Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Politics


miamiwhite

Recommended Posts

  • Site Supporter
Just now, royal white said:

Why would they be processed? If they have not come over using the safe and legal route it’s obvious they have no right being here. 

THERE IS NO SAFE AND LEGAL ROUTE. Jesus fucking Christ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
1 minute ago, royal white said:

Why would they be processed? If they have not come over using the safe and legal route it’s obvious they have no right being here. 

There isnt a safe and legal route for the vast majority

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Farrelli said:

A fully rounded policy is required so that the numbers crossing in boats will significantly drop.

1. Seriously tackle the trafficking gangs. Break up their network and bring them to justice. Coordinated approach is necessary with Germany, France and others.


2. Process asylum seekers quickly so we can then deal with accommodating the legal ones and utilise their skills more effectively to help our economy.

If we did these two things  it would be far more efficient and cost effective than the Rwanda policy and there would be some genuine positive impacts.

1) fully agree with breaking up these gangs however it’s a problem across Europe, I don’t think it’s just a case of us having talks with other countries as it seems apparent across the board. 
 

2) let’s say 1k legal ones get processed a week. Where are we accommodating them? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, royal white said:

So should we just let them come over or use  some kind of deterrent?

Is the idea of a deterrent not that it works? 

I know you'll find it difficult, as its not in your nature, but do you think. Yes or No. That the Rwanda idea is a something that will deter those who want to cross, from crossing. 

I know you think that as soon as a single person is deported to Rwanda, that all cross channel traffic will stop, I'm not as convinced though to be honest. 

Edited by Sweep
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
Just now, Sweep said:

It's the idea of a deterrent not that it works? 

I know you'll find it difficult, as its not in your nature, but do you think. Yes or No. That the Rwanda idea is a something that will deter those who want to cross, from crossing. 

I know you think that as soon as a single person is deported to Rwanda, that all cross channel traffic will stop, I'm not as convinced though to be honest. 

They would get to Rwanda and set off back here!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sweep said:

It's the idea of a deterrent not that it works? 

I know you'll find it difficult, as its not in your nature, but do you think. Yes or No. That the Rwanda idea is a something that will deter those who want to cross, from crossing. 

I know you think that as soon as a single person is deported to Rwanda, that all cross channel traffic will stop, I'm not as convinced though to be honest

Where have I said that. To stop illegal acts, you need some kind of deterrent, surely you can agree with that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
11 minutes ago, royal white said:

Why would they be processed? If they have not come over using the safe and legal route it’s obvious they have no right being here. 

How is it obvious?

Legally, you are correct

Morally, ethically, youre talking shite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
Just now, royal white said:

So why would anyone who could come over using the safe and legal route pay 5k to come over on a dinghy? 

Because there isnt a safe and legal route, you clown

Watch the video

Reet, youre either thick as fuck or taking the piss

See if cheese will play, but iamoot

:)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, royal white said:

Where have I said that. To stop illegal acts, you need some kind of deterrent, surely you can agree with that? 

I agree, we probably do need a deterrent, but it ought to be legal and manageable, the Rwanda deal doesn't seem to be either. It'll never happen, and even if it does, it's probably not a big enough deterrent. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter
7 minutes ago, Casino said:

Because there isnt a safe and legal route, you clown

Watch the video

Reet, youre either thick as fuck or taking the piss

See if cheese will play, but iamoot

:)

I'll pass too. He's thick as fuck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
5 minutes ago, royal white said:

Fkinell another M0ng. It helps if you know what’s being discussed “if safe and legal routes do come in”

 

It’s not hard is it. 

 

IMG_4669.thumb.jpeg.39ea38febbaf0dbe8f2761e7c30cebd0.jpeg

Ok, one last point

 

Atm, there are no safe and legal routes

So, deserving folk have to come 'illegally'

There will be no safe and legal routes until the backlog is dealt with...bravermans words

So, wtf do you expect a desperate person to do...they can only travel illegally

 

If there were safe and legal routes, id expect legals to use them

Illegals will try it on on a salr or continue on the illegal route

Roo fucking wanda wont stop the chancers trying it on

 

Do you know the percentage of asylum seekers in the system who get refused?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Casino said:

Ok, one last point

 

Atm, there are no safe and legal routes

So, deserving folk have to come 'illegally'

There will be no safe and legal routes until the backlog is dealt with...bravermans words

So, wtf do you expect a desperate person to do...they can only travel illegally

 

If there were safe and legal routes, id expect legals to use them

Illegals will try it on on a salr or continue on the illegal route

Roo fucking wanda wont stop the chancers trying it on

 

Do you know the percentage of asylum seekers in the system who get refused?

All that and you still couldn’t answer a simple question 🤦🏻

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, royal white said:

If you was asked to pay 5k to go to England only to be told there’s a good chance you will end up in the middle of Africa would you pay it? 

If you was asked to pay 5k to get on a boat over the Med and then a dinghy across the Channel, with a chance you’d end up drowning, would you pay it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.