Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Politics


miamiwhite

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Casino said:

And thats why this is so fucking difficult

And its why additional benefits shouldnt be going on dark fruits and fags

Fuck the stigma of having to spend food vouchers, if thats what it takes, thats what it takes

Its about making the lives of the poor little fuckers a bit better

Much of the ire on here is aimed at the parents...the cap doesnt stop em having kids, so whats its purpose

Its clearly failing

 

Anyway, child poverty is a much bigger issue than simply removing the cap

You’re as thick as cheese… introduce a policy of unlimited kids for benefits absolutely does increase the likelihood of these types having more kids. Dumb as fuck. I give up. Crack on you weapons. 

Edited by Mounts Kipper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
2 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

You’re as thick as cheese… introduce a policy of unlimited kids for benefits absolutely does increase the likelihood of these types having more kids. Dumb as fuck. I give up. Crack on you weapons. 

There is currently a policy of limiting to 2 kids

Spongers have more than 2 kids, so it clearly doesnt work to stop baby machines

It just punishes kids

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Casino said:

There is currently a policy of limiting to 2 kids

Spongers have more than 2 kids, so it clearly doesnt work to stop baby machines

It just punishes kids

 

You’re beyond help… 2 plus kids for benefit will Increase the numbers & the size of the benefit bill. & the extra benefit will go on beer and baccie. Think you’re on a wind up. 

Edited by Mounts Kipper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Sweep said:

Where do the residents go when it does get closed down? 

I know this is crazy but they are cancelling the deal to use the barge at the end of its contract.

The reason they are cancelling it ? They are going to process the people on the barge. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jol_BWFC said:

Repurposing Rwanda funds to actually get people out of the country too, it seems. 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cpe388jy2n3o

“It will be the first time a flight has returned failed asylum seekers to the country since 2021”

Fck me, the Tories were an absolute joke with asylum policy. Doing absolutely nothing other than opening barges & more hotels whilst the backlog increases. 

Good to see Labour processing & sending folk back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, royal white said:

Let’s hope those lefty, unwashed, green hair types don’t try to prevent these people being returned. If they don’t then you’d have to ask why. 

Careful, there's a mob of them on here!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
10 hours ago, royal white said:

I Would love to know how that Roma gypsy community in Leeds are contributing 

Now come on. Peg production, lavender sales, security awareness lessons, advanced theft techniques.

You have to give credit where it's due.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
8 hours ago, PatrickBateman said:

'14 years of rabid and extremist'

Fcking hell, you're either the greatest troll on ww or a complete mongalong 😅😅

The Tories allowed an asylum-invasion, taxes through the roof and gave free money to people on Universal Credit and that's right-wing??

Again, we have one party, Starmer is Rishi minus the tan, they're the same thing ffs.

The man gets it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
8 hours ago, PatrickBateman said:

Well they're called the Conservative party, the clue is in the name really.

I don't think leaving the borders wide-open helped working folk here, do you? If I go to my local doctors then it's wall-to-wall unemployed Somalians, they're contributing fck all.

 

Yep. High taxation, big government, inability (or unwillingness) to get a grip on immigration (legal or illegal). These are a million miles away from conservatism.

Been saying for a while that there's a cigarette paper between the last Conservative government and their main opponent. Watching for growth in the Reform infrastructure now. The only hope unless the Tories return to where they should be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
8 hours ago, PatrickBateman said:

I'm far-right 😅

Good one, comrade

We all are according to the cabal on here. It's the scare label they trot out every time they are starting to lose the argument. A bit like the 'r' word really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
4 hours ago, Mounts Kipper said:

Good work Starmer, lads got common sense and if the SNP back a policy you know it’s utterly bananas.,

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c978m6z3egno

I didn't think they would show themselves just yet. Predicted it would be at least 6 months before the loonies let rip.

Another tick for Starmer. I am developing mild concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, royal white said:

Let’s hope those lefty, unwashed, green hair types don’t try to prevent these people being returned. If they don’t then you’d have to ask why. 

Agreed. 👍🏻 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, bwfcfan5 said:

Starmer is too weak to deal with the few cranks left in his party latest….the man is utterly ruthless.

 

 

Interesting.

This what you wrote in 2019 after Jonson kicked MP's out of the PP, when they voted against the government.

On 05/09/2019 at 08:47, bwfcfan5 said:

How can you have a party in 2019 where if you hold a different view you are immediately kicked out? That's not democracy. That's dictatorship, unsavoury and dangerous. And in any other circumstances you'd totally agree. This is dangerous and you know it - you just won't admit to it. 

So, ruthless, or a ditatorship ?

Or (and I feel this is the case here) does it differ if its 'your' side doing it, rather than 'them' ?

Edited by ZiggyStardust
edit to correct fat fingered typing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ZiggyStardust said:

Interesting.

This what you wrote in 2019 after Jonson kicked MP's out of the PP, when they voted against the government.

So, ruthless, or a ditatorship ?

Or (and I feel this is the case here) does it differ if its 'your' side doing it, rather than 'them' ?

It’s interesting reading comments from 2019 compared to now. There are many more. 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ZiggyStardust said:

Interesting.

This what you wrote in 2019 after Jonson kicked MP's out of the PP, when they voted against the government.

So, ruthless, or a ditatorship ?

Or (and I feel this is the case here) does it differ if its 'your' side doing it, rather than 'them' ?

I'm genuinely thinking he's a world-class troll, posted before the election crying about those dreaded right-wingers. 

I was half expecting him to announce his new name as Danielle afterwards with pronouns zee/zurr.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.