How can you throw away a 2-0 lead against 10 men?

 

He just should fu.ck off!

 

We're all but down now. I think people should not to go the game until Megson has been sacked.

Edited March 29, 200818 yr by xxxxxx

is as much the players as it is the manager in that kind of situation, but I agree, he shouldn't be in charge at the start of next season

is as much the players as it is the manager in that kind of situation, but I agree, he shouldn't be in charge at the start of next season

 

Fcuk em all, no heart, no confidence and tactically inept! It appears that half our players have already got one foot out of the door...cnuts

If we had won today you would have been saying that Megson was a tactical genius!

 

It is not his fault that we lost today! If the 11 retards on the pitch cannot hold a 2 - 0 lead with 30 minutes to go against 10 men then they do not deserve to be in the Premiership!

 

 

Edited March 29, 200818 yr by dunster999

If we had won today you would have been saying that Megson was a tactical genius!

No, I would have said that's a nice treat on the way to relegation because that wouldn't have been repeated next week. But they all bottled it.

 

It is not his fault that we lost today! If the 11 retards on the pitch cannot hold a 2 - 0 lead with 30 minutes to go against 10 men then they do not deserve to be in the Premiership!

It's partly the players' fault, but who's that figure playing with the weird substitutions ?

 

Otherwise you're quite right.

No, I would have said that's a nice treat on the way to relegation because that wouldn't have been repeated next week. But they all bottled it.

It's partly the players' fault, but who's that figure playing with the weird substitutions ?

 

Otherwise you're quite right.

 

 

What weird sustitutions?

 

Taking Guthrie off because he runs around like a headless chicken all f?cking game?

 

Or bringing a Striker on to try and win the game when at 2 - 2?

Edited March 29, 200818 yr by dunster999

What weird sustitutions?

 

Taking Guthrie off because he runs around like a headless chicken all f?cking game?

 

Or bringing a Striker on to try and win the game when at 2 - 2?

 

You class putting Nicky Hunt on as a right winger as normal?

What weird sustitutions?

 

Taking Guthrie off because he runs around like a headless chicken all f?cking game?

 

Or bringing a Striker on to try and win the game when at 2 - 2?

 

And Rasiak's a striker ?

 

And taking Diouf off ?

Ah, I should learn not to bite at the first bait.

And Rasiak's a striker ?

 

And taking Diouf off ?

 

 

 

Yes Rasiak is a striker. Like it or Lump it.

 

Diouf had been booked looked to be getting a little wound up. So I think he took him off before he was sent off.

Yes Rasiak is a striker. Like it or Lump it.

 

Diouf had been booked looked to be getting a little wound up. So I think he took him off before he was sent off.

 

 

I remember soon after sammy Lee was sacked, we went for Steve Bruce, he would have been a better bet than this clown Megson.

 

Beer swiller

I remember soon after sammy Lee was sacked, we went for Steve Bruce, he would have been a better bet than this clown Megson.

 

Beer swiller

 

Wigan paid ?3 million for him.

 

Enough said...

Wigan paid ?3 million for him.

 

Enough said...

indeed, Sammy Lee was a cheap option and so was Megson. Unfortunately, if/when we get relegated, we'll probably stick with Megson.......or get rid of him and replace him with yet another cheap option

Wigan paid ?3 million for him.

 

Enough said...

 

and 5 for marlon king

 

he was dropped today

 

if you chuck enough shit, some sticks

Yes Rasiak is a striker. Like it or Lump it.

 

Diouf had been booked looked to be getting a little wound up. So I think he took him off before he was sent off.

 

Give o'er !

Rasiak is never a Prem striker in a million years. I see better in the North-West Counties League.

Diouf had settled down after that incident with van Persie, who was clearly goading him (I was 10 yeards away). He's a valuable attacking player for us. Replace Diouf & Guthrie with Hunt & Stelios ? That's weird - and that's being kind.

stelios replaced diouf, no problem with that

 

hunt replaced the ineffective - though hard working - tiring guthrie*

 

i think he'd have brought on ronaldo, in an ideal world

 

* megson said he shouldn't have had to do it as we were facing 10, but we were being overrun

 

anybody disagree with that?

Edited March 29, 200818 yr by Casino

Wouldn't disagree, but McCann and Campo couldn't run either, the kid was still taking the game to them and running with it, giving the gippers a break. Once he'd gone it got worse

stelios replaced diouf, no problem with that

 

hunt replaced the ineffective - though hard working - tiring guthrie*

 

i think he'd have brought on ronaldo, in an ideal world

 

* megson said he shouldn't have had to do it as we were facing 10, but we were being overrun

 

anybody disagree with that?

 

I agree with that, however i've had it with the board now.... fcukin 2 nil up v 10 men, we should see the game home

 

fkin disgrace

Wigan paid ?3 million for him.

 

Enough said...

40million - 3million = 37 million = not bad business

stelios replaced diouf, no problem with that

 

hunt replaced the ineffective - though hard working - tiring guthrie*

 

i think he'd have brought on ronaldo, in an ideal world

 

* megson said he shouldn't have had to do it as we were facing 10, but we were being overrun

 

anybody disagree with that?

 

 

i disagree with the subs.

 

stelios for diouff, why ? ehd was an outlet and capable of providing something.

 

a right back for a midfield player ?

 

keep diouf on and replace guthrie with stelios......

 

 

we were 2 up against ten men and lost......one manager made changes to win a game megson did nt.

 

that is the biggest fact of 2008.