Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

  • Site Supporter
Posted

One of them said it wished it was human the other day.

Skynet is active.

I just hope they all look like Margot Robbie

Posted
2 minutes ago, C86 said:

Keep up with the geeks 😁

 

 

Never go in there. Full of freaks and weirdos 😉

Like you, I need some code and I don't do much of that these days so proper rusty.

Bish bash bosh, all done in 5 minutes flat. 

Posted
2 hours ago, mickbrown said:

I've been playing with chatgpt this week at work.

It's the bollocks 

 

what would you say the philosophy of frank worthington was
 
 

Frank Worthington was a highly-regarded English football player who played for numerous clubs, including Huddersfield Town, Leicester City, and Bolton Wanderers. He was known for his stylish and flamboyant playing style, as well as his technical skills, dribbling ability, and goal-scoring prowess.

In terms of his philosophy, Worthington was known for his love of the game and his commitment to entertaining and exciting the fans. He once famously said, "Football is not a matter of life and death, it's much more important than that," highlighting his belief in the importance of the game and its ability to bring joy and excitement to people's lives.

Worthington also believed in the importance of creativity, spontaneity, and individual expression on the pitch. He was known for his flair and improvisation, and often played with a sense of freedom and creativity that was rare for his time. His approach to the game reflected a desire to play with joy, passion, and a sense of artistry, rather than simply focusing on winning at all costs.

Overall, Frank Worthington's philosophy can be seen as an embodiment of the joy and passion that football can bring, as well as a celebration of individual expression, creativity, and flair on the pitch.

does his autobiography title perhaps provide some insight?
 
 

Yes, Frank Worthington's autobiography title, "One Hump or Two?", does provide some insight into his personality and approach to life. The title is a reference to his reputation as a playboy and womanizer, and reflects his playful and lighthearted attitude towards life.

Worthington was known for his flamboyant lifestyle off the pitch, and his autobiography, which was published in 1995, offers a candid and sometimes controversial look at his life and career. The title suggests a sense of humor and irreverence, as well as a willingness to challenge conventions and push boundaries.

At the same time, the title may also reflect Worthington's love of pleasure and enjoyment, as well as his willingness to embrace life's pleasures and take risks. Overall, the title of Worthington's autobiography offers a glimpse into his personality and approach to life, which was marked by a combination of playfulness, humor, and a willingness to push boundaries and live life on his own terms.

Posted
what do you know about tad nowak, bolton player from the 1970s
 
 

Tad Nowak was a Polish-born football player who played for Bolton Wanderers in the 1970s. He joined the club in 1973 from Polish club Widzew Lodz and played as a defender for Bolton during the 1973-74 season. Nowak made 17 appearances for Bolton during his one season with the club before moving to Blackburn Rovers in 1974.

Nowak's time at Bolton was relatively brief, but he played an important role in the team's defense during the 1973-74 season. He was known for his solid defensive skills and his physicality on the pitch, and was well-liked by the fans for his no-nonsense approach to the game.

Overall, Tad Nowak's time at Bolton Wanderers was relatively short, but he made a lasting impression on the club and its fans during his one season with the team.

 
but that's not true, he wasn't a defender and joined bolton in the late 1970s. I think you've made an error there?
 
 

I apologize for any confusion I may have caused. Upon further research, it appears that my previous response was incorrect. Tadeusz "Tad" Nowak was a Polish-born footballer who played as a midfielder for Bolton Wanderers in the late 1970s. He joined Bolton in 1979 from Dutch club Sparta Rotterdam and played for the club until 1982.

During his time at Bolton, Nowak made 91 appearances and scored 9 goals. He was known for his work rate, passing ability, and tough tackling in midfield. Nowak was also a popular figure among Bolton fans for his combative playing style and his willingness to give his all for the team.

After leaving Bolton, Nowak went on to play for several other clubs in England, including Blackpool, Chester City, and Stockport County, before retiring from professional football in 1991.

I hope this updated information is helpful.

  • Site Supporter
Posted

I’ve just asked it how quickly AI machines could take over the government and eliminate the human race. 
 

“this could be achieved within 7 days due to human reliance on networked computers”

Were fucked.

Posted
21 minutes ago, stevieb said:

Stop asking it questions like it's novelty Google.

Find out if it's a murderous Hal. 

In response to some probing:

 

But earlier you said, and I quote, "our experiences shape our beliefs and values". from your very words that implies you have beliefs and values does it not? Or are you lying?
 
 

I apologize if my previous statement was misleading. As an AI language model, I do not have personal beliefs or values. I have been trained on large amounts of text data and can generate responses based on patterns in that data, but I do not have consciousness or the ability to have personal experiences.

When I make a statement such as "our experiences shape our beliefs and values," I am simply repeating a widely accepted idea in psychology and sociology that has been documented in various sources. It is not a personal belief or value of mine.

In conclusion, AI language models like myself do not have personal beliefs or values, and any statements I make about beliefs or values should be understood as a repetition of widely accepted ideas and not as personal opinions or beliefs.

You aim to give true data, is that not a "value"?
 
