Tonge moor green jacket

Good. Stay like that until sheffields customary 95th minute goal.

Innocent until proven guilty. He's probably been advised not too- maybe its not seen as presidential.If as I said before he did it then those women would be doing a massive service for women's rights- far more than the protesters- if they reported it as a crime and took it further. I wonder why they haven't

If he did assault women, then one or more need to go through the legal system and get him prosecuted. I know it's not that easy, but if he's found guilty then he's finished.

Be reet after our new trade deal with the us- come to Britain for your abortion.

Rather not- prefer to use my own.

Personal attacks aren't unique to him though. Neither is attempting to belittle those with an opposing view. We all post 'crap' from time to time; but sometimes its only crap if you don't agree with it.

They are American missiles though- perhaps it just wanted to go home.

They told him to fork off.

Were you cleaning their windows at the time?

He's done a lot right but the ongoing situation with him and dh, the accounts etc are still giving cause for concern. For many his past indiscretions have led to an air of caution which is understandable. So long as he succeeds in getting the club on a stable footing I don't think there'll be too much of a problem.

Of course it is. But they knew that would happen if he was voted in. It was a democratic decision and one they must live with. Plenty won't like it and can express their right to protest against the policy. Just respect the society that provides that right and don't smash it up. Religion and politics are dangerous bedfellows but America has always had more of an influence through faith than here.

Don't see the problem with water cannon- if you're not smashing stuff up you don't get wet. For those that think its their right to hijack a legitimate protest and just seek to damage everything and kick off then they can't grumble if they get hosed. For many it might be the first shower they've had in months.

Yep. As it is they had heaters on the area overnight so its not like he's done nowt and gone on the piss.

With the best will in the world you'd not want any tom, dick, or harry to get a role. Preferably someone with the necessary acumen to undertake the role. If no others came forward and the steering group members got in then fair enough. They need to be businessy if they are to ever get their hands on the club.

Failing to do your job properly doesn't necessarily mean a sacking offence. Depends upon how their disciplinary procedures are worded and how it has been followed. We don't know if he's got previous misdemeanors totting up etc, but they may be on rocky ground if there has been no warnings etc. On the face of it one mistake in 27 years doesn't seem too bad. Especially when it was only a small part of the pitch. Instant dismissals are usually for gross misconduct and the like, so may well be unfair. No one knows the full facts so its difficult to make a judgement. Frank- you'll know from the council that it isn't as simple as that. Whether procedures are weighted to much in any direction is a different matter- companies have procedures and hr departments create them, if they're not followed they could be up shit creek.

Yep. Irrespective of membership numbers, they've gone down the legal route to set themselves up as a supporters trust. Everyone has had the chance, and still does, to go down and offer their opinion. Other groups like ww etc are discussion forums etc but don't have the same status. Dunno if you can have more than one trust- for those very unhappy with the current one, but that would seem daft; just get down and change the current culture. Birch- your couple of guys from ww could only get on the board by being elected by members; therefore you're going to need a lot from here to join- not sure that's going to happen.

Just make sure you price in for everything. Your public liability insurance may need to change etc. Things like how mileage and wear and tear will affect your vehicles and how much sooner they will need replacing. Missus recently had an interview at a place where there was no budgeting for replacement of plant etc.

Agreed. Just tried their website to see board members but it didn't seem to work properly

You'll enjoy the grub then; some normal stuff for weirdos like me, but lots of stuff with grubs and bugs in. Looked really good but there's no bloody way I was eating it. Handling Madagascan cockroaches was interesting as were the stick insects, but you have to be careful with the latter as its easy to snap them.

Don't know if you've been by take a visit to Dr Benyon's bug farm. Only opened last year but an interesting place. The wife ate a deep fried mealworm though- fucking animal.

Did Pembrokeshire last year. A couple of places were busy but found a couple of beaches with few people on. Great countryside etc, and the blue-est sea I've ever seen

Reminds me of the reporter in Aus interviewing a landlord for refusing to let to Asians. The landlord had actually said agents.

As was mentioned earlier the information revealed by the EFL was apparently publicly available, but the bn missed the opportunity to clarify things. According to the bn article ( last week I think) the club had initially denied that we had squad restrictions. Don't know what the truth of all this is but I can't see what harm the clarification from the EFL did. Perhaps I'm being thick. But as said previously ken is an experienced business man and I'm sure he can manage to attentions of the st. I'm sure in the coming years we'll have our eyes opened by stuff that leaks out; from previous and current incumbents. Not convinced entirely buy any of the current parties: but will reserve judgement until things are sorted and become clearer.

Might backfire if the groundsman does then for unfair dismissal. Obviously don't know the full situation, but if every employee got sacked for making a mistake, we'd be fucked.

Any organisation can only represent the views of its members- I presume the st stance has been agreed upon previously (if not the methodology). Plenty aren't happy with them, fair enough, but are you really that bothered? Can only speak for myself but I'm not- what will be will be. If others are and are prepared to give their efforts then fair enough. I don't see ka being overly bothered either, I'm sure he's experienced enough to manage the situation- he'll do what he wants/needs to.