Rudy 1,329 Posted January 22 Author Share Posted January 22 (edited) @miamiwhite I’ve asked you this before but are you ever wrong? Or are you ever able to admit when you are. Because honestly I have no doubt you are a good bloke but Jesus you’re arguments on every subject is like arguing with someone with the incapacity to listen to the other side and I know it’s not the case. You’ll post one sided tweets or articles but then pull people up for posting one sided arguments. You need proof, then you don’t trust the source, so will find something to discredit the source Then if you do prove To be wrong it’s oh I was on the wind up or no proper response it’s goodnight luv followed by a string of emojis. Never commit to a statement always leave that ounce of ambiguity to get your way out of the point when someone pulls you up on it You’re like a politician yourself. It's tiring that you seem to be incapable of having a political debate without trying to prove you’re always right. Edited January 22 by Rudy Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Site Supporter Winchester White 271 Posted January 22 Site Supporter Share Posted January 22 I am still confused as to whether it was a windup or not? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DirtySanchez 151 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 Just now, Winchester White said: I am still confused as to whether it was a windup or not? The latter followed by the former once it got past bedtime Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DirtySanchez 151 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 Once he did a quick u-turn Quote Link to post Share on other sites
miamiwhite 1,263 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 52 minutes ago, Rudy said: @miamiwhite I’ve asked you this before but are you ever wrong? Or are you ever able to admit when you are. Because honestly I have no doubt you are a good bloke but Jesus you’re arguments on every subject is like arguing with someone with the incapacity to listen to the other side and I know it’s not the case. You’ll post one sided tweets or articles but then pull people up for posting one sided arguments. You need proof, then you don’t trust the source, so will find something to discredit the source Then if you do prove To be wrong it’s oh I was on the wind up or no proper response it’s goodnight luv followed by a string of emojis. Never commit to a statement always leave that ounce of ambiguity to get your way out of the point when someone pulls you up on it You’re like a politician yourself. It's tiring that you seem to be incapable of having a political debate without trying to prove you’re always right. Listen son, I will commit to any statement I like on here, thank you 😃 The more it winds folk up, the better it is 😄 You should know by now, and also know in real life, I am nothing like I am on here.....thank god 😉 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
little whitt 495 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 2 minutes ago, miamiwhite said: Listen son, I will commit to any statement I like on here, thank you 😃 The more it winds folk up, the better it is 😄 You should know by now, and also know in real life, I am nothing like I am on here.....thank god 😉 ive know him since i was a kid he is a decent lad in real life Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SatanGreavsie 612 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 2 minutes ago, little whitt said: ive know him since i was a kid he is a decent lad in real life Biden? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ani 1,200 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 14 minutes ago, miamiwhite said: Listen son, I will commit to any statement I like on here, thank you 😃 The more it winds folk up, the better it is 😄 You should know by now, and also know in real life, I am nothing like I am on here.....thank god 😉 Tbf you are a cunt in real life too. 😎👍😂😘😜 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
miamiwhite 1,263 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 1 minute ago, Ani said: Tbf you are a cunt in real life too. 😎👍😂😘😜 Feelings mutual twatty 😉 😜 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
miamiwhite 1,263 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 10 minutes ago, SatanGreavsie said: Biden? LW is one of the little ones who Biden kissed on the head. Mind you, LW was 48 at the time . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rudy 1,329 Posted January 22 Author Share Posted January 22 3 minutes ago, miamiwhite said: LW is one of the little ones who Biden kissed on the head. Mind you, LW was 48 at the time . Was he still 4ft? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
miamiwhite 1,263 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 3 minutes ago, Rudy said: Was he still 4ft? He was that height at primary school, just stopped growing for some reason. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Grey 805 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 8 minutes ago, miamiwhite said: He was that height at primary school, just stopped growing for some reason. Was on the ciggis at 6 years old, stunted his growth. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tyldesley_white 169 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 2 hours ago, miamiwhite said: Yes, I mentioned Keystone XL last night. You do know the Keystone pipeline was finished in 2016, its just phase 4 (the XL bit) is open under the hammer mainly because is cross over the Ogallala Aquifer which is the largest fresh water source in the would and covers parts of 8 states. So if i was getting some of my drinking water from there I would not want it either, and I work in the oil and gas game Quote Link to post Share on other sites
miamiwhite 1,263 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 3 minutes ago, tyldesley_white said: You do know the Keystone pipeline was finished in 2016, its just phase 4 (the XL bit) is open under the hammer mainly because is cross over the Ogallala Aquifer which is the largest fresh water source in the would and covers parts of 8 states. So if i was getting some of my drinking water from there I would not want it either, and I work in the oil and gas game Yes, had a look into it. It seems to be the Canadians who are more upset isn't it re the job losses ? Are all the other projects in your industry safe now ? He isn't too keen on franking is he, don't blame him on that to be honest. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
