Poor English on my part. My point was that if SS wants rid of a player then I think it’s more than likely that it will happen. There aren’t many players in L1 that are going to take the risk of hardly playing all season / being a bit part player because they’re very much dependent on the next contract.
Of course there will be some that will just say fuck off im staying here and there’s nothing you can do about it, but I think this idea that they’re under contract so there’s no way we can get rid of them is a bit wide of the mark. It might cost us a bit, we might not get the value for them that we’d ideally like, but if SS is absolutely certain that a player is not in his plans then I’d expect them to leave one way or another, contracted or not.
As for the idea of ripping it up or not. I’m usually pretty lenient and definitely more half full than half empty, but I think that’s part of the problem. So many of them have got away with being ‘nearly men’, they’ve always kept their heads above water by winning enough of the shit games. We get frustrated when they bottle it yet again, but then they beat Northampton and Crawley at home and we think that they’re alright actually and can actually get us somewhere.
In reality, he’s obviously not going to get rid of 20 players, but I really wouldn’t be surprised to see 10 go (incl. returning loans and end of contract). I honestly think it needs to be of that severity to properly change the mindset of this squad - adding 2 or 3 isn’t going to change the underlying problem, it just continues to be be too nice and lenient to the underperforming bunch of bottle jobs.