November 24, 20232 yr 16 hours ago, DirtySanchez said: He's probably hoping Farage would appoint Theresa May as deputy as she's the next Thatcher (unless he meant she can fix straw roofs) Dream team Being silly now. Farage and Braverman. Kick some heads.
November 24, 20232 yr 16 hours ago, Sweep said: Nah... Farage with Bravermans as deputy is the wet dream for the Gammons. Probably a high profile job for Priti Patel and JRM, for maximum moistness You'll soon be in my 'favourites' list if you carry on sweetie pie.
November 24, 20232 yr 15 hours ago, Ani said: It did strike me last night that Farage does think this is a possible outcome. He has always been linked with Trump, who is really using a political party rather than being a party member. If you look at the polls the Reform Party are taking as many Tory votes as anyone. A Tory party led by Farage would arguably have more chance of winning an election that any other given current MP. It certainly would but we all know it won't happen. Too many wet wokes in todays small 'c' socially democratic conservative Party to allow it to get through. If it were to happen, a night of the long knives would have to follow almost immediately.
November 24, 20232 yr 10 hours ago, Sweep said: Stop it, you'll give Bolty a heart attack inducing bonk on Oops! too late.
November 24, 20232 yr 2 hours ago, bolty58 said: I do hope that you are not belittling Churchill Not at all. It's you that did that by suggesting that Johnson was "Churchillian" 🙂 Unless you were referring to that daft dog on the advert
November 24, 20232 yr 1 minute ago, Sweep said: Not at all. It's you that did that by suggesting that Johnson was "Churchillian" 🙂 Unless you were referring to that daft dog on the advert Of course I was
December 7, 20232 yr He's at it again with his annoying facts. Quite something that a channel can just pump lies into folks homes and then they switch off regulated channels for not telling them what they want to hear. In other news, are those union flag Christmas decorations? Stay classy.
December 7, 20232 yr 25 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said: He's at it again with his annoying facts. Quite something that a channel can just pump lies into folks homes and then they switch off regulated channels for not telling them what they want to hear. In other news, are those union flag Christmas decorations? Stay classy. Why is it a racist lie, Why not just a lie? Edited December 7, 20232 yr by royal white
December 7, 20232 yr 25 minutes ago, royal white said: Why is it a racist lie, Why not just a lie? A lie for racists perhaps?
February 7, 20242 yr 4 hours ago, Casino said: Vile I'm having a box of Kleenex delivered to your place. FFS, what a delicate doily. You stay on the woke channels pal. That big bad world out there is too much for you gentler types.
February 7, 20242 yr 4 hours ago, bolty58 said: I'm having a box of Kleenex delivered to your place. FFS, what a delicate doily. You stay on the woke channels pal. That big bad world out there is too much for you gentler types. Do you think harry and Meghan contributed to Charles' cancer?
February 7, 20242 yr 24 minutes ago, Zico said: Do you think harry and Meghan contributed to Charles' cancer? Not sure they can contribute to anything at the moment. Coffers getting down since Joe Public cottoned on to their scheming dishonesty.
February 7, 20242 yr 1 hour ago, Zico said: Do you think harry and Meghan contributed to Charles' cancer? My initial thoughts, like everyone's is bollocks. So I had a quick look. https://www.cancercenter.com/community/blog/2019/07/what-is-the-relationship-between-stress-and-cancer#:~:text=So far%2C research has stopped,inflammation is likely to blame. So in essence, too much stress can "contribute". However, presumably the role of a senior royal is quite stressful in general, so linking one specific aspect to it is disingenuous. Parry is a bit of a bell end too.
February 7, 20242 yr 46 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: My initial thoughts, like everyone's is bollocks. So I had a quick look. https://www.cancercenter.com/community/blog/2019/07/what-is-the-relationship-between-stress-and-cancer#:~:text=So far%2C research has stopped,inflammation is likely to blame. So in essence, too much stress can "contribute". However, presumably the role of a senior royal is quite stressful in general, so linking one specific aspect to it is disingenuous. Parry is a bit of a bell end too. I think you're doing Parry a massive dis-service there. He's a full-on bellend.
February 7, 20242 yr 57 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: My initial thoughts, like everyone's is bollocks. So I had a quick look. https://www.cancercenter.com/community/blog/2019/07/what-is-the-relationship-between-stress-and-cancer#:~:text=So far%2C research has stopped,inflammation is likely to blame. So in essence, too much stress can "contribute". However, presumably the role of a senior royal is quite stressful in general, so linking one specific aspect to it is disingenuous. Parry is a bit of a bell end too. aye, the aim there is to plant seeds and get people hating harry and meghan the twat
February 7, 20242 yr 4 minutes ago, Zico said: aye, the aim there is to plant seeds and get people hating harry and meghan the twat I think they've done that themselves, and don't need any assistance. A huge swing from where they were not that long ago. Shame, but that's life I suppose. Far more concerned about the whites fitting in all these game now.
