http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-1236978,00.html

http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-1236978,00.html

 

looks like an acsedent from first look

looks familiar, in a very bad way, but, still, looks like an accident.

 

of course today is 11/10

 

5 years ago it was 11/9

 

be in a bungalow on 11/11/2011

Turns out it was a top baseball player.

Turns out it was a top baseball player.

 

Strange that the building has managed to stay perfectly intact..........

Edited October 12, 200619 yr by kent_white

I think perhaps a light aircraft carrying 2 people and a fully fuelled boeing carrying 300 doing 350mph would cause different degrees of damage to a building.

I think perhaps a light aircraft carrying 2 people and a fully fuelled boeing carrying 300 doing 350mph would cause different degrees of damage to a building.

 

You know what lennie i think you may be right!

What's the melting point of steel again?

I think perhaps a light aircraft carrying 2 people and a fully fuelled boeing carrying 300 doing 350mph would cause different degrees of damage to a building.

 

But of course! How could I have been so stupid?

But of course! How could I have been so stupid?

 

you can't help it, its instinctive!

you can't help it, its instinctive!

 

Now now. Don't get your lederhosen in a twist!