Meanwhile in Israel

[Not in Crawley]

2 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

Eh? I was commenting on LAR post about people glorifying the ‘martyrs’ who killed 1400 innocent people. I never mentioned anyone on here. I’ll put you in the ignorant bracket. Fool.

I pity the fool!

Yes, super ignorant me.

Your comment, and your previous posts, speak volumes.

[BobyBrno]

Just now, Not in Crawley said:

I pity the fool!

Yes, super ignorant me.

Your comment, and your previous posts, speak volumes.

Ok. 

[wanderer1984]

6 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

Eh? I was commenting on LAR post about people glorifying the ‘martyrs’ who killed 1400 innocent people. I never mentioned anyone on here. I’ll put you in the ignorant bracket. Fool.

They've lost the polt on this one 😊

[Not in Crawley]

3 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

Ok. 

😘 off for a meal at the Groucho. 

Been a looooong day.

[Not in Crawley]

3 minutes ago, wanderer1984 said:

They've lost the polt on this one 😊

Totally. The Blob will never win.

[London Wanderer]

51 minutes ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

That it's yet another chant many people are revelling in - while being entirely dismissive to the discomfort and fear of another ethnic minority - because it offers just enough plausible deniability over their malicious intent

Chants like "From the River to the Sea", "Intifada, Revolution" and public calls for Jihad might often be used innocently (the calls for Jihad from Hitzb-ut-Tahrir clearly weren't, no matter what the Met's "hate crime experts" advise), or perhaps more likely naively - we'd disagree on the size of the malign minority and that minority's influence on the sentiment of the protests - but if I were using them and were conscious of how terrified Jewish people in the UK were of the atmosphere being created, I'd be at pains to either find another way to express my thoughts or at the very least do as much of the heavy lifting as I possibly could when it came to policing my own movement

Far too many are indifferent at best

I can see your point here👍

But you can also flip some of your points and say why are Jews not doing more to prevent Israel’s horrific eviction policies in Jerusalem and the West Bank?

I don’t think you can expect Pro Palestinian protesters to police their own movement, it’s too broad a church of people. These things aren’t political parties with a code of conduct & staff/resources etc. It’s far more fluid than that and it’s ignorant to put them all in the same box.

Anyone can video one word from a chant with no attempt to contextualise it. Or interview someone waffling shite and assume everyone on the demo thinks the same. But that doesn’t give a clear picture. Often when you go you to these pages, then you see their videos are all trying to paint the same picture and there’s no balance. It’s madness that this has become many peoples way of shaping their world views.

[London Wanderer]

1 hour ago, wanderer1984 said:

Sidetracked is your speciality 😂

Me ... I said it 🙄

Never said I had experts to rely on like yourself then backtrack 😂

2195 now apparently 

a percent a year did you say!?😂

Bit less scared now I hope ❤️ 

Edited November 9, 2023 by London Wanderer

[London Wanderer]

1 hour ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/PRR-12-2018-0034/full/html#:~:text=Among the High-Growth Muslim,2195) (Table I).

2195 apparently!

Finally a link! Rather than ignorant drivel based on an irrational paranoia of anyone different. 
 

An interesting read. Their 5 step methodology for forecasting was a surprise. So many variables too. If current climate change trends are anything to go by, then there’s no way we’ll be seeing growth on that scale from 2100. 
 

Reports and polls also show (despite the fear mongering) that Muslim support for liberal values is growing with each generation. Eg, homosexuality being legal.

 

 

[wanderer1984]

5 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

Finally a link! Rather than ignorant drivel based on an irrational paranoia of anyone different. 
 

An interesting read. Their 5 step methodology for forecasting was a surprise. So many variables too. If current climate change trends are anything to go by, then there’s no way we’ll be seeing growth on that scale from 2100. 
 

Reports and polls also show (despite the fear mongering) that Muslim support for liberal values is growing with each generation. Eg, homosexuality being legal.

 

 

Finally! 😂  

Turns out the only drivel is your 10% conclusion.

