally do so?

Seemed a reasonable - and obvious - question to me.

I've not been negative, I wasn't being condescending, I wasn't trying to be clever, put the ST down or anything else - merely asking a simple question in advance of the event because if there is an issue then the ST and the club have time to work around it and still put on the Fanzone and if there wasn't then all well and good and my concern wasn't warranted.

Isn't that better than the Fanzone being called off at the last minute because they find they can no longer enter into contracts because they breached their rights to be able to do so, or even worse if your dad or child hurts themselves whilst there and it is later found out no one is financially insured to put things right again for them?

This isn't a group of friends and neighbours putting on a barbeque in your back garden type thing, this is a registered company (albeit it non a profit organisation) putting on a public, commercial, event.

Like it or not they have to do so in requirement of the law.

As for the threats of abuse to Chris, a bloke certainly in his seventies, if not his eighties, is utterly disgraceful whatever provocation he may have made and to find out the worst he's said is that he finds a few on here either thick or a bit of a dickhead is a shocking overreaction from some.  

Maybe some of the stuff was said towards him in jest but some jokes just aren't funny - and can lead to those who said it being referred to the police.

https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2019/jun/13/police-investigate-jo-brands-battery-acid-remark

I'm no spoilsport or anything but several grown men issuing threats of violence to a pensioner, just because he called them thick or a dickhead is a massive and disgraceful overreaction in my eyes.

Maybe he should have kept his thoughts to himself but macho threats of violence towards him for saying so is unbelievable and totally unwarranted.

Are we not better than this by now?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it utterly bizarre that there’s any suggestion that the hotel/BWFC would have over any sort of official responsibility to the trust. To me at least, it seems pretty clear that they’re only being used as a bit of a think tank, and even then probably overestimating their own importance in that particular role. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Chris Custodiet said:

Venue and time ain't obvious. Needs to be agreed with my mate Tyson

Venue is non-negotiable

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Sluffy said:

As for the threats of abuse to Chris, a bloke certainly in his seventies, if not his eighties, is utterly disgraceful whatever provocation he may have made and to find out the worst he's said is that he finds a few on here either thick or a bit of a dickhead is a shocking overreaction from some.  

Maybe some of the stuff was said towards him in jest but some jokes just aren't funny - and can lead to those who said it being referred to the police.

https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2019/jun/13/police-investigate-jo-brands-battery-acid-remark

I'm no spoilsport or anything but several grown men issuing threats of violence to a pensioner, just because he called them thick or a dickhead is a massive and disgraceful overreaction in my eyes.

Maybe he should have kept his thoughts to himself but macho threats of violence towards him for saying so is unbelievable and totally unwarranted.

Are we not better than this by now?

 

I treat Wanderersways as a bit like being in a pub where everyone's in a big chat.

if Chris was in a pub and constantly stated out loud that he thought all the other people in the pub were dickheads, he'd certainly end up getting a slap.

He might think he's better, more intelligent, more correct etc etc than the rest of us, but (a) he's wrong and (b) it's not something you say out loud.  

Edited by Traf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Leyther_Matt said:

I find it utterly bizarre that there’s any suggestion that the hotel/BWFC would have over any sort of official responsibility to the trust. To me at least, it seems pretty clear that they’re only being used as a bit of a think tank, and even then probably overestimating their own importance in that particular role. 

Maybe you are absolutely right, nobody knows seems to know but the ST did put a tweet out (which I copied and posted on page three of this thread) that STATES that the Fanzine is being OPERATED as a PARTNERSHIP between the ST and Football Ventures

I read that as them having something of an official / contractual arrangement (whether written or implied) - and hence my question as to whether the ST was able to still do that considering it's apparent breaches to its own constitution.

I guess we'll find out soon enough

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I'm just sick of these two boring old fuckers turning every thread into a deep forensic analysis of the club / the owners/  the Trust / the BN  etc etc.

