Howardroark

Solicitor is

We aren’t linked to Khiliji

I don’t know

I believed it to be my consortium due to the stated ‘stake in a high level football club’.

They ‘somebody else’ has never asked a question before nor been involved in this forum. I had answered the question previously also.

I disagree entirely, it’s staff wages for 6 months. I don’t believe that the success of an individual (in terms of fiscal position) should mean they are expected to take financial gambles that others would not. I’d be disappointed as we all would, but there are only so many times a business can go down this road, I personally believe a full reset can work well and deliver a more sustainable, fan driven future.

I am also fairly busy with my other client- Mr Assad of Damascus, Syria.

I assume everybody’s purpose is to further their own interests and fire their own passions.

£2M shouldn’t be bandied around like it’s insignificant, it’s £2M more than the club is worth. The blame would continue to land solely at the feet of KA.

You need to delete some first

So ask them directly

It doesn’t take much of a brain to understand the semantics of his question, so please don’t try and skew context to suit your purpose.

Is the question relevant to the current position? Is the question about which court relevant to the current position?

Look, if they are able to obtain the business then great, if they can’t then so be it. There is no desperation to acquire, so it plays out how it plays out.

Most cases under NDA are requested to be held in private chambers, especially if it can materially affect the value or outcome of an ongoing transaction or public concern. FOI being freedom of information act, and that doesn’t unfortunately cover me being able to release information to you. I might also suggest your reasons are somewhat nefarious and you are simply one of many posters here who seek to discredit

Unlikely

It was asked but not answered yet

KA dropping his terms would be to attract a new bidder, if that’s the case then they have a max 7 day period, is anybody going to commit the funds to due diligence under such a short time frame?

Yes Don’t discount Benny’s guys though

Ken wants the Bassini deal, until that’s an impossibility nobody is even close.

Lesser of two evils, he gets paid either way, but one way is a lot more intrusive than the other.

The hearing was held in chamber to stop it being recorded by the media or public. It is only reported by the chamber notary and even then it is with names redacted. You would need to know the court in which the chamber sat to gain access and that would be under an FOI request.

Well yes, but it’s still not enough as it’s an option, not a certainty. Hilary has a much bigger job than last time.

It’s total nonsense, he has accepted a bid as per his notes today.

They won’t accept it, the share recall remains optional and the identity is covered by the same NDA as last time, advice was sought on this earlier today.