It was an opinion, something you really dare do without your fact checks which you backtrack on 😂

[London Wanderer]

3 minutes ago, wanderer1984 said:

Finally! 😂  

Turns out the only drivel is your 10% conclusion.

It was an opinion, something you really dare do without your fact checks which you backtrack on 😂

Not backtracking on anything mate

I fully believe that in 50 years we will not be a majority Muslim country like you said 👍 That’s as close to a future fact as you’ll ever get.

My opinion is we won’t even be close.

And even if your ‘worst case apocalyptic scenario’ came true, I couldn’t really care less. If I’m lucky to hit 80 or 90 then I’d be quite happy with less Gammons and more Muslims about the place ☪️

[royal white]

8 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

Not backtracking on anything mate

I fully believe that in 50 years we will not be a majority Muslim country like you said 👍 That’s as close to a future fact as you’ll ever get.

My opinion is we won’t even be close.

And even if your ‘worst case apocalyptic scenario’ came true, I couldn’t really care less. If I’m lucky to hit 80 or 90 then I’d be quite happy with less Gammons and more Muslims about the place ☪️

Do you also believe the fact-check about the 10% that you posted? 

[London Wanderer]

4 minutes ago, royal white said:

Do you also believe the fact-check about the 10% that you posted? 

 “Shit. I don’t have a fckn clue about council funding. So let’s go back to what you guys said about the NF & a population trend forecast”

😂

You are the whataboutery master 🙂

Edited November 10, 2023 by London Wanderer

[royal white]

3 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

 “Shit. I don’t have a fckn clue about council funding. So let’s go back to what you guys said about the NF & a population trend forecast”

😂

You are the whataboutery master 🙂

It’s a reply to your post about percentages. I’ve also replied to your other post about councils. I’m guessing you’ve made another fool of yourself with the 10% post haven’t you. Or do you agree with it? 

[London Wanderer]

2 minutes ago, royal white said:

It’s a reply to your post about percentages. I’ve also replied to your other post about councils. I’m guessing you’ve made another fool of yourself with the 10% post haven’t you. Or do you agree with it? 

Nice try.

 You couldn’t get over here quick enough.

“but, but, whatabout your 10% post” 😂😂
 

Best get my sleep now, we need all the strength we can get for the ever growing Muslim invasion. 
 

Enjoy your riveting night shift & council funds reading. Let me know when you get to the bit on who sets the National criteria for free school transport. You can fill me in tomorrow👍

 hope you don’t mind the double threader x

[royal white]

1 minute ago, London Wanderer said:

Nice try.

 You couldn’t get over here quick enough.

“but, but, whatabout your 10% post” 😂😂
 

Best get my sleep now, we need all the strength we can get for the ever growing Muslim invasion. 
 

Enjoy your riveting night shift & council funds reading. Let me know when you get to the bit on who sets the National criteria for free school transport. You can fill me in tomorrow👍

 hope you don’t mind the double threader x

It was after the council post, you need to keep up. Just admit it you’ve outdone yourself yet again. Using fact check as your “proof” which is looking nothing of the sort. No wonder the kids are struggling, instead of marking books sir is on here posting shite 🥴

 

Na night sir. 
 

 

[bolty58]

On 08/11/2023 at 16:03, Sweep said:

Let's be clear, she knows exactly what she's doing. 

She knows that the Conservative Party is toast at the next GE, so I suspect that she wants to be sacked from her current role, so that she can, as best as possible, distance herself from the landslide defeat. 

She'll then make a play for the leadership, once Sunak has been sacked. She'll then promise to take them further "right", which the membership will lap up 

Here you show that you are not a numb fucker. There is much in this post I believe to be correct.

[bolty58]

On 08/11/2023 at 20:53, Casino said:

i dunno if its supposed to be a joke

lets assume its not

ive been very careful to note the distinction between israel and jews

not all israelis are jews for a start

mounts has his usual anti moslem rant, reckons israel can do no wrong when its clear as day the israeli govt are a set of cunts who are a law unto themselves and act without any concern for international law/UN resolutions

 

Well, well. Others have been castigated for this.

