December 31, 200916 yr Howsabout we do it then? All it needs is more of us than them The powers-that-be read this shit, we needn't bother
January 1, 201016 yr Sadly, yes. I'm not really keen on fans being interviewed on SKY, but I don't ever want the BWSA to speak for me. I explained who I was/we were and they said they preferred to speak with an "official organisation". I told them about how many members we had: they said they'd check us out and possibly come back to me! We'll not hear from them, once they've checked us out! And I was all set to go "global" wearing a Nat Lofthouse t-shirt! So thats why whenever Bolton fans get interviewed they make us look like twats. We are gonna get another 2nd rate manager arent we?
January 1, 201016 yr Sadly, yes. I'm not really keen on fans being interviewed on SKY, but I don't ever want the BWSA to speak for me. I explained who I was/we were and they said they preferred to speak with an "official organisation". I told them about how many members we had: they said they'd check us out and possibly come back to me! We'll not hear from them, once they've checked us out! And I was all set to go "global" wearing a Nat Lofthouse t-shirt! Happy New Year Traf. John Thomas aka OllyReedHangover wishes you a good un. Why wouldn't anyone seek the views of a non official organisation is beyond me
January 1, 201016 yr Maybe they think anything 'unofficial' is beyond reproach if Traf goes on and starts effin and jeffin to camera.
January 1, 201016 yr Maybe they think anything 'unofficial' is beyond reproach if Traf goes on and starts effin and jeffin to camera. I'm an educated man, and I know what kind of language is fucking appropriate. ::
January 1, 201016 yr I'd have done it. I'm local, can scrub pretty well (apparently) & as you all know, my diplomatic skills are excellent as well as my command of the English language!
January 1, 201016 yr I think most on here could have done a job; as long as they don't ask for views on refs.
January 1, 201016 yr Sadly, yes. I'm not really keen on fans being interviewed on SKY, but I don't ever want the BWSA to speak for me. I explained who I was/we were and they said they preferred to speak with an "official organisation". I told them about how many members we had: they said they'd check us out and possibly come back to me! We'll not hear from them, once they've checked us out! And I was all set to go "global" wearing a Nat Lofthouse t-shirt! I may be wrong but I'm sure they've had that KUMB lot from West Ham on .
January 1, 201016 yr I may be wrong but I'm sure they've had that KUMB lot from West Ham on . They probably have, but they preferred the official mob.
January 1, 201016 yr I may be wrong but I'm sure they've had that KUMB lot from West Ham on . They won the World cup & they're Southerners, different rules I think Undies.
January 1, 201016 yr I'm an educated man, and I know what kind of language is fucking appropriate. :::: It'd be like the flag all over again! Traf, if you get on please could you try and say Clackervalve or offer your opinion on the referee for Saturday! SSN - So, there we have Traf from WW giving his opinion on Megson's sacking. One final thing, what about the ref you've got on Saturday? Traf - He's a . . . he's a . . . he's . . . actually, I'd prefer not to comment on that if you don't mind.
January 1, 201016 yr The actual answer would be: "I don't think he's any better or any worse than the others. They all possess similar qualities."
January 1, 201016 yr The actual answer would be: "I don't think he's any better or any worse than the others. They all possess similar qualities." And I'd play the part of the token nobhead in the background, shouting "He's a cunt!"
January 1, 201016 yr You'd probably have to dress down for the occasion or borrow some apparel from your former employer.
January 1, 201016 yr The actual answer would be: "I don't think he's any better or any worse than the others. They all possess similar qualities." Not challenging your command of English, Traf, but the word you're looking for might be 'characteristics'. 'qualities' is far too positive.
January 1, 201016 yr A quality (derived from Latin: qualitas is an attribute. It can be negative & positive. Obviously I'd be using it in a negative way.
The fans would be behind the appointment of Peter Reid?! Really?