gonzo Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 No one said it was acceptable nob head. We're talking about chatting folk up etc. Not such shit as that. Get a fucking grip. Blokes have been advancing on women since time began. If they didn't the human race would cease to exist. It's popular misconception that woman don't want attention. As for wolf whistling, only fat mingers that have never heard one moan about it. It's also not 1989, giving someone a like on face fuck or tinder is the same as a wolf whistle. Vanity will always win. Shove your liberal shite up your arse. (The upskirt stuff was a joke by the way and only have happens to daily sport models getting out of taxis or them mad japs that fuck each other with sea monsters) Quote
Guest Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 Fuck me - we have found the mainstay of WWays version of the Righteous Brothers. Fuck knows how you would have handled the stuff on here before 2011. You'd have been apoplectic son. The comment that 'upskirting' is disgusting ('hate crime' FFS!) makes me wonder if you weren't the oddball who couldn't bring himself to partake in a little cunnilingus but expected to receive the female to male equivalent from your partner? Maybe you are one of them male to male types? What next? Thinking noncing is wrong makes you righteous? Look, I dread to ask this. But I’m intrigued enough to risk it. What defence do you have for someone putting their phone under a woman or young girls skirt and taking a photo? Quote
gonzo Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 What next? Thinking noncing is wrong makes you righteous? Look, I dread to ask this. But I’m intrigued enough to risk it. What defence do you have for someone putting their phone under a woman or young girls skirt and taking a photo? What on earth are you papping on about? Quote
Guest Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 The actions of a professional liberal Illiberal, surely? (Could have been irony) Quote
gonzo Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 Illiberal, surely? (Could have been irony) I'm no good at ironing Quote
Not in Crawley Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 No one said it was acceptable nob head. We're talking about chatting folk up etc. Not such shit as that. Get a fucking grip. You do get very angry, very quickly. Stop. Breathe. Think. Quote
Zico Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 If anyone has to put up with any form of advance that isn’t consensual, it’s wrong. See, it’s not that difficult is it? trying telling Louis CK that Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 You do get very angry, very quickly. Stop. Breathe. Think. In my last job I learned to suffer fools. I have since regressed. Quote
madthatter Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 Blokes have been clubbing women since time began. If they didn't the human race would cease to exist. It's popular misconception that woman don't want attention. As for wolf whistling, only fat mingers that have never heard one moan about it. It's also not 1989, giving someone a like on face fuck or tinder is the same as a wolf whistle. Vanity will always win. Shove your liberal shite up your arse. (The upskirt stuff was a joke by the way and only have happens to daily sport models getting out of taxis or them mad japs that fuck each other with sea monsters) Great point! I took it upon myself to edit the first bit. Quote
madthatter Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 I'll say this about upskirting. It's wrong, no question but . . . you're still gonna have a look at the snap, aren't you? Not that different from leaked pics like those Jennifer Lawrence ones. Be honest now Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 Hmm. I'd much prefer a pretty face and a magnificent pair of norks in a well framed picture than a blurred picture of an unknown growler. Quote
madthatter Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 Hmm. I'd much prefer a pretty face and a magnificent pair of norks in a well framed picture than a blurred picture of an unknown growler. That's a bit picky Seriously though, an upskirt of Rihanna or whoever gets on the net, would you take a peak? Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 That's a bit picky Seriously though, an upskirt of Rihanna or whoever gets on the net, would you take a peak? In all honesty not by choice. If some one thrust a mobile at me and said look at that then maybe. If a picture of Marion Cottillard or other luscious lady with her wapps out was available then absolutely. Quote
bolty58 Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 (edited) What next? Thinking noncing is wrong makes you righteous? Look, I dread to ask this. But I’m intrigued enough to risk it. What defence do you have for someone putting their phone under a woman or young girls skirt and taking a photo? None at all. I was referring to enjoying a little glimpse up an attractive woman's skirt. Don't tell me that you don't enjoy such. Weirdo's taking photo's and having mirrors on their shoes etc. could be castrated for all I care. Nice to know I inspire dread though. FFS, google 'drama queen'. Edited March 9, 2018 by bolty58 Quote
Guest Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 None at all. I was referring to enjoying a little glimpse up an attractive woman's skirt. Don't tell me that you don't enjoy such. Weirdo's taking photo's and having mirrors on their shoes etc. could be castrated for all I care. Nice to know I inspire dread though. FFS, google 'drama queen'. Upskirting is the act of taking an unsolicited photo. That is what was being referred to as something that should be a crime. Not a cheeky glance or whatever. Quote
gonzo Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 Upskirting is the act of taking an unsolicited photo. That is what was being referred to as something that should be a crime. Not a cheeky glance or whatever. Nobody referred to it other than in jest you massvie fanny. Quote
bolty58 Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 Upskirting is the act of taking an unsolicited photo. That is what was being referred to as something that should be a crime. Not a cheeky glance or whatever. Let's be specific now. You said 'hate crime'. I would like to get every dollar I had on a even money bet that the perpetrators of such dastardly acts have anything but 'hate' in their minds/hearts/groins at the time. I suspect they do, in fact, 'love' what they are photographing (the grubby little irks). Quote
Guest Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 Let's be specific now. You said 'hate crime'. I would like to get every dollar I had on a even money bet that the perpetrators of such dastardly acts have anything but 'hate' in their minds/hearts/groins at the time. I suspect they do, in fact, 'love' what they are photographing (the grubby little irks). Hate crime is one motivated by racial, sexual, or other prejudice. The article from the MP called for these things to be "hate crimes". I pretty much disagreed with everything she listed except for upskirting. I'd have no issue if that were labelled a hate crime myself. Quote
Spider Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 Birds are always checking my junk out I reckon. They're just really sly so I never notice. I'd say that entitles me to have a surreptitious glance at their busters and/or cuntlump by return. Equality in action Quote
Casino Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 It's voyeurism surely not in the eyes of the law so, no crime Quote
kent_white Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 I'd say that entitles me to have a surreptitious glance at their.....cuntlump by return. The correct anatomical terminology you are looking for is 'fanny bulge' Quote
athywhite1958 Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 Word of the day has to be 'cuntbump' WW at it's best Quote
madthatter Posted March 9, 2018 Posted March 9, 2018 The correct anatomical terminology you are looking for is 'fanny bulge' aka Beetle bonnet Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.