royal white 601 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 2 hours ago, Youri McAnespie said: He later popped all their jimmy-jams in a tumble-dryer for ten minutes so they were nice and toasty, made them all hot cocoa with marshmallows, tucked them all in then beamed 'Over The Moon' onto the 130" telly he'd brought down... Why are The National Guard in such numbers in Washington again? Oh aye, because some reptilian scumfuck promoted the theory of a rigged election and urged 'action'. A call that was heeded and ended in five dead. I'm sure most fulltime military would consider bedding down in a (heated) garage as luxury. Never forgiven them (The National Guard) for what they did to Johnny. "Bullseye!" - what a c*nt. All he wanted was a bite to eat. Something that needs to be looked at. Ridiculous the amount of security personnel they’ve had in Washington the last couple of days. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tyldesley_white 169 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 1 minute ago, miamiwhite said: Yes, had a look into it. It seems to be the Canadians who are more upset isn't it re the job losses ? Are all the other projects in your industry safe now ? He isn't too keen on franking is he, don't blame him on that to be honest. Yea the Canadians what to move more oil that it. Again on fracking the devil is in the detail, he wants to ban fracking on Federal land ( he can do nothing on privet land), and that only for new well, all existing well are still good and wells with existing permits, and that amounts to around only 10% of wells. The ban of Federal land is the least of the fracking industry's issues at the moment, 97 fracking company's went to the wall last year, and the rest owe around 95 billion to the banks, they cant live on the price of oil as it is at the moment, they need 60 to 65 and some need more then that to turn a profit. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tyldesley_white 169 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 2 hours ago, Youri McAnespie said: Why are The National Guard in such numbers in Washington again? Because the boys with the guns don't like big boys with bigger guns Quote Link to post Share on other sites
miamiwhite 1,263 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 6 minutes ago, tyldesley_white said: Yea the Canadians what to move more oil that it. Again on fracking the devil is in the detail, he wants to ban fracking on Federal land ( he can do nothing on privet land), and that only for new well, all existing well are still good and wells with existing permits, and that amounts to around only 10% of wells. The ban of Federal land is the least of the fracking industry's issues at the moment, 97 fracking company's went to the wall last year, and the rest owe around 95 billion to the banks, they cant live on the price of oil as it is at the moment, they need 60 to 65 and some need more then that to turn a profit. Crikey, that's a lot of companies that went to the wall. What's the current price, not checked for a while, was around 52 when I last did. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tyldesley_white 169 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 13 minutes ago, miamiwhite said: Crikey, that's a lot of companies that went to the wall. What's the current price, not checked for a while, was around 52 when I last did. Yea a lot of company's, makes the XL pipeline job loss a mere drop in the ocean WTI 52 Brent 55 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
miamiwhite 1,263 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 2 minutes ago, tyldesley_white said: Yea a lot of company's, makes the XL pipeline job loss a mere drop in the ocean WTI 52 Brent 55 Thanks for that. Hope the POI picks up asap. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tyldesley_white 169 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 2 minutes ago, miamiwhite said: Thanks for that. Hope the POI picks up asap. that what's make me laugh over here , everyone screaming blue murder at OPEC being a cartel, but without them manipulating the price of oil, the US oil would be well and truly fucked The capitalism needs a cartel to make money, the irony is not wasted on me, but it is on them Quote Link to post Share on other sites
miamiwhite 1,263 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 38 minutes ago, tyldesley_white said: that what's make me laugh over here , everyone screaming blue murder at OPEC being a cartel, but without them manipulating the price of oil, the US oil would be well and truly fucked The capitalism needs a cartel to make money, the irony is not wasted on me, but it is on them I've noticed a few people moaning about that online. What's your opinion for the next year or two in the oil industry ? Loads of talk online as always re the African countries, but most never seem to get started. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tyldesley_white 169 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 (edited) 11 minutes ago, miamiwhite said: I've noticed a few people moaning about that online. What's your opinion for the next year or two in the oil industry ? Loads of talk online as always re the African countries, but most never seem to get started. See its people that moan, but not oil executive's 🙂 Its going to tough for the next few years, we've had a pause of 18 months 2 years on major projects (except for LNG) but even that as been slow, so even if a major project was action to day, you would see nothing from it for 4 to 5 years Africa they are looking at and also south America https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/20/business/energy-environment/suriname-oil-discovery.html Oil company are always looking for cheap oil, why pay say $20 a barrel when you can get it somewhere else $1 a barrel, and also it been in the ground for a few million years so what's another 20 to 30, its going nowhere Edited January 22 by tyldesley_white Quote Link to post Share on other sites
miamiwhite 1,263 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 4 minutes ago, tyldesley_white said: See its people that moan, but not oil executive's 🙂 Its going to tough for the next few years, we've had a pause of 18 months 2 years on major projects (except for LNG) but even that as been slow, so even if a major project was action to day, you would see nothing from it for 4 to 5 years Africa they are looking at and also south America https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/20/business/energy-environment/suriname-oil-discovery.html There's some folk i know who are involved with an outfit in Tunisia, but seems a real slow burner like you say. Same with the Nigerian outfit, just all promises,back handers and no actual progress. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.