tomski
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by tomski
-
-
-
What part of the 230 mill went back to the clubs?"Certain parts of his reputation are unfair, as he has had more successes than failures, and when you sit down and look at his transfer record over his 26 years as a boss you find that he has spent £222.23 million and recouped £230.37 million."
-
Yes they were in an okay position when he left, perhaps underachieved. But don't buy into this they were bottom with 2 points guff when he took over. They were never gonna finish there. I'll give you diarra but the other 2 he resigned so hard to tell. I think you could actually point at the fact he's very poor at developing players?Spurs were in an okay position when he left.
It's up to the owners of the business to ensure the club is financially sound, not the manager IMO. A lot of the players he signed for Portsmouth were players who would still have a high re-sale value - Crouch, Diarra, Defoe, etc.
-
Edited by tomski
If you look at where spuds finished the season before he came, 5th. He finished 4th a couple of times, only once relevant at a huge spend across the years. Absolute chancer who courts popularity by being the media darling. I think if he was allowed he'd of sold bale and maybe bought chimbonda again for the 50th time.Where were Spurs when he took over, and when he left?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Close Season Arry Watch
in Terrace Talk
I merely want to dispel this myth he's a good manager when he really isn't.