Boothy

Fildraw claim £17 million versus the admins £10 million

See the loonies are at it full swing on here and elsewhere today.

Cba

Middlebrook would be spot on for a Nandos. Should get rid of that Burger King and stick one round that end.

Fair play for reading all that from what I said. Quite an imagination you've got there.

Fair play to Mark, was thinking along his lines anyway. I cant see any reason why any of the staff players would still be here, perhaps they forego their dues if they terminate? I wouldn't have thought so.

Forest Green is what?

Not now his stickers gone. Game over.

Diddles fingering his cousin for a Twix. Kermit bothering. SEBnando. Took me a few years to suss JCL and indeed I am a JCL having joined this site in 2007.

Was the a 1958 bwfc top spotted on this Westboro Baptist church programme?

Nervy as fuck

Gst in

Cheers for the good dose of optimism. Come on England!

Nailed on loss now. Can't chase.

I don't think the milkman with glass bottles are quite extinct. Anyway, video man (Ritz video on wheels)

Haha

Hopefully that's enlightened you a little then? Or do you still think Ken masterminded a secured loan against the Club without putting anything in? It would have been easier to call you a thick cunt and leave it at that.

Sluffy, much better when you are being succinct. At the risk of sounding patronising, Tomski, do you know how a loan works? Whilst there was no doubt some benevolent aspect to ED loaning the money to KA, it clearly wasn't without strings. Once ED loaned the money to KA - it was KA's money. Not ED's money. ED didn't put it in the Club, he personally loaned it under some pretext directly to KA, under KA's own personal liability. If he injected some or all of that money into the Club, it is still KA injecting the money - not ED. If he borrowed it from the bank or any other source it would be exactly the same. It is a different scenario altogether if ED loaned the corporate entity money as the liability would be limited to the business.

Carr's Pasties (if they're on the list) are an unsecured creditor. KA is a secured creditor. Hopefully this answers your point? For clarity, I assume you have no problem with the fact that the other secured creditors did indeed put money into the Club?

So it's his liability? Are we in agreement then? Or are you saying someone gave him money to put his name to it and he then invested? People need to stop being so blinkered. Again, I am not saying that he is morally or ethically right or wrong. We all know where he sits on the spectrum.

As Sluffy said, it's there in black and white. I was just replying to the post that implied he hasn't put money in when that clearly is disproved here. I'm not contesting the morals of the bloke or discussing how he came to do it but this proves that he has injected money into the business in order to become a secured creditor.

Because he put something into the Club?

Exactly, boring as fuck people citing employment law. At the end of the day they could have agreed anything and defined a rolling contract however they liked

Parky could just hire Howard to temper everyone's views and make him loved

Hah did think that the post was Sluffyesque in size, if nothing else