Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Politics

What is that "mate" of mine Sadiq Khan trying to achieve ?

 

You lost you demented little cretin, get over it and concentrate on your job you terrorist sympathiser.

This is part 1 of the Politics discussion.
  • Replies 102.9k
  • Views 5m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Topics in this Discussion

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • TM Trotter
    TM Trotter

    And there's me thinking that 'pensions are not a benefit' would be the most ridiculous thing I'd read today.  Never had anything given to you? Your generation were able to buy property on 3x an a

  • Pulling our current shit show of a government up for the absolute shit show they've precided over isn't depressing. Speaking and fighting for change with a proper plan and backing the people to d

  • I've been through this a million times yet you refuse to listen. I work in an area where it is happening. It's been happening a while and all of sudden it's happening an even further faster rate.

Posted Images

Featured Replies

Made me chuckle too, the mail/express etc wanted tighter border controls so what's the issue?

But that's was only our borders, we were still supposed to travel freely ( or that what some people thought )  ...

  • Author

Avoid the queues...fly to Africa, then come by ferry to Italy....no checks for them lot.........

Fought a war to avoid being under the German heel and now Bliar and his limp dicked accomplices want to meekly accept their economic domination.

 

No surrender. 

  • 3 weeks later...

Scargill's take on Brexit.The Socialist Labour Party warned that the Labour Party would betray not only it's members but betray the democratic vote by the British people to leave the European Union.

As soon as that vote was announced on the 23 June 2016 Britain should have left the EU immediately, including; the customs union; 
The single market; and above all "the free movement of labour and capital" which as seen the population in Britain rise from 59 million to 67 million. The UK should not pay a penny or Euro to the EU. If the border in Ireland is a concern the solution is a simple one return the North of Ireland back to the republic from where it was taken.
Arthur Scargill Leader "Socialist Labour Party"

Do people still care what scargill thinks? He did more damage to the minors then Thatcher then fucked off to his mansion whilst they still pay off the debts from the strike.

Do people still care what scargill thinks? He did more damage to the minors then Thatcher then fucked off to his mansion whilst they still pay off the debts from the strike.

He just warned us of the decimation of the mining industry in 84, all in all, he was telling the truth.

He's a cnut with a shocking comb over

If the border in Ireland is a concern the solution is a simple one return the North of Ireland back to the republic from where it was taken.[/font][/color]

Arthur Scargill Leader "Socialist Labour Party"

What a dick

 

As said above by Ghana, does anybody really care what Scargill says these days? Apart from the "woe is me" ex-miners who are still bleating on about how hard done by they were 30+ years ago, it really is time they moved on, once they do then Scargill will lose any sort of platform he has.

Do people still care what scargill thinks? He did more damage to the minors then Thatcher then fucked off to his mansion whilst they still pay off the debts from the strike.

Paedophile?

  • 2 weeks later...

So all those laws everybody wanted rid of are coming over to British law lock stock and barrel anyway??

 

It would be hilarious if wasn't so tragic.

 

What a waste of everybody's time this all really is.

Then they can bee looked at and smended/repealed as necessary.

 

If we looked at each one individually before transfer most of us would be dead before the process was concluded.

Then they can bee looked at and smended/repealed as necessary.

 

 

Name one :)

Its a legal and economic necessity though. Allows the wheels to keep turning.

 

Ministers can then alter them accordingly. Apparently.

Name one :)

 

Fishing

 

We can sink French and Spanish ships that try and catch our cods and pollocks.

 

But, we're allowed to send our brave heroes in wooly hats into the Bay of Biscay and there's nothing Pierre or Esteban can do about it.

 

Next.

So we now have control of our laws.

 

Except now Ministers can make changes without going back through parliament.

 

So 'us' getting control actually means Ministers and we have reduced power of our elected parliament.

 

But no need to worry they won't abuse the power.

So all those laws everybody wanted rid of 

.

 

remind me again, which are the laws in particular that people don't want?

So all those laws everybody wanted rid of are coming over to British law lock stock and barrel anyway??

 

It would be hilarious if wasn't so tragic.

 

What a waste of everybody's time this all really is.

 

That was always going to be the case.

Name one :)

 

The one which equalises annuity rates for males and females, even though all data collected over more than a century indicates that, on average, females live longer than males and will continue to do so for another century.

remind me again, which are the laws in particular that people don't want?

 

It's actually not the laws, rather the judges who interpret them. Some of these would meet the standard for judicial appointments in  the UK and some would not. Some are political appointees, so no wonder their judgements are sometimes conveniently perverse.

So we now have control of our laws.

Except now Ministers can make changes without going back through parliament.

So 'us' getting control actually means Ministers and we have reduced power of our elected parliament.

But no need to worry they won't abuse the power.

Not sure its quite as simple as that. All this is way over my swede, but a chap on the box a few weeks ago explained it as being a necessary 'temporary' measure whilst the unique situation is addressed.

From what he was saying, I got the impression that once we'd left parliament would then be able to revisit stuff as necessary.

It just needed doing quickly with ministers making initial alterations as necessary to prepare for the leaving date.

That said its a minefield, and if it was shown that an abuse of power was indeed going on, then a weakish government may well be fucked

Chat as much shit as you want

 

This is a good old fashioned negotiation with one party wanting an amount of money, and the other party determined to give away as little as possible.

 

Like everything, it boils down to money and sex.

 

Which means one of the parties will end up fucked and skint.

 

Over to you, Mr Davies.

remind me again, which are the laws in particular that people don't want?

curvy bananas back
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.