Rembrandt Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 They're can kick off all they want. It's not them that have to pay the wages to keep the club afloat No, it is us who'll have to pay. Board to organise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rembrandt Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 They're can kick off all they want. It's not them that have to pay the wages to keep the club afloat No, it is us who'll have to pay. Board to organise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweep Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 No, it is us who'll have to pay. Board to organise. This transfer fee, if it is £2M is possibly more than we'll generate in gate receipts this season. Even with this money, I'll bet we're still massively short on the wage bill. So sadly, anybody we can sell, we will, it's OK arguing we should demand more, but in Holdings case we needed to cash in and not risk him leaving for nothing.  I've said it before, this season is about the club surviving first and foremost, whilst we still have some of the high earners here, that's still going to be a challenge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted July 22, 2016 Site Supporter Share Posted July 22, 2016 Can somebody just nick Mark Davies, ride him ragged around some council estates and then burn him out on some playing fields at the end of the night? He'd fuckin break down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Youri McAnespie Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomski Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 It pretty much matches Reems sale to Fulham. That was used for wages aswell.Different owners and situation. It might be the case but don't know for definite Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 This transfer fee, if it is £2M is possibly more than we'll generate in gate receipts this season. Even with this money, I'll bet we're still massively short on the wage bill. So sadly, anybody we can sell, we will, it's OK arguing we should demand more, but in Holdings case we needed to cash in and not risk him leaving for nothing.  I've said it before, this season is about the club surviving first and foremost, whilst we still have some of the high earners here, that's still going to be a challenge  I get all that but every penny extra helps us get back up the leagues we've not got anywhere near a true market value getting relegated ment we couldn't offer him what he's worth and the state ED left us in means we're just fire fighting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rembrandt Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 This transfer fee, if it is £2M is possibly more than we'll generate in gate receipts this season. Even with this money, I'll bet we're still massively short on the wage bill. So sadly, anybody we can sell, we will, it's OK arguing we should demand more, but in Holdings case we needed to cash in and not risk him leaving for nothing.  I've said it before, this season is about the club surviving first and foremost, whilst we still have some of the high earners here, that's still going to be a challenge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rembrandt Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016  This transfer fee, if it is £2M is possibly more than we'll generate in gate receipts this season. Even with this money, I'll bet we're still massively short on the wage bill. So sadly, anybody we can sell, we will, it's OK arguing we should demand more, but in Holdings case we needed to cash in and not risk him leaving for nothing.  I've said it before, this season is about the club surviving first and foremost, whilst we still have some of the high earners here, that's still going to be a challenge I agree. Just pointing out that wages will have to come from fan income - there's no other meaningful income. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickbrown Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 I know it shouldn't and it's good for the lad but this depresses me a we bit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Ratwhite Posted July 23, 2016 Author Site Supporter Share Posted July 23, 2016 I don't know - £2,000,000 in the bank means a lot to us at the moment. Especially for a player who is out of contract in less than 12 months. You need a lot of things in order to get out of this league - and I'd argue that a relatively inexperienced ball playing central defender at 20 years old is pretty far down the list. This - with big fucking bells on!  We're in Division 3 folks. There's no comparison whatsoever to made with Hanley (4/5 seasons under his belt), also no one knows what agreements/clauses/add ins have been inserted in the deal. KA (formerly swears Ken), appears to be a good negotiator, I'm actually warming to the chap.  Christ, some folk need to wobble there heads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted July 23, 2016 Moderators Share Posted July 23, 2016 I agree. Just pointing out that wages will have to come from fan income - there's no other meaningful income. Â Â did we end up not owning the hotel? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter only1swanny Posted July 23, 2016 Site Supporter Share Posted July 23, 2016 This - with big fucking bells on! Â We're in Division 3 folks. There's no comparison whatsoever to made with Hanley (4/5 seasons under his belt), also no one knows what agreements/clauses/add ins have been inserted in the deal. KA (formerly swears Ken), appears to be a good negotiator, I'm actually warming to the chap. Â Christ, some folk need to wobble there heads. There will likely be some whopping clauses to the deal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 There will likely be some whopping clauses to the deal  Hope your right but this is Bolton your talking about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagermoot Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 We'll get a pre game at thr emerates cup next season against the under 18s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ani Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 I have heard we can take any of their reserves on loan whenever we want, in football world it is known as the Cahill Clause. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweep Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 I have heard we can take any of their reserves on loan whenever we want, in football world it is known as the Cahill Clause. If we don't have to pay their wages that would be a good deal....if we do, then it's a non starter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagermoot Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 The players all get a free sticker book if he makes it into a panini collection Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc505 Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 Zach Clough's dad loves a cryptic tweet doesn't he? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kent_white Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 Zach Clough's dad loves a cryptic tweet doesn't he? Come on then - spill th'beans Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc505 Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 Come on then - spill th'beans  He probably loves it as it gets people talking (like this), but some examples from the last 24 hours or so...  "Life is simple, don't make it complicated #£"  "It looks like it's going to be a bite my tongue night #ZachClough"  "Opposite of virtue is vice"   Could be related to a Clough injury, a possible transfer or neither, but it certainly gets him the attention I'm sure he's looking for! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kent_white Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 Does he get his ears from his mums side or his dad's side? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rembrandt Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 did we end up not owning the hotel? Is it making a meaningful profit ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter HomerJay Posted July 24, 2016 Site Supporter Share Posted July 24, 2016 Yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 Holding fee was 2.5 million for those who believe Nixon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.