Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Meanwhile in Israel


wanderer1984

Recommended Posts

  • Site Supporter
2 minutes ago, bolty58 said:

An understatement. A left wing organisation towing the party line. Plain and simple. Jeremy will be proud of them.

To be honest mate, I've heard bigger lefties than them call Hamas what they are.

BBC are simply out on a limb and out of touch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

Yeah. Seen that, many times . He’s wrong and they are wrong. Don’t you agree?

I think it’s interesting when you hear their reasoning. I don’t think they’re doing it to condone Hamas, nor do I think it does by not calling them out for who they are. Their reporting has been fairly accurate and they’ve shown everyone the kind of animals Hamas are. It’s not like they are only applying this to Hamas. 

The BBC were targeted by Pro - Palestinian protesters and they’re attacked by the pro-Israel camp for this. I think that says a lot. 
 

Ultimately though, I do disagree, they should label them for who they are. Especially now. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Spider said:

Hamas is a cancer.

Treating cancer often means destroying cancerous cells but also means destroying healthy ones in the process.

Sad but true.

The Palestinian people have the option to distance themselves from Hamas both physically and idealogically , but they don't. Therefore they are knowingly putting themselves and their families in the line of fire.

Fact is that support for Hamas is strong. That support carries risk.

They have the option to get out of the way, or better still, stop supporting an organisation that is willing to use them as human shields.

 

That clearly isn’t the case. As we saw yesterday.

3000 dead now. How many more before the “cancer” is cured? 5000, 10,000. Is there a cut off number or are you happy for that number to go up and up until Hamas are gone? 
 

It’s their fault anyway because they didn’t leave, so fuck them. You’d think a five year old would have more sense than to stay put. 
 

We invaded Afghanistan after 9/11. Did that make the Taliban disappear? 
 

This won’t create peace, or reduce support for Hamas. Nor will it make them go away. I hope I’m wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter
3 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

That clearly isn’t the case. As we saw yesterday.

3000 dead now. How many more before the “cancer” is cured? 5000, 10,000. Is there a cut off number or are you happy for that number to go up and up until Hamas are gone? 
 

It’s their fault anyway because they didn’t leave, so fuck them. You’d think a five year old would have more sense than to stay put. 
 

We invaded Afghanistan after 9/11. Did that make the Taliban disappear? 
 

This won’t create peace, or reduce support for Hamas. Nor will it make them go away. I hope I’m wrong.

My honest opinion is that we leave the silly fuckers to it.

Bit as we’re debating this on the off chance it may affect us directly, I’m very much not in favour of bending to a lame agenda.

These people clearly cannot be reasoned with.

God said so, or some such shite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Spider said:

Hamas is a cancer.

Treating cancer often means destroying cancerous cells but also means destroying healthy ones in the process.

Sad but true.

The Palestinian people have the option to distance themselves from Hamas both physically and idealogically , but they don't. Therefore they are knowingly putting themselves and their families in the line of fire.

Fact is that support for Hamas is strong. That support carries risk.

They have the option to get out of the way, or better still, stop supporting an organisation that is willing to use them as human shields.

 

They are currently creating more support for hamas than they are destroying. It is not a good plan for a country to behave like terrorists whatever the provocation. See Russia as a case in point. Any action has to be targeted and proportionate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
16 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

That explains why the BBC refuse to call Hamas as a terrorist organisation but not why they won't refer (in the first person) to the attack itself as a terrorist attack

Previous terrorist attacks have been referred to as such, and so was last night's 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

As for the BBC, the Balen Report.
One of the things about being an elder (Mature Adult) is that we remember things that younger folk don’t. 
It’s still not been released. It puts a completely different complexion on things. 
https://www.standard.co.uk/hp/front/the-secret-report-at-heart-of-bbc-s-gaza-paranoia-6870301.html

You need to move on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
1 hour ago, BobyBrno said:

Seen it quoted many times that Israel have the right to reply with ‘proportionate’ force. I haven’t seen anyone, anywhere say what proportionate means. I’ve also seen reports that they have been indiscriminate in their bombing. Who can tell what is indiscriminate and what is targeted. No one, certainly no one on. Wanderersways. 

What do you make of this 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-middle-east-67119233H

Hundreds of people have been killed in an Israeli strike on a hospital in Gaza, according to Palestinian officials

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
1 hour ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

 

What are the UN etc, doing to stop Hamas etc?

What us Israel supposed to do?

 

Stop killing innocents?

95 per cent of those killed this year had been palestinians

As for the UN, theyre too busy being ignored by Israel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
11 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

Not sure why you’ve asked me. Is there a reason?

It was in response to your post

Do you think that is proportionate or indiscriminate to what has happened so far 

In your opinion  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

The huge irony laid bare.

Terrorists aren't held to the same standards: war crimes etc, but those they seek to wipe from existence are expected to.

The very thing that terror groups try to use for their own means.

Folk complain when Gaza gets bombed. Folk complain when supplies are restricted. Folk complain when Israel tells people to move away, so they can tackle to terrorists.

Everything breaks some rule or other.

What are the UN etc, doing to stop Hamas etc?

What us Israel supposed to do?

 

The UN can do fuck all. Its a toothless organisation. Even more so in the middle east.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Zico said:

It was in response to your post

Do you think that is proportionate or indiscriminate to what has happened so far 

In your opinion  

Other people talked about proportionate responses. I just asked what that was. You could have asked others but never mind. If it’s as reported, I would say it’s a war crime that Israel will never recover from and will turn the world against them. What do you think? You seem more concerned about my views than giving your own. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
1 hour ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

And people wonder why they do things their own way.

Despite not following the ways of their attackers, its still their fault.

Still if our national broadcaster can't bring itself to describe Hamas as others do, then no wonder.

Isn't that down to Ofcom rules and Sky etc hadn't done either 

But the BBC is an easy target for criticism from Shapps who really knew the answer 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
6 minutes ago, DirtySanchez said:

Isn't that down to Ofcom rules and Sky etc hadn't done either 

But the BBC is an easy target for criticism from Shapps who really knew the answer 

Ofcom rules certainly wouldn't prevent the BBC from referring to the terrorist attack as a terrorist attack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
8 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

Other people talked about proportionate responses. I just asked what that was. You could have asked others but never mind. If it’s as reported, I would say it’s a war crime that Israel will never recover from and will turn the world against them. What do you think? You seem more concerned about my views than giving your own. 

I'm anti terrorism  

Hamas are scum and should be dealt with 

I don't think this approach is a good idea 

I don't need someone to tell me what is proportionate, it's quite clear this is not

I don't think it's indiscriminate, I think Israel are deliberately taking this response to the next level 

Like they wanted an excuse to flatten Palestine 

Hamas appear to have given them one 

Israel should be handling it much better than this with the west behind them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
1 hour ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

To be honest mate, I've heard bigger lefties than them call Hamas what they are.

BBC are simply out on a limb and out of touch.

Here's Sky News report of all that's gone on today 

https://news.sky.com/story/israel-hamas-war-latest-updates-gaza-sky-news-live-blog-12978800

Spot the word terrorist 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.