Jump to content
Wanderers Ways - passion not fashion

Bolton v forest green


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 732
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

You also said yesterday he should change to 4-4-2. He’s come in with a plan and to try and change the mentality. Whether we have the players and whether it comes good we will see. But after one half o

It is a football forum; if folk want to offer their tactical opinions, that's what its for. Just a socially distanced way of getting a defeat off your chest over a few ales with mates. Simpl

As a one off performance I can’t disagree with any of the negative comments being made; Players not living up to their billings, looking tactically naive, no defensive gelling what-so-ever, combinatio

11 minutes ago, meanderson93 said:

I think the key in this system going forwards isn't so much the midfield, it's the wing backs. They should be the ones getting in behind for cut backs or linking with the midfielder and the advanced wider CB to generate the offensive potential. Neither seem to be offering enough in that department so far, the one time we looked dangerous was when Hickman was offering this ability and we dominated, that needs to be happening constantly if this system is going to work. 

The midfield is there as a pivot point and to recycle possession until a defender is drawn out to allow a wing back space. I understand the frustration though and I get why you'd want to see more creativity coming through the middle but I honestly don't think that's supposed to be their job and may be why Crawford hasn't started as often as he should.

I agree and that is why I said we should try Hickman and Mascoll next game.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, meanderson93 said:

Yeah piss the league with at least 4 players out of position.

whose the four???

obviously crawford would play in the hole playing 4312

 

I should not have to say hickman will play on the right

 

 

 

 

ok

 

Crellin gk

rb jones

lb delaney

Zouma c/h

taft c/h

rm hickman

cm sarcevic/Darcy

cm white/tutte

lm moscalli/Gordon

fw crawford/fonz

fw Doyle

Edited by masi 51
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, masi 51 said:

whose the four???

obviously crawford would play in the hole playing 433

Delaney - Left Back? He's the most centre back, centre back that's ever centre backed.

Hickman - You've got in a midfield 3 for some reason, his pace and deliveries would be wasted. Plus can't imagine he'd be disciplined enough central. 

Crawford - Obviously? you've got him out wide there, where sure he'd whip some crosses in but that's not what Doyle is about. Pointless. Also not got the pace for it. 

Delfouneso - Can play wide and would graft but deliveries would be non-existent, prefer his industry close to support Doyle.

Darcy - On the wing? No thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, masi 51 said:

crellin

 Delaney left back, Jones right back. Zouma Taft in the centre

hickman white sarcevic 

fonz/darcy   doyle     crawford

 

piss the league with that team

No chance. As mentioned by Meanderson too many out of position and a completely new system.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, meanderson93 said:

Delaney - Left Back? He's the most centre back, centre back that's ever centre backed.

Hickman - You've got in a midfield 3 for some reason, his pace and deliveries would be wasted. Plus can't imagine he'd be disciplined enough central. 

Crawford - Obviously? you've got him out wide there, where sure he'd whip some crosses in but that's not what Doyle is about. Pointless. Also not got the pace for it. 

Delfouneso - Can play wide and would graft but deliveries would be non-existent, prefer his industry close to support Doyle.

Darcy - On the wing? No thanks.

Options

please tell me who you would have as L/b??

Hickman is too attacking to be a right back and jones is a ideal right back so in my opinion on the little i have seen of him right midfield is ideal

Formation is adaptable

We are debating the way Evatt plays

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, masi 51 said:

Options

please tell me who you would have as L/b??

Hickman is too attacking to be a right back and jones is a ideal right back so in my opinion on the little i have seen of him right midfield is ideal

Formation is adaptable

We are debating the way Evatt plays

The three midfielders in a 4-3-3 are central midfielders.

Hickman can play full-back or wing-back.

Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, RONNIE PHILLIPS said:

Did you all attend the same course at Lilleshall? 🤔

I've got my FAW Football Leaders Level 1 plus 46 years watching BWFC.  That makes me qualified to balloon on a football forum but I'm not allowed to send any letters to the manager😀

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Johnnyrotten said:

In one.  That midfielder being Darcy.  Plus if we only have 4 defenders that's one less defender that's going to make a mistake or give the ball away cheaply.

I admire, but do not share, your conviction that the extra midfielder would not make a mistake or give the ball away cheaply.

By your own argument, we would be guarenteed at least a 0-0 with no defenders on teh field.

We need players who can pass the ball, are confortable on it and know what they are supposed to be doing, before we complain too much about formations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.