Sluffy has a forum of his own, yet spends all his time here. Seriously, why don't him & Chris have their superior discussions over at Nuts? I'm sure there are just as many people on Nuts who'd be interested in what they've got to say as there are on here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Given that we are potless, a fact our our esteemed accountants should appreciate. Doesn't it make sense that FV should outsource market research to the ST on the sly? jsl

Edited by RoadRunnerFan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because they obviously don't get the attention they want on there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd have thought that getting involved in the fanzone ought to be bwfc sa rather than bwfc st

The fact the st are trying to muscle in on fanzone while the sa are having meetings attended by 3 men and their dogs says plenty about the usefulness of both of them

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyway, I've said my piece, so I'm going to logout now.

I come on here for light relief/entertainment but I find the joy being sucked out of the site more and more by these two. You just know that as soon as one of them posts on a thread that (a) the other will soon follow and it develops into a Chuckle Brothers to me to you affair and (b) it all turns to dull shit.

In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if Chris & Sluffy weren't the same person.

Goodnight Vienna xx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Traf said:

I treat Wanderersways as a bit like being in a pub where everyone's in a big chat.

if Chris was in a pub and constantly stated out loud that he thought all the other people in the pub were dickheads, he'd certainly end up getting a slap.

He might think he's better, more intelligent, more correct etc etc than the rest of us, but (a) he's wrong and (b) it's not something you say out loud.  

I agree you keep such thoughts to yourself.

I disagree that anyone should be assaulted if they didn't.

Would a woman get a slap if they said the same?

Would say a fifteen year old get one too if they got goby?

So why would anyone want to slap say an eighty year old bloke then?

I was brought up that "words will never hurt me" although sticks and stones might.

We are getting on for being almost a quarter of the way through the twenty-first century for Christ sake, I thought we'd left this Neanderthal behaviour way back in the nineteen seventies and eighties?

I get called worse than being a dickhead every single day on the forums and I just laugh it off.  

I don't care if people think I'm nuttier that a fruitcake, I don't give a toss what anyone says about me on a forum - why should I?  

I certainly don't go around calling people out because they call me a cunt or I'm mentally ill or something, so why would anyone want to react with violence (even in this mythical pub we are in) to being called something as tame and as wussy as "you're a bit thick and a bit of a Richard Head" (fuck me he never even said dickhead did he!).

For Christ sake sit down, turn a deaf ear to him and let's have a pint all round on me, eh?

And Custard please stop saying such things in future, it's upsetting the locals, come and have a drink with me too and let's try to make friends with all.

Does that seem reasonable with everyone?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look, anyone who knows me knows that I'd never actually resort to violence to solve a disagreement, because as soon as you do that, you've lost.

I was possibly a little too forceful in trying to get a point across to CC that he should more carefully how he describes other people who are "within earshot in the same room", as there are indeed folk out there quite willing to give someone else a slap for calling them dickheads for merely having an opinion.

My point, however, remains about both Sluffy & CC ruining pretty much every thread they post on with their long winded pompous sniping and I think this place would improve if they both took their discussions over to Sluffy's own site.

They don't welcome anyone else joining in anyway, so they'd be better suited over on Nuts, where you can count the active posters on one hand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sluffy fuck off. He never said any of the shit you have just written. 

You both ruin this site. I dread the posts now. I don’t want to have to read 400 lines of your drivel when trying so some light hearted lunch time entertainment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Big E said:

Sluffy fuck off. He never said any of the shit you have just written. 

You both ruin this site. I dread the posts now. I don’t want to have to read 400 lines of your drivel when trying so some light hearted lunch time entertainment.

I now await a thorough dismantling of everything said in the last 48 hours or so. And the perpetual grind of shit continues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Marc505 said:

I now await a thorough dismantling of everything said in the last 48 hours or so. And the perpetual grind of shit continues.

I woke up hoping the pair of them had been tazered overnight. It's been a few hours so here's hoping.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anything outside of the financial going’s on CC looks thick as pig shit anyway 

either way whatever he writes gets scrolled straight past. 

give someone the audience and they play up. Ignore the clowns and they quickly shut up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.