Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

The Name’s Bond


globaldiver

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, mickbrown said:

My dad bought shares years back.

Pretty sure he lost every penny when Eddie Davies got involved.

So in short. Fuck that.

It’s completely different this time to be fair. I agree on the sentiment though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
1 hour ago, mickbrown said:

My dad bought shares years back.

Pretty sure he lost every penny when Eddie Davies got involved.

So in short. Fuck that.

Myth this

Hed lost every penny before ED arrived

Bought at about 40p

They were worthless when ED bought em

Less than a penny each

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Casino said:

Myth this

Hed lost every penny before ED arrived

Bought at about 40p

They were worthless when ED bought em

Less than a penny each

Fair enough.

Couldn't remember the ins and out. Would he have had any say if he sold them or not?

Point stands, he lost the lot  And my initial opinion stands. Fuck that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

Dunno how it works pal, but im not sure he did have a choice

 

This bond thing is different

If im right, if you pay a grand, then each year you get 85 quid

so 425 quid 

Theres also a promtion bonus

Only way you dont get 142.5% of your money back is if we go bust within 5 years

I think @globaldiver

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Casino said:

Dunno how it works pal, but im not sure he did have a choice

 

This bond thing is different

If im right, if you pay a grand, then each year you get 85 quid

so 425 quid 

Theres also a promtion bonus

Only way you dont get 142.5% of your money back is if we go bust within 5 years

I think @globaldiver

 

I think so. Haven’t read the details, but I’d imagine that many will resist, having been burned 25 year ago, or whenever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Casino said:

Dunno how it works pal, but im not sure he did have a choice

 

This bond thing is different

If im right, if you pay a grand, then each year you get 85 quid

so 425 quid 

Theres also a promtion bonus

Only way you dont get 142.5% of your money back is if we go bust within 5 years

I think @globaldiver

 

Aye, this is right. It's like investing in any bond. It's risk Vs reward. My only problem with this really is that judgement could be clouded because it's BWFC and these investments should only really be sold to folk who understand the product they are buying fully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Subsequent to the announcement of the Wanderers Bond on Thursday 11 May, we have held discussions with the club regarding entry level funding. 
 
We want the bond to be as inclusive as possible so are looking at an option that would facilitate involvement via the Supporters’ Trust.
 
With this in mind, we would like to establish the level of interest before developing any such scheme in more detail and to ask members to have their input by completing the short survey on the link below.
 
 
Individual involvement in the bond scheme is available as published at an entry level of £500 and this proposal would be in addition to the original scheme as detailed on the Tifosy website on https://www.tifosy.com/raises/pre-register-for-the-wanderers-bond
 
We would also highlight the comment on the Tifosy website as follows:
 
“Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment and you are unlikely to be protected if something goes wrong”
 
The bottom line on any type of investment scheme like this is to take independent financial advice if you have any reservations. 
 
Thank you for your support!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why the fuck would you be arsed for £40 fucking hell. It’s like rinsing folk to the max. 
 

really pisses me off the way clubs go for money via the heart strings. Widnes do it as well. Loads of people with fuck all donating because it’s their club. If it is that good a deal surely these Swiss fellas would whack £5m in for £7.5m back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

I see shortland had had his say on faceache

Tbf, his issue is more that its not as good as it looks due to inflation

Questioning what 1400 quid will actually look like in 5 years

The clown hes replied to is just whining that bwfc are ripping off the vulnerable

Reckons hes reported em somewhere or other

 

How clear does the warning need to be

 

Id say them all but saying

Beware it might turn to shit, is pretty clear

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Casino said:

I see shortland had had his say on faceache

Tbf, his issue is more that its not as good as it looks due to inflation

Questioning what 1400 quid will actually look like in 5 years

The clown hes replied to is just whining that bwfc are ripping off the vulnerable

Reckons hes reported em somewhere or other

 

How clear does the warning need to be

 

Id say them all but saying

Beware it might turn to shit, is pretty clear

That clown has one big motherfcuker chip on his shoulder, banging on about Burnden Leisure and our owners are obviously skint 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
14 hours ago, Traf said:

The Trust are trying to assemble a group of investors for the Bond at £100 per person.

What happened to their high net worth individuals?

£100 is a night out, not an investment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Casino said:

I see shortland had had his say on faceache

Tbf, his issue is more that its not as good as it looks due to inflation

Questioning what 1400 quid will actually look like in 5 years

Which is literally the point of a bond, a bet that inflation will be lower than the coupon rate over the period and that the borrower will be good for the money at the end. 

What a weapon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
35 minutes ago, RoadRunnerFan said:

Which is literally the point of a bond, a bet that inflation will be lower than the coupon rate over the period and that the borrower will be good for the money at the end. 

What a weapon.

i hate to do this, but im nearly up for defending him

 

ive only read it once but it didnt seem to be his usual anti club balls

the other loon who signed off 'retired ifa' was the one who reckoned hed made an official complaint

prob founder menber of anti quick quid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter

"The fca considers this to be a high risk"

8.5% is decent at the moment, but requires the club to make some decent wedge. 

I suppose (if it's allowed) the club could still honour the bond even if it isn't making the requisite returns by shareholders coughing up thenselves- BD might be able to shed some light on that.

Can't decide if it is a sign of optimism from the board, or a gamble to get the money in and get to the championship that bit quicker. Or both.

Good luck to those investing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Casino said:

i hate to do this, but im nearly up for defending him

 

ive only read it once but it didnt seem to be his usual anti club balls

the other loon who signed off 'retired ifa' was the one who reckoned hed made an official complaint

prob founder menber of anti quick quid

It says in big letters at the bottom of every piece of literature don't put in unless you are prepared to lose all the money you invest. I might stick in the minimum out of sentiment. I won't be tipping up in the hope of getting rich on the back of it. 

Folk know what the deal is and you know how Shortland rolls. Give yer head a wobble man. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People defending this to the hill because it’s BWFC. It’s a ridiculous thing and if it was value these money men would be all over it. 
 

hopefully it is a sign we are going to be championship bound soon and they will be looking to sell with folk waiting in the wings. 
 

I agree it tells folk they could lose the money but Auntie Sharon doesn’t say that so folk won’t think they can. Az it bin dun and the other simpletons will whack money in and get stung somewhere. Which isn’t right. Folk went mental over wonga but question this and people think you are mental

with a return of 50% in 5 years surely whacking 5 million in for one of our millionaire owners makes sense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.