This is going to be a tough one as they will be up for it and try to rough us up but hopefully we will make more of an effort than we did at their place.

There’s also a rail replacement service from Manchester to Bolton for anyone travelling that route.

fuck me that looks an attacking line up.

think we're trying to win on aggregate.

2 minutes ago, masi 51 said:

who is on the left???

Has to be JDC or Desmond. No Murphy on the bench either. 

5 minutes ago, burnden said:

 

4312?

Well, another unexpected line up.

2-6-2

 

2 minutes ago, maaarsh said:

We look a bit light in centre midfield...

Do we?

3 minutes ago, masi 51 said:

who is on the left???

JOT and Collins

1 minute ago, wanderer1984 said:

4312?

I think so. 

The 3 in midfield and Randall off Collins and Mcatee?

Baxter back in 

2 minutes ago, paulhanley said:

Has to be JDC or Desmond. No Murphy on the bench either. 

looks weak....hope desmond tracks back

Just now, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

JOT and Collins

If it's 3 at the back, then DC must be one.

Seems a bit odd with Jones and Forrester on the bench.

If it's 4 at the back then JOT must be left back, which is another one from left field.

Just now, Tonge moor green jacket said:

If it's 3 at the back, then DC must be one.

Seems a bit odd with Jones and Forrester on the bench.

If it's 4 at the back then JOT must be left back, which is another one from left field.

It's a definite four

Looking at that line-up, I think playing out from the back will be kept to a minimum today

COYWM

9 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

If it's 3 at the back, then DC must be one.

Seems a bit odd given that he is shit 

Edited for Wooli

COYFWM

Hated these cants since Kevin Francis 

13 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

If it's 3 at the back, then DC must be one.

Seems a bit odd with Jones and Forrester on the bench.

If it's 4 at the back then JOT must be left back, which is another one from left field.

It must be a 433 looking at the line up but I'm not a fan of Tutu at LB if I'm honest. Against Birmingham he looked great attacking but I don't want him near our box.

Oh well, let's go all out, 5-4 win

26 minutes ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

Do we?

What did you think the ... meant?

Given all the issues playing 2 against 3 in the middle, picking potentially 4 is a fun change.

It’s definitely 4 at the back. You don’t go makeshift in the back 3 if you’ve got those options on your bench.

I’m going to put it out there - GT left back.

Might be completely wrong but I don’t see how it works otherwise.

JDC Forino Toal GT

Morley Sheehan

Tutu Randall Collins

McAtee

Could be made to look silly in 23 mins and Tutu is left back. I’m not sure which scares me most!

352/532/541 with GT alongside Toal & Forino as three cb’s.

Randall and Collins playing around / either side of Mcatee 

3 minutes ago, caffers said:

352/532/541 with GT alongside Toal & Forino as three cb’s.

Randall and Collins playing around / either side of Mcatee 

No way you’re sticking Forrester on the bench to have GT at centre back instead!

Yer pyramid is shite … 

Some might say horses for courses 

Some might say bingo machine 

I like the look of it though

1 minute ago, Zico said:

Some might say horses for courses 

Some might say bingo machine 

I like the look of it though

bingo horses

I also like it.

2 minutes ago, Zico said:

Some might say horses for courses 

Some might say bingo machine 

I like the look of it though

It's only a bingo machine if we lose 🙂

I’m praying everyone has the game of their lives in that line up.