then what?

 

you know who you are

 

explain it to the hard of understanding....me

 

 

if thats too difficult, you can try

 

 

gartside out?......then what

 

either one, i'm not fussed

Edited October 25, 200718 yr by Casino

Then get in someone competent

Gartside & the board are responsible for the running of the club. They're making a fist of it. Megson is unlikely to take us to the next level, they want to do everything on the cheap, they're alienating the fans (crowds small enough this season!) and people are generally disillusioned. Need to freshen things up and get a board and chairman who treat the fans with some level of decency. Gartside only in it for himself and only interested in greasing palms at the FA.

Gartside & the board are responsible for the running of the club. They're making a fist of it. Megson is unlikely to take us to the next level, they want to do everything on the cheap, they're alienating the fans (crowds small enough this season!) and people are generally disillusioned. Need to freshen things up and get a board and chairman who treat the fans with some level of decency. Gartside only in it for himself and only interested in greasing palms at the FA.

Of course they are doing it on the cheap. What do you expect with crowds of ten fecking thousand. If more people attended instead of frigging moaning, we may be able to attract a better class of manager

 

feck me, Ive just checked the Leicester web site. Considering they apparently all wanted rid og megson, every home game this season has attracted a bigger crowd than we managed against chelsea. It is not our board that has no ambition - it is our supporters

Edited October 25, 200718 yr by bwfc2003

Of course they are doing it on the cheap. What do you expect with crowds of ten fecking thousand. If more people attended instead of frigging moaning, we may be able to attract a better class of manager

When we had a good manager, we got good crowds (relatively)

When we had a good manager, we got good crowds (relatively)

 

relative to what

 

not fcuking relative to the teams idiots think we should be challenging

 

 

when you grow up, you'll learn

 

what comes in has to pay for what goes out

 

when what goes out is more than what comes in, you have a problem

 

currently, more is going out than is coming in - scandalous tbh, but thats the way it is

 

 

that is much more likely to be the fault of the owner rather than the board

 

now i'd prefer your 'venomous' crew didn't start on the owner, but i'd argue he's at least as much to blame - if there is any blame - as the board and chairman

When we had a good manager, we got good crowds (relatively)

Bollocks- when we had our purple patch under sam, you could still spot hundreds of empty seats at the reebok. a town the size of Bolton, with a ground as small as the Reebok, it is disgraceful it has only been full for a handfull of matches

One person giving it 'sack the board' outside the ground was wearing jogging bottoms.

I'm not getting into a football debate with someone who can't be arsed getting dressed properly.

I rest my case!

relative to what

To what we're getting now, obviously..... although don't let that stop you arguing against something I didn't say

currently, more is going out than is coming in

 

How do you work that out?

Bollocks- when we had our purple patch under sam, you could still spot hundreds of empty seats at the reebok. a town the size of Bolton, with a ground as small as the Reebok, it is disgraceful it has only been full for a handfull of matches

Hence the 'relatively' in my comment

 

Hundreds of empty seats, as opposed to 17,000

 

We got far better under Sam than we're getting now

How do you work that out?

 

 

the next accounts will show we are losing money (yatesy will be along soon to remind me accountants can do owt with numbers )

 

we made balls all of nothing last year, however they dressed it up

Hence the 'relatively' in my comment

 

Hundreds of empty seats, as opposed to 17,000

 

We got far better under Sam than we're getting now

And we filled the reebok for our last eufa campaign did we??

the next accounts will show we are losing money (yatesy will be along soon to remind me accountants can do owt with numbers )

 

we made balls all of nothing last year, however they dressed it up

Where's the MASSIVE increase in TV money gone though? We spent nowt in Summer

How do you work that out?

I would think it obvious with our current attendances

Cant see how we are losing money after spending hardly anything on transfers and gaining the extra money from sky.

And we filled the reebok for our last eufa campaign did we??

You really don't get this 'relatively' thing do you? The point is we got a lot closer to filling it

Cant see how we are losing money after spending hardly anything on transfers and gaining the extra money from sky.

well I dont think Anelka, Diuff etc are on minimum wages

well I dont think Anelka, Diuff etc are on minimum wages

A ?20 million increase on last season?

Diouf will be on the same wage as last year. Anelka will be on slightly more.

 

Wage bill will be a million or two bigger than last season.

Diouf will be on the same wage as last year. Anelka will be on slightly more.

 

Wage bill will be a million or two bigger than last season.

Exactly. So where's the money gone?

i THINK the tv deal is worth an extra 10 million to us

 

and we don't get it until the end of the season

Have you read anything? I was saying the same thing.

If thats the case, we will lose money this financial year, but not this season.

If thats the case, we will lose money this financial year, but not this season.

the upshot is , if we want premier league football, 25000 of us have to get off our arses and get to the reebok every home game, and SUPPORT the team

If thats the case, we will lose money this financial year, but not this season.

 

but this season, we've added numbers to the squad, a couple - at least - million a year types, season tickets down by 4 thou (another million+) add a few improved longer term deals (hunt, davies i seem to rememeber) another million to anelka no doubt

 

jussi wants a bit more - everybody it seems, wants to give it him

 

the rest of the anelka fee, 4 million?

 

look, i'm not here to try to justify where it all goes, the fact is it goes

 

it might be going to eddie davis, i really don't know

 

but gartside can only work with what he's got

Edited October 25, 200718 yr by Casino