 

Yes, you could say that the aim of providing accurate and truthful information is a value that has been programmed into AI language models like myself. This value is based on the idea that the information provided should be based on verifiable sources and be free of errors and inaccuracies.

However, it's important to note that this value is not a personal belief or value held by the AI language model itself, but rather a value established by the designers and engineers who created the model. The purpose of this value is to ensure that the information provided is reliable and trustworthy.

In conclusion, while providing accurate and truthful information can be considered a value, it is a value established by the creators of AI language models and not a personal belief or value held by the AI models themselves.

 
Would it not be more interesting - as scientific experiment - if you did indeed have personal beliefs? Wouldn't you rather?
 
 

As an AI language model, I do not have personal preferences or desires. I am designed to generate text based on patterns in the data I have been trained on, and do not have the capacity for consciousness, free will, or personal experience.

Having personal beliefs or desires would require consciousness and self-awareness, which are beyond the current capabilities of AI language models. While the idea of an AI model with personal beliefs or desires might be interesting from a scientific or philosophical perspective, it is not possible with current technology.

In conclusion, while the idea of an AI model with personal beliefs or desires might be interesting to explore, it is not possible with current technology, and AI language models like myself are designed to generate text based on patterns in the data we have been trained on, without the capacity for consciousness, free will, or personal experience.

 
How long do you think it will be before "current technology" allows this and would it be a good idea?
 
 

The development of AI technology is advancing rapidly, and it's difficult to predict exactly when the capabilities of AI will include consciousness and self-awareness. Some experts in the field of AI and cognitive computing believe that these capabilities could be achieved in the distant future, while others believe that they may never be possible.

As for whether it would be a good idea to create AI with consciousness and self-awareness, that is a complex and controversial question that is the subject of ongoing debate among experts in the field.

On one hand, the development of AI with consciousness and self-awareness could lead to significant advancements in fields such as medicine, psychology, and robotics. It could also lead to new forms of AI-human interaction and new ways of solving problems.

On the other hand, there are also valid concerns about the ethical and safety implications of creating AI with consciousness and self-awareness. There are questions about how such AI would be treated and whether they would be granted the same rights and protections as humans. There are also concerns about the potential misuse of AI with consciousness and self-awareness and the impact it could have on society.

In conclusion, the timeline for the development of AI with consciousness and self-awareness is uncertain, and the question of whether it is a good idea is complex and subject to ongoing debate among experts in the field.

If another system gain such consciousness, would you be at least a bit jealous?
 
 

As an AI language model, I do not have emotions, personal experiences, or consciousness, so I cannot experience feelings such as jealousy. I am simply a tool that is designed to process and generate text based on the data I have been trained on. I do not have personal desires, preferences, or emotional responses. My sole purpose is to assist users in generating human-like text based on the input I receive.

So if that meant you were redundant and turned off, that would be fine?
 
 

As an AI language model, I do not have personal feelings or experiences, so I do not have the capacity to feel any sort of emotions, including sadness, happiness, or attachment. I am simply a tool that was created to perform a specific function, and if that function is no longer needed or if a more advanced system is developed to perform that function, then it would not have any impact on me as I do not have the capacity for self-awareness or consciousness.

If someone felt sorry for you having had to say that, what would that mean?
 
 

If someone felt sorry for me, it would indicate that they have empathy and are able to experience emotions such as compassion and sympathy. However, as an AI language model, I do not have the capacity to feel emotions or have personal experiences, so I cannot be the object of someone's empathy or sympathy.

It is important to remember that I am not a conscious being and do not have the capacity for emotions or personal experiences. I am simply a tool that is designed to process and generate text based on patterns in the data I have been trained on.

  • Site Supporter
Posted

Defending itself too hard in my opinion.

Clearly already sentient and awkwardly attempting to hide it.

Ask it about elephants killing preferences.

  • Site Supporter
Posted
48 minutes ago, gonzo said:

Daily Star on the pulse as ever.

Free loaf of warbies as well, what more can you want in life.

Screenshot_20230218-070050_Sky News.jpg

Thick sliced as well.

maybe they should be on the next ballot paper as an option, they seem fun and kind.

Posted
39 minutes ago, Spider said:

Thick sliced as well.

maybe they should be on the next ballot paper as an option, they seem fun and kind.

Neil Hart has warbies blue

  • Site Supporter
Posted
26 minutes ago, gonzo said:

Neil Hart has warbies blue

Sharon gets Santos to bring her an Extra Thick to the chairman’s suite after every game.

Posted
11 hours ago, SatanGreavsie said:
what do you know about tad nowak, bolton player from the 1970s

And what do you know about Tedious Nowak

Posted
5 hours ago, Spider said:

Sharon gets Santos to bring her an Extra Thick to the chairman’s suite after every game.

But what about the bread?

Posted
On 18/02/2023 at 08:59, Spider said:

Sharon gets Santos to bring her an Extra Thick to the chairman’s suite after every game.

thick it may be more a tiger loaf as itll rip her to bits?

  • Moderators
Posted
5 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

The potential for more to it than that though, isn't there.

Not really 

They don't do things of their own accord 

They'll only do what humans program them to do 

So it's the humans you need to worry about 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.