Whites man Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 RoadRunnerFan MAAT, ACMA, CGMA Do yourself a favour and google what those letters after my name mean. CGMA is Cock Gives Men AIDS, not sure about the other 2, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ex_midlandwhite Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Give it a rest mate, you have no idea what you are talking about. (that's amied Gudni not Hunt). I'm going to respect the wishes of most members and leave this well alone now. I don't disagree with you on the write down of player valuations not being cash items, though the fact we rarely recover and transfer fees helps explain the losses. However Eddie did analysis of the cash flow statements over the same period and the net cash flow out of EDs companies gets very close to the £150m mark if I recall correctly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonzo Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 CGMA is Cock Gives Men AIDS, not sure about the other 2, I much prefer DVDA , OWO and Facesitting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweep Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 I much prefer DVDA , OWO and Facesitting not forgetting ATM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveTheRave Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Emile Heskey BBC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 The worry has to be that the new owners couldn't find 100k to play Spearing. WTF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Carlos Posted March 13, 2016 Moderators Share Posted March 13, 2016 Or they don't think it offers value for money. That's a League One player for a season, for what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Or they don't think it offers value for money. That's a League One player for a season, for what? I get that but what they going to do with him? The choice is pay the 100k and play him or pay him 20k to sit at home for the next 18 months. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Carlos Posted March 13, 2016 Moderators Share Posted March 13, 2016 Fuck knows but it's pure speculation to say we can't find 100K, ergo not very worrying at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveTheRave Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 I think the deal is if he plays more than 50% of games in a season we have to pay Liverpool more. Could be wrong but he got loaned out last season just before he hit 50% of the games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomski Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Deano and co only been in a couple days. Perhaps they wanted to assess things before paying out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweep Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 The worry has to be that the new owners couldn't find 100k to play Spearing. WTF. in all fairness they might want to assess the situation before they decide to dole out £100K I'm sure even before yesterday's game they are already resigned to us starting next season a division down. If they're confident they can shift him on before the start of next season, then we won't be seeing him in a white shirt again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweep Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 In fact I think I'm quite glad they didn't just blindly pay it out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blondi Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 We're down anyway, so we may as well save the 100K and keep it towards Lennon's compensation at the end of the season. We could always loan Spearing out next season or try and give him away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadRunnerFan Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 CGMA is Cock Gives Men AIDS, not sure about the other 2, Lets be clear. I only give BAD AIDS, I'm a proper wrong 'un. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwfcfan5 Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 In fact I think I'm quite glad they didn't just blindly pay it out Indeed. How quickly people go from 'why have we overspent, how disgraceful the debt is' to 'why aren't we just paying it'..... No longer are we a club who can just chuck away a hundred thousand. Whether the money is there or not, that is huge money for us now, that could and should be another player next season. Not just one for a handful of meaningless games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Indeed. How quickly people go from 'why have we overspent, how disgraceful the debt is' to 'why aren't we just paying it'..... No longer are we a club who can just chuck away a hundred thousand. Whether the money is there or not, that is huge money for us now, that could and should be another player next season. Not just one for a handful of meaningless games. We're paying him circa 100 grand a month, that'll be just for him to sit at home until his contract is up end of next season unless we pay it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveTheRave Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 We're paying him circa 100 grand a month, that'll be just for him to sit at home until his contract is up end of next season unless we pay it. He'll be able to play 22 league games next season before we have to pay Liverpool £100,000. Unless my ITK unreliable source is wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwfcfan5 Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 We're paying him circa 100 grand a month, that'll be just for him to sit at home until his contract is up end of next season unless we pay it. Right. But that can't be changed now and can't happen again in the future. Clearly they need to try and move him in the summer. If not then perhaps find the money to pay Liverpool. But throwing away 100 grand for nothing doesn't seem too clever to me. Next season a wage of 2 grand per week will probably be a squad player at least. We are going to have to get frugal. 100 thousand is a LOT of money to us now. And has to be used wisely not thrown away casually. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Right. But that can't be changed now and can't happen again in the future. Clearly they need to try and move him in the summer. If not then perhaps find the money to pay Liverpool. But throwing away 100 grand for nothing doesn't seem too clever to me. Next season a wage of 2 grand per week will probably be a squad player at least. We are going to have to get frugal. 100 thousand is a LOT of money to us now. And has to be used wisely not thrown away casually. If our average wage is going to 2k per week we'd better get prepared for another relegation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Carlos Posted March 13, 2016 Moderators Share Posted March 13, 2016 How much do you think Burton Albion are paying their squad? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GudniB Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Give it a rest mate, you have no idea what you are talking about. (that's amied Gudni not Hunt). I'm going to respect the wishes of most members and leave this well alone now. Very wise. If I needed advice on financial accounting (which I don't) I would look to someone with real expertise (e.g. an FCA) not a cost and management wallah, let alone an accounting technician. The more important issue is whether if you were looking for someone to be CEO of Burnden Leisure or chair its board you might do well to appoint people with more reliable backgrounds than Dean Christopher Holdsworth or Ken Anderson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 How much do you think Burton Albion are paying their squad? Honestly I've no idea but I'd suspect more than 2k per week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadRunnerFan Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Very wise. If I needed advice on financial accounting (which I don't) I would look to someone with real expertise (e.g. an FCA) not a cost and management wallah, let alone an accounting technician. The more important issue is whether if you were looking for someone to be CEO of Burnden Leisure or chair its board you might do well to appoint people with more reliable backgrounds than Dean Christopher Holdsworth or Ken Anderson. Well done mate you've well and truly outed yourself as a WUM. I was playing a patient game, only a matter of time. Don't you realise that ACMA overrides MAAT? AAT is a stepping stone. Eddie Davies is an ACMA, Phil Gartside an FCA. One no better than the other. ACMA tends to be more commercial, ACA more audit based, but google wont tell you that, working in finance will. Hope you had a nice day researching, I went out for a few scoops. Stick your tin foil hat where the sun don't shine you financially illiterate weapon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Accountancy bore-off Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.