after watching last night it seems to me that it is a sad idicament of the english game at the moment that he is our 3rd/4th choice striker. people have already posted on here how he looked out of his depth, but it was worth than that!
its fair to say by now that we have a fair idea of what capello looks for in one of his strikers. hence, him discarding owen
quicker than he did than when he was at real madrid.
someone who will ruffle defenders' feathers, lead the line well, be able to hold the ball up and relieve( if necessary) some pressure off the back 4, win free kicks around the edge of the opponents box,run the channels, BE GOOD IN THERE AIR and have something that resembles a bit of pace(as opposed to crouch who who reminds me of spazzy daz on smack, no offence meant...........to daz)
how many times last night did the ball get played upto the yard of pi$$, he caught it on his chest then seemed to inadvertantly
dislocate his knee cap and the ball comes of his shin, possesion lost!
anyway, heres my point. Ive never been a a "fan" of emile heskey, and inspight of critics claiming he never scores enough goals and he has to many "off" days, i can understand why managers continue to pick him because of what he gives to the team as that is the way that capello likes to play.
So with another friendly in 6 weeks, why not gives davies a chance??
all the qualities i mentioned above, he has. much more than crouch anyway and i think alot of people would be surprised at what an able understudy to heskey he would be. as opposed to crouch who is only interested in loitering(like a pervert on queens park) at the back stick for balls floated over.
English strikers in our game are few and far between, much less choice than we have in other positions across the pitch, so he must surely be given a shot??
i mean, jseus christ i saw more of an aeriel threat when robert fleck was at our place than i see in crouch, and fleck was larger in width than he was in chuffin height!!
peter crouch!
after watching last night it seems to me that it is a sad idicament of the english game at the moment that he is our 3rd/4th choice striker. people have already posted on here how he looked out of his depth, but it was worth than that!
its fair to say by now that we have a fair idea of what capello looks for in one of his strikers. hence, him discarding owen
quicker than he did than when he was at real madrid.
someone who will ruffle defenders' feathers, lead the line well, be able to hold the ball up and relieve( if necessary) some pressure off the back 4, win free kicks around the edge of the opponents box,run the channels, BE GOOD IN THERE AIR and have something that resembles a bit of pace(as opposed to crouch who who reminds me of spazzy daz on smack, no offence meant...........to daz)
how many times last night did the ball get played upto the yard of pi$$, he caught it on his chest then seemed to inadvertantly
dislocate his knee cap and the ball comes of his shin, possesion lost!
anyway, heres my point. Ive never been a a "fan" of emile heskey, and inspight of critics claiming he never scores enough goals and he has to many "off" days, i can understand why managers continue to pick him because of what he gives to the team as that is the way that capello likes to play.
So with another friendly in 6 weeks, why not gives davies a chance??
all the qualities i mentioned above, he has. much more than crouch anyway and i think alot of people would be surprised at what an able understudy to heskey he would be. as opposed to crouch who is only interested in loitering(like a pervert on queens park) at the back stick for balls floated over.
English strikers in our game are few and far between, much less choice than we have in other positions across the pitch, so he must surely be given a shot??
i mean, jseus christ i saw more of an aeriel threat when robert fleck was at our place than i see in crouch, and fleck was larger in width than he was in chuffin height!!