Meanwhile in France

[bolty58]

9 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

He got paid off them in 2015 and 16 for a couple of interviews or some such. Well before they were booted off air.

The mp made accusations much later in parliament, and apparently claimed he had received over half a million from them. Complete bollocks apparently as that figure was the total earnings for the year for Farage's company.

In short, the mp got his facts wrong and knows it and certainly won't make the accusations again in public. 

It seems though that shit sticks.

It should be fairly easy for the authorities to ascertain if the money was made illegally, but in the years since, nothing. 

Also read now that Farage has instructed lawyers to sue the bank- guess we'll see how that goes.

Something needs sorting as it seems hundreds and hundreds of people are having their accounts closed and no reasons given. A ridiculous state of affairs that any person can be subject to such behaviour, without recourse or even made aware of any supposed evidence.

..and what an obnoxious bastard he really is. Scumbag who wouldn't dare repeat that outside of parliamentary privilege.

[L/H White]

firefighter dead trying to put a fire out 

[gonzo]

Frogs would deffo win the rioting World Cup.

[FrancisFogarty]

1 hour ago, gonzo said:

Frogs would deffo win the rioting World Cup.

Unless incendiary items/flares were banned.

[Tonge moor green jacket]

Th'Argies do a decent riot. 

Just had a read and during the political/economic troubles in 2001, some 39 were killed, including 9 kids.

Then some of the African lot, where life is cheap, kinell.

[wanderer1984]

 

Another attack on the innocent by the religion of peace.

[Zico]

27 minutes ago, wanderer1984 said:

 

Another attack on the innocent by the religion of peace.

An Isis person who the authorities knew all about apparently but hadn't been able to follow up on concerns raised about him 

Wouldn't be surprised if the extremists plan something big for the Olympics 

[wanderer1984]

20 minutes ago, Zico said:

An Isis person who the authorities knew all about apparently but hadn't been able to follow up on concerns raised about him 

Wouldn't be surprised if the extremists plan something big for the Olympics 

I'd hope not but probably only a matter of time before a major event is targeted. Maybe they'll be angry women are taking part.

Weird that some would rather have and welcome those that pose a potential threat to our western values and society over gammons raising issues with their backwards ideologies.

Anyway ... I'm waffling and I'm a tit.

[Lt. Aldo Raine]

He'd previously spent four years in prison having been convicted of planning a similar terrorist attack

[crawshawbooth]

Dont put your head above the parapet as this is a one off 

Never happened before

Nothing to see here you immigrant hating scumbag

Only Doctors  . Surgeons and Nuclear engineers in those dingys 

The dumb . racist scumbag gammon on here are unbelieevable

 

 

 

[London Wanderer]

Who’s said we should be welcoming terrorists? 

[royal white]

7 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

Who’s said we should be welcoming terrorists? 

Who’s said that someone said we should be welcoming terrorists? 

[London Wanderer]

Few posts above

All a bit sad really. An attack happens and posters can’t wait to get on here and score points.
 

Nobody has said we should welcome people that pose a threat, but there’s another terror attack so let’s blame anyone & everyone who‘s a bit more pro immigration.

For me the blame lies with the police here. Four years for planning a terror attack is scarily soft. 

[royal white]

1 hour ago, London Wanderer said:

Few posts above

All a bit sad really. An attack happens and posters can’t wait to get on here and score points.
 

Nobody has said we should welcome people that pose a threat, but there’s another terror attack so let’s blame anyone & everyone who‘s a bit more pro immigration.

For me the blame lies with the police here. Four years for planning a terror attack is scarily soft. 

Nope, no one mentioning terrorists above. Could you be more specific 

[MickyD]

1 hour ago, London Wanderer said:

Who’s said we should be welcoming terrorists? 

 

1 hour ago, royal white said:

Who’s said that someone said we should be welcoming terrorists? 

 

17 minutes ago, royal white said:

Nope, no one mentioning terrorists above. Could you be more specific 

9 hours ago, wanderer1984 said:

I'd hope not but probably only a matter of time before a major event is targeted. Maybe they'll be angry women are taking part.

Weird that some would rather have and welcome those that pose a potential threat to our western values and society over gammons raising issues with their backwards ideologies.

Anyway ... I'm waffling and I'm a tit.

For ease of following the thread.

[royal white]

8 minutes ago, MickyD said:

 

 

For ease of following the thread.

So not terrorists then 👍 

[London Wanderer]

Scrolling Wways letter by letter, must have been a busy night 

 

[London Wanderer]

27 minutes ago, MickyD said:

 

 

For ease of following the thread.

👍

[royal white]

9 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

Scrolling Wways letter by letter, must have been a busy night 

 

Hardly, just read the “few posts above” this morning. 

[London Wanderer]

32 minutes ago, royal white said:

Hardly, just read the “few posts above” this morning. 

Glad you found what you needed Sherlock x

[Tonge moor green jacket]

Known terrorists wouldn't be let in (legally).

That isn't what was stated though.

 

[Lt. Aldo Raine]

7 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Known terrorists wouldn't be let in (legally).

That isn't what was stated though.

 

Yes, posing a threat to Western values and society needn't have to mean terrorism

[bolty58]

Always the same ones leaping to the defence of the indefensible. Alternatively saying nowt.

The West has stupidly allowed this cancer to live amongst us and, sooner or later, it will have to be addressed - most likely in a way which some of the faint hearts will find terribly upsetting.

Blair, Merkel and plenty of others have a lot to answer for.

 

[Tonge moor green jacket]

14 minutes ago, bolty58 said:

Always the same ones leaping to the defence of the indefensible. Alternatively saying nowt.

The West has stupidly allowed this cancer to live amongst us and, sooner or later, it will have to be addressed - most likely in a way which some of the faint hearts will find terribly upsetting.

Blair, Merkel and plenty of others have a lot to answer for.

 

This is what concerns me.

How the hell they put the cat back in the bag I don't know.

We've now got (only) the odd mp seemingly basing their politics around Islam, and not the traditional secular approach, which must be raising alarm bells.

How do you pass laws to prevent it, without judiciary intervening?

Obviously politicians and judiciary should have a good degree if separation, but at some point if the latter continue to stifle the elected former, then there is the risk of scenes witnessed in Dublin spreading all over.

Which in turn will give rise to a more polarised parliament and extreme policies.

[Lt. Aldo Raine]

Interestingly, I see France has just ignored the ruling of the ECHR and deported an Uzbek national with links to terrorism