February 7, 20242 yr Author 57 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: My initial thoughts, like everyone's is bollocks. So I had a quick look. https://www.cancercenter.com/community/blog/2019/07/what-is-the-relationship-between-stress-and-cancer#:~:text=So far%2C research has stopped,inflammation is likely to blame. So in essence, too much stress can "contribute". However, presumably the role of a senior royal is quite stressful in general, so linking one specific aspect to it is disingenuous. Parry is a bit of a bell end too. This is a massive area of debate and it hasn't been settled definitively one way or another. As it stands - there is a lot of speculation, but no direct evidence that correlation implies causation. For example. You would expect people diagnosed with cancer to be suffering from higher levels of stress than people not diagnosed with cancer. You'd also expect people with a familial genetic risk of cancer (ie people who have had a close family member develop specific types of cancer) to have a higher level of stress, both because they have lived through the stress of a family member developing the condition and because of the worry that they might develop it themselves. The final point is that there are hundreds of types of cancer. The hypothesis is that some of these are more likely to have an inflammatory component to their pathophysiology than others. So it would very much depend on which type of cancer it was. And even then there would be a lot of doubt. What has been unequivocally proven by scientists in a lab is that Parry is indeed a bell end! 😁
February 7, 20242 yr 22 minutes ago, kent_white said: This is a massive area of debate and it hasn't been settled definitively one way or another. As it stands - there is a lot of speculation, but no direct evidence that correlation implies causation. For example. You would expect people diagnosed with cancer to be suffering from higher levels of stress than people not diagnosed with cancer. You'd also expect people with a familial genetic risk of cancer (ie people who have had a close family member develop specific types of cancer) to have a higher level of stress, both because they have lived through the stress of a family member developing the condition and because of the worry that they might develop it themselves. The final point is that there are hundreds of types of cancer. The hypothesis is that some of these are more likely to have an inflammatory component to their pathophysiology than others. So it would very much depend on which type of cancer it was. And even then there would be a lot of doubt. What has been unequivocally proven by scientists in a lab is that Parry is indeed a bell end! 😁 I don't think much would convince any of us that this is anything other than bollocks mate. I can't fucking stand those two lying bastards but trying to hang this on them is plain stupid IMO.
February 7, 20242 yr Author 13 minutes ago, bolty58 said: I don't think much would convince any of us that this is anything other than bollocks mate. I can't fucking stand those two lying bastards but trying to hang this on them is plain stupid IMO. Yeah I'm not a fan of them either....!
February 7, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, kent_white said: Yeah I'm not a fan of them either....! Back to the King, I'd be more inclined to be suspicious of the mung beans and 'herbal remedies'. Get some meat down yer FFS.
February 7, 20242 yr Author 1 minute ago, bolty58 said: Back to the King, I'd be more inclined to be suspicious of the mung beans and 'herbal remedies'. Get some meat down yer FFS. I saw a brilliant video of him a couple of months back. Bumping into some mountain bikers with GoPro on their helmets while he was out for a walk near Balmoral I think. Stood and chatted to them happily for a good couple of minutes without a care in the world. Always seems like a lovely bloke to me. I like the fact he's always advocated for green issues. Shown more leadership than successive prime ministers - that's for sure!
February 7, 20242 yr Author 1 minute ago, kent_white said: I saw a brilliant video of him a couple of months back. Bumping into some mountain bikers with GoPro on their helmets while he was out for a walk near Balmoral I think. Stood and chatted to them happily for a good couple of minutes without a care in the world. Always seems like a lovely bloke to me. I like the fact he's always advocated for green issues. Shown more leadership than successive prime ministers - that's for sure! https://youtu.be/q97gUrw3ib4?si=Tt1RnPsPTOwISYlZ
February 7, 20242 yr 1 hour ago, kent_white said: This is a massive area of debate and it hasn't been settled definitively one way or another. As it stands - there is a lot of speculation, but no direct evidence that correlation implies causation. For example. You would expect people diagnosed with cancer to be suffering from higher levels of stress than people not diagnosed with cancer. You'd also expect people with a familial genetic risk of cancer (ie people who have had a close family member develop specific types of cancer) to have a higher level of stress, both because they have lived through the stress of a family member developing the condition and because of the worry that they might develop it themselves. The final point is that there are hundreds of types of cancer. The hypothesis is that some of these are more likely to have an inflammatory component to their pathophysiology than others. So it would very much depend on which type of cancer it was. And even then there would be a lot of doubt. What has been unequivocally proven by scientists in a lab is that Parry is indeed a bell end! 😁 Don't need a lab to confirm it! He's a bit of a climate change denier too. Like most he says things folk will agree with and stuff they won't. He just gets a bit shouty though which makes him a bell.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.