[bolty58]

On 09/11/2023 at 02:17, BobyBrno said:

Nothing like a good workout after a tough day on Wanderersways. I used to do the same when I worked. 👍

I see he's on the ageist trail again. These fucking chardonnay socialist wankers are the biggest fucking hypocrites around.

[wanderer1984]

6 hours ago, royal white said:

It was after the council post, you need to keep up. Just admit it you’ve outdone yourself yet again. Using fact check as your “proof” which is looking nothing of the sort. No wonder the kids are struggling, instead of marking books sir is on here posting shite 🥴

 

Na night sir. 
 

 

😂

[Not in Crawley]

5 hours ago, bolty58 said:

I see he's on the ageist trail again. These fucking chardonnay socialist wankers are the biggest fucking hypocrites around.

😁 oops we've woken up the kraken.

[London Wanderer]

8 hours ago, royal white said:

It was after the council post, you need to keep up. Just admit it you’ve outdone yourself yet again. Using fact check as your “proof” which is looking nothing of the sort. No wonder the kids are struggling, instead of marking books sir is on here posting shite 🥴

 

Na night sir. 
 

 

Haha

‘ I don’t know anything about the councils and I’m well out my depth, so I’ll say something about taxis then head to another thread and tell people how stupid they are on there” 😂

But but but, 10% 10% 10%
 

can you do it a fourth I wonder?

 You made our resident Muslim basher laugh though so I’ll give you that one

[Lt. Aldo Raine]

9 hours ago, London Wanderer said:

I can see your point here👍

But you can also flip some of your points and say why are Jews not doing more to prevent Israel’s horrific eviction policies in Jerusalem and the West Bank?

I don’t think you can expect Pro Palestinian protesters to police their own movement, it’s too broad a church of people. These things aren’t political parties with a code of conduct & staff/resources etc. It’s far more fluid than that and it’s ignorant to put them all in the same box.

Anyone can video one word from a chant with no attempt to contextualise it. Or interview someone waffling shite and assume everyone on the demo thinks the same. But that doesn’t give a clear picture. Often when you go you to these pages, then you see their videos are all trying to paint the same picture and there’s no balance. It’s madness that this has become many peoples way of shaping their world views.

Well, no you couldn't

People attending a pro-Palestinian march by definition become an activist and therefore assume a responsibility (however small) in a way Jews (or Palestinians) simply going about their lives in the UK don't

Pro-Palestinian marchers might prove unable to police their own movement but there should be an expectation to at least make an effort and too many, whether through outright malice, indifference, or ignorance, simply don't

For example, one of the organisers of Saturday's march is the Palestine Solidarity Campaign and on 7th October the PSC praised "the resistance" and organised a march for the following Monday whilst the terrorist atrocities were still taking place and yet there's no pushback

The problem with contextualising is it's possible to end up contextualising out reality - the blunt fact is a significant proportion really do mean it

[Tonge moor green jacket]

 

Cat and pigeons.

[Tonge moor green jacket]

11 hours ago, Sweep said:

Too far in the future to be even remotely arsed about it

Too far to be accurate too I reckon.

Anyway, the assertion over SB- certainly distancing herself from police etc, though I'm not convinced it's purely a leadership bid as she's annoying folk on her own side too.

I see it as a deliberate effort to increasingly separate themselves from labour in the approaching election; during which the opposition, police, lawyers will be lumped together and targeted in electioneering. 

Of course if it doesn't work; SKS gets in, and Rishi is ousted she may then feel emboldened to stand. Not sure she'd get the gig though, as per last time.

 

[Mounts Kipper]

16 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Too far to be accurate too I reckon.

Anyway, the assertion over SB- certainly distancing herself from police etc, though I'm not convinced it's purely a leadership bid as she's annoying folk on her own side too.

I see it as a deliberate effort to increasingly separate themselves from labour in the approaching election; during which the opposition, police, lawyers will be lumped together and targeted in electioneering. 

Of course if it doesn't work; SKS gets in, and Rishi is ousted she may then feel emboldened to stand. Not sure she'd get the gig though, as per last time.

 

There is no IF about Labour being in power after the next election.