Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Rudy

Recommended Posts

  • Site Supporter
9 minutes ago, mickbrown said:

Is it still a swab up your nose?

Yes.

6 minutes ago, Casino said:

thats the one daughter had and results took 18 hours

Everyday is easily possible. Results iirc were in around 30-45 minutes.

Could do staff before they go onto residents pre shift.

Just got to get the machines made and sent out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
2 hours ago, Casino said:

Whats the point if no symptoms?

Can poss see the point of antibody testing

Are they going to test you every day

You tell me. We all think it's bullshit. Couldnt give a shit about us for the last few months. All of a sudden are wanting us to test. It's all about figures and targets. Oh and we got told we'd be getting a disciplinary if we refused. Nice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter
34 minutes ago, bolton_blondie said:

You tell me. We all think it's bullshit. Couldnt give a shit about us for the last few months. All of a sudden are wanting us to test. It's all about figures and targets. Oh and we got told we'd be getting a disciplinary if we refused. Nice. 

Monster - in  - law has been told that she needs to get a test in the next few days, she's NHS, 

She's got to get to Blackburn to get tested, and doesn't drive. No symptoms, same threat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nowack said:

It seems everyone is agreed that it's accurate testing, a working track and trace and a compliant population. 

Point one, I think that's the case isn't it? I don't remember hearing anything to the contrary.

Point two I think is only possible if point three happens which I doubt is  going to happen any time soon.

As regards testing like others on here I think that antibody testing will probably prove to be equally as important if not more so than the antigen test. Fingers crossed that the antibodies stick around for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we at the point where those in charge should get rid of any confusion and just simplify it and say:

- this is how the disease spreads

- this is how you minimise your risk 

- this is what you do if you think you have it

- this is what you do if you have it

and furlough is done, everyone is back at work, everything can open and we take it from there?

Edited by ErnestTurnip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ErnestTurnip said:

Are we at the point where those in charge should get rid of any confusion and just simplify it and say:

- this is how the disease spreads

- this is how you minimise your risk 

- this is what you do if you think you have it

- this is what you do if you have it

and furlough is done, everyone is back at work, everything can open and we take it from there?

I think that won't be to far off what will eventually happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter

What I really don’t understand is why they aren’t busting their balls to get an antibody test to everyone in the country.

Surely this will provide the most accurate picture of where we are?

The tests exist, why not get them rolled out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Spider said:

What I really don’t understand is why they aren’t busting their balls to get an antibody test to everyone in the country.

Surely this will provide the most accurate picture of where we are?

The tests exist, why not get them rolled out?

You don’t need to roll it out to everyone 

A sample of a few tens of thousands would be enough to give you an accurate prediction of the whole country within a small margin of error 

Last I heard, 6% of us have had it, which would mean at least 60%-70% will need to get it for us to approach ‘herd immunity’ 

That’s 30m+ still to go then 

Edited by birch-chorley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
8 minutes ago, birch-chorley said:

 

Last I heard, 6% of us have had it

Where did you hear that

I think its a lot more

Admittedly sample size was only 50, but around 20% tested positive for antibodies

Tgat was probably 6-8 weeks ago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter

Also

Covid accounts for only 7% of all deaths in people under the age of 55.

And 18% of all deaths in people under 65.

Clearly, something has to be done about the oldies to get us back on track.

Shit for them, I know, but they’re the ones it kills in real numbers.

bear in mind - these are mainly the retired or almost retired.

It may seem a bit far fetched, but I’d be asking over 60’s to stay home for the Autumn. Big fines if they don’t.

It is what it is for them I’m afraid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Casino said:

Where did you hear that

I think its a lot more

Admittedly sample size was only 50, but around 20% tested positive for antibodies

Tgat was probably 6-8 weeks ago

I was of the impression it’s 20% in London, 6% nationally 

Think that was a while back though, after the peak mind 

Let me have a dig about 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, gonzo said:

Still no cases on the fylde coast, as been reported on the news this morning. That’s despite having more visitors than anywhere else in the county. 

Numbers falling across England as well. 

 

That's not what they were saying on the news last night. They were saying that the number of cases is on the rise (Of course that may be relative to the number of tests being completed though - I wasn't paying that much attention)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, dave2980 said:

That's not what they were saying on the news last night. They were saying that the number of cases is on the rise (Of course that may be relative to the number of tests being completed though - I wasn't paying that much attention)

New cases are definitely increasing but Gonzo might be referring to the total number infected. 
 

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-51768274

 

Look at daily infections and see how Spain is doing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

41 minutes ago, birch-chorley said:

Statistically speaking, to get accuracy of 99% you need a sample size of just under 20k for a population of 66m 

 

 

They've done over 1.4m antibody tests in total as per yesterdays numbers. That's based on neccessity rather than as part of a representative study, but it's still enough that you'd imagine someone would notice if the number of positives were much higher.

Pretty much every study from comparatively affected countries has come back with similar numbers (5-7%).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.