- Popular Post
mickbrown
-
Posts
19,892 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
51
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Players
Posts posted by mickbrown
-
-
1 hour ago, royal white said:
An old school mate has just completed 28yrs service in the navy today. This is his view on the submarine attack. (Obviously I commentated with a load of rainbow emojis 🌈)
I am certainly not against the intervention against the Iranian regime, and they have certainly not been on the right side of international law. They have funded drone attacks against the Royal Navy through the Houthi rebels in the Red Sea and their regime is one that is not good for international cohesion. The thought of 80 sailors losing their life to a torpedo attack in international waters makes me feel a little bit sick though. They are not responsible for the actions of their government, joined their military due to a sense of immense pride instilled in their education system, but probably had no warning, some would have been in bed, eating, praying, calling home, and after listening to multiple accounts of survivors during the Falklands, coupled with picturing the faces of shipmates, I just feel like the ship could have been disabled without loss of life.
The massive fanny😀
-
Seems the new lass is a Bolton fan. Can just make it out at the end.
-
26 minutes ago, frank_spencer said:
They've got enough money to sort themselves out.
Aye. And I don’t remember any of them going balls deep with the Falklands.
In fact the Israelis were selling the Argies weapons during the conflict. So we owe them sweet fuck all.
-
22 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:
Then we're a nation of cowards and wet wipes.
Get National Service back from 14. TMJ can run it free of charge.
We should be fighting at least a war a year.
Who cares if those orchestrating it are committing ethnic cleansing, or run by a total mad man. Fuck it join in, we still need to show a backbone.
Rule Britannia
I reckon TMGJ has a flag business to wrap the coffins in at Brize Norton
-
1 hour ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:
Which they aren't being allowed to do.
None of them are "canon fodder" neither. We don't treat our servicemen that way.
Anyone that joins nevertheless understands that there may be times when they have to fight.
This isn't about kissing Trump's arse, but about defending nations around Iran, its people, as well as our own.
Too many looking at it through Trump hate spectacles, which whilst understandable, doesn't reveal the full picture.
Why the fuck should we be defending Israel and the Gulf States?
Similarly, should we be in Ukraine too?
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, Spider said:About time we had someone with a backbone, rather than a simpering, boot-kissing nonce who would let every American president gape their bum bum because they’ve got a bigger army.
Our armed forces are there to defend Britain and its interests, not just a bit of cannon fodder for a fat fucking mongoloid to use whenever he wants.
Aye. He’s just Hugh Grant to Billy Bob.
Trump shat all over the ‘special relationship’ when he slapped us with tariffs and pissed over our war dead.
Fuck him, bigly.
-
1 hour ago, gonzo said:
Do people actually think the US is going for Iran because of Terrorism?
Actually?
Will UK troops going to Iran stop arena bombings and knife attacks on our shores?
Will it fuck, it'd make it worse.
Just let the yanks twat the fuckers. They really don't need us.
In one.
-
6 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:
Why is it?
That terrorism is here, on our streets.
In various guises.
Even if it is felt we've haven't can't offer much in terms of offensive effort, then having naval cover as protection should be the minimum.
That terrorism has seen many thousands killed internally.
That terrorism is and has been missiles capable of striking Europe, and the will to use them.
What on earth is weird about wanting to stop that, and protect others and ourselves?
Anything else is fingers in the ears indifference at best, and appeasement at worst.
Take it you’re encouraging your lad to join up then?Or it’s just others folks kids who should be killed?
Like I said, it’s fucking weird.
-
4 hours ago, bolty58 said:
No one is and you know it. So keen to see the worlds biggest sponsor of terrorism obliterated. Oh yes.
So leave the Yanks to it. Why drag our lads into it?
Like I said, it’s fucking weird.
-
Why are folk on here so keen to see British servicemen killed?
It’s fucking weird.
-
56 minutes ago, Marc505 said:
Jesus, 3 shot down to friendly fire in such a short period is unprecedented. I would not want to be the air defence commander on the other end of the phone to whichever US official calls them about this!
Well at least it’s their own lads they are shooting down and not ours
-
18 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:
Dear me, this is a huge conflict.
The damage Iran has achieved is minimal when looking the the number of missiles and drones they had.
Trump warned they would suffer casualties, and so far they have been very small.
It's been months, if not years in the planning, with remarkable levels of intelligence available.
Obviously, there will always be some aspects that could have been done better, but war isn't a precise science, where numbers always add up.
The continued sardonic comments are somewhat ignorant, and are without doubt largely based on the fact that Trump is the President.
The bloke is a cunt, but it is vital to take personal views out of it when making assessments.
So yes, it's actually going pretty well all things considered.
Trump is a massive cunt. Correct
You seriously think an addled cunt like that won’t leave an absolute shitshow and power vacuum behind?
It’ll be fucked for years.
-
27 minutes ago, Dimron said:
Back to his old pal Vlad... Mr Zel must hate not being the centre of world attention
Attention seeking twat getting his country bombed and his civilians murdered.
-
21 minutes ago, bolty58 said:
No answer eh? I'll take it that you think they should have been left alone then.
You’ve made your mind up either way. Crack on
-
10 minutes ago, bolty58 said:
Can we assume that you would have preferred maintaining the status quo?
Never assume. It makes an ass of u and me
-
17 minutes ago, Spider said:
One things for sure
This was entirely about regime change.
Lets hope they’ve considered all the angles because a massive power vacuum has just appeared and we all know how well that can go.
Aye. And absolutely fuck all to do with oil.
So fucking predictable. As will be the inevitable shitshow that follows.
-
The yanks will never learn, the twats
Glad we’ve let them go it alone
-
Missus flying to Dubai this afternoon. Guess that’s that fucked
-
And the cost of energy?
All run by companies whose main goal is to maximise profits for shareholders.
Maybe the Tories privatising everything they could get their grubby fucking hands on wasn't such a great idea afterall.
-
27 minutes ago, Tony said:
Current labour government policy is to accelerate net zero initiatives which are contributing to the UK having some of the highest industrial energy prices in the world. Manufacturing sectors which have high energy requirements are increasing uncompetitive, the Chemical sector in the UK has already been very adversely affected. Jobs will continue to be lost.
The end of new licences in the North Sea is contributing to the continuing loss of jobs in the oil sector (we seem to be OK with paying for gas from the Norwegian sector of the North Sea).
As well as the lost jobs, many of them skilled and well paid, we are reducing out ability to export and increasing our need to import energy and industrial products.
Our mishandling of North Sea oil and gas predates Starmer by absolutely decades.
-
1 hour ago, jmjhb said:
Well, Reform and Labour have said they're the problems to everything so who else would they realistically vote for?
Aye. They seriously expecting Muslims to vote for them?
Moaning cunts.
-
1 hour ago, athywhite1958 said:
It will be interesting to see what demands the local electorate start making
They be like every other local electorate. They’ll ask for nowt and get fuck all.
-
Just wait until Restore start getting involved and splitting the right wing vote even more.
Lovely stuff.
-
59 minutes ago, Tony said:
A very dark day for British democracy, extremists on the left and right with their false promises. Sectarianism and "family voting" widespread.
We will now see after the May elections a leadership challenge with the excereable Starmer being replaced by someone worse from the so called "soft left". In reality left wing extremists driving any remaining manufacturing into oblivion and bankrupting our pubs, restaurants and cafes.
Aye, because the Labour movement was brought about with the intention of destroying industry and manufacturing
The clue is in the name.
Meanwhile in Iran
in Behind The Stands
Posted
By the way, Hesgeth is a cunt of the highest order