January 17, 200620 yr http://home.skysports.com/transfernews.asp...ticle&id=354000 i like this guy as a player, always scores at the reebok too. wouldnt mind him at the fortress!!!
January 17, 200620 yr He does score against us but i feel he is to hit and miss and would not have the work ethic needed!!!
January 17, 200620 yr I think it would be too much like borgetti situation and he would get frustrated at the lack of opportunity if he came to the reebok.
January 17, 200620 yr You heard gayness this is a football forum not for slagging people off, your rumour mill isnt even a rumour its your opinion shot down!!!
January 17, 200620 yr I`d rather stand in a bucket of shit than have that Tosser at the Reebok. It isnt going to happen FACT Why would we want him? Explain.
January 17, 200620 yr You heard gayness this is a football forum not for slagging people off, your rumour mill isnt even a rumour its your opinion shot down!!! :-s
January 17, 200620 yr Author I`d rather stand in a bucket of shit than have that Tosser at the Reebok. It isnt going to happen FACT Why would we want him? Explain. GOALS?? why else would any club sign a striker? #-o
January 17, 200620 yr Quality player if not managed by a complete prick. Not a chance we'd afford him though.
January 17, 200620 yr Author Private joke sorry It's ok, he's my cousin, i know what he's like - going slightly insane! think it was aimed at me too wasn't it mate ?
January 17, 200620 yr I`d rather stand in a bucket of shit than have that Tosser at the Reebok. It isnt going to happen FACT Why would we want him? Explain. GOALS?? why else would any club sign a striker? #-o Yeah like he`s prolific is`nt he. You dont seem to understand the question "Why would WE want him?" What would he bring to our team? Nothing, he is`nt very good IMO, he`s a mard arse who is uaually on the bench whinging. Ive not looked at his stats cos ive got better things to do, but what I do know is 18 starts 2 goals [-X
January 17, 200620 yr I`d rather stand in a bucket of shit than have that Tosser at the Reebok. It isnt going to happen FACT Why would we want him? Explain. GOALS?? why else would any club sign a striker? #-o Yeah like he`s prolific is`nt he. You dont seem to understand the question "Why would WE want him?" What would he bring to our team? Nothing, he is`nt very good IMO, he`s a mard arse who is uaually on the bench whinging. Ive not looked at his stats cos ive got better things to do, but what I do know is 18 starts 2 goals [-X That means fook all; Davies has scored 2 in 19 starts...
January 17, 200620 yr I`d rather stand in a bucket of shit than have that Tosser at the Reebok. It isnt going to happen FACT Why would we want him? Explain. GOALS?? why else would any club sign a striker? #-o Yeah like he`s prolific is`nt he. You dont seem to understand the question "Why would WE want him?" What would he bring to our team? Nothing, he is`nt very good IMO, he`s a mard arse who is uaually on the bench whinging. Ive not looked at his stats cos ive got better things to do, but what I do know is 18 starts 2 goals [-X That means fook all; Davies has scored 2 in 19 starts... Jules, we all know how many kev`s scored, his role up front is slightly different than most forwards. Juan Pablo would not do the sort of job Kev does. Christ sake everytime a forward gets mentioned, ooh we`ll have him...and we end up discussing the same old shite. Davies is Sams no.1 man. End off
January 17, 200620 yr Agree with your sentiments about Kev; all I'm saying is don't judge anyone on stats alone. I actually rate Angel and think he could play as one of our sliding front 3 (with Kev) more effectively than the Borg who IMO is a more out and out striker...however, it aint gonna happen.
January 17, 200620 yr I think he would be a good signing, could play the striker role for us definateley
http://home.skysports.com/transfernews.asp...ticle&id=354000
i like this guy as a player, always scores at the reebok too.
wouldnt mind him at the fortress!!!