peelyfeet

Anyway. I've had enough of this shite. I've not been on here for a few years and on return, parts of it are very similar to twitter. The influence of shitty media outlets pumping out crap for morons to digest because theyre losing ad revenue to social media is evident. You won't see me here any more. Cya

We already knew he was in Rochdale. Its been in the news for 9 years. The update is that high level negotiations are taking place between the governments to get him deported. The daily mail ran with "look at paedo pizza delivery man's house" GB news picked this up. Christys went on a podcast and parroted it. And you posted it on here like a good boy.

And maybe some of the news outlets repeat the outrage parts of the story over and over and miss out whats actually happening with case because their readers won't click on articles about legal wranglings. Who needs facts on how the deportation negotiations are going when you can get a load of pitchfork waving geniuses riled up about a house being built in a village in Pakistan according to ..."inquiries by MailOnline in his home village of Charhoi" I hope they do an update on how many bedrooms it's got, and how much it cost. Thats what we need to know.

Based on what? My criticism of their reporting style? The conversation on this topic over the last few days clearly shows that their garbage gets through to people and enrages them. What's the update on the story? Is it that the government have held talks with Pakistani ministers or is it that a Rochdale neighbour isn't happy with the paedo having a job and parties? What does the daily mail article tell us that we didn't already know in this 9 year old situation? What does it do to highlight the people involved with the deportation, the reason it's failed and what's happening regarding the likelihood of him being deported soon? That's what we should be concerned about, getting pressure on the people responsible, to get the fucker out of the country. And we can only do that if we're told about what's happening.

Well put. I still hate the daily mail though.

The video that you posted is patrick christys parroting a Daily mail article. Thats what GBnews does. They react to stories published by outlets like the Daily Mail on their TV shows and over social media. The data shows that there are vastly more paedophiles who arent in grooming gangs, than are in them, and because of demographic size, theyre mainly white british. Pakistani Grooming gangs are in the news because some police forces failed to follow up correctly for fear of being branded racist, and because they regarded some of the teenage girls involved to be prostitutes and criminals active in the enrolment of other girls. This doesnt mean most paedos in the UK are muslim rape gangs. Theyre clearly not. And I think the gutter press prey on weaknesses that their readers have. Fear sells mate. Theyre not interested in you gaining knowledge or investigative journalism that uncovers stuff, they're shysters selling tat.

You're regurgitating clickbait mate. I think it's people like you who've got your head in the sand. My mentality is to not take daily mail articles at face value. Have a look on their front page. What amazing investigative stories have the got today? P.s i was replying to a whataboutery argument, hence mine.

Thats because the story is from the daily mail. Some other outlets published the update on the high level talks. But nobody seems very interested in that on here. Wonder why?

Good. They'd still be a tiny minority mate. The overwhelming majority of sexual abuse is one on one, and the perpetrator is usually a relative or known friend, for adults its usually a partner or ex. Whatabout all those victims, the vast majority? How come the papers are full of a tiny % of cases? Do you think a sexual abuse victim cares about what ethnicity or type of abuser category their abuser falls into? I don't.

I see humour in people getting wound up by a daily mail article.

I'm being critical of dumbed down articles written by sensationalist outlets who fail to tell their readers the reason why the story is back in the news. They do this because they rely on ad revenue clickbait for their income instead of informative journalism. Their coverage on this is designed to create rage in their readership, it's not designed to do anything that will help get the scumbag deported, help the girls or inform the readers of the progression of the case. Theyre making money out of fools. According to the Times, child sexual abuse offences committed by groups (2 or more) account for 3.7% of those recorded. Grooming gangs account for 0.6%. Of that 0.6%, 23% are comitted by ethnic minorities.. Even if they're all muslim, which they won't be, this means for every 1,000 child sexual abuse cases 998 of them are not committed by muslim grooming gangs. Wouldn't think so by the % of comments that appear to be pointed in their direction would you? I wonder what influence the gutter press has on this phenomenon?

Asencio has been sent off in 1 match ,gave a penalty away in another and had a howler for their 1st goal tonight. Bad tournament for him. Garcia looks very good though.

Hope he goes Swiss next.

Aye. Liberia Liberty.

To be fair I've not seen it past the first 10 mins. The Bob Hoskins one was pants.