August 14, 200718 yr Here are the final results across all three forums: Current badge = 17% Previous badge = 42% 1950's badge = 25% 1960's badge = 4% New design = 12%
August 15, 200718 yr what a set of bitches fcuk me i am grumpy today Excuse me, nothing bitchy about it. I stated an honest opinion on what appears to be busier, no facts behind it, just a feeling, The point about the poll, as IQ58 knows only too well, is that anyone looking at the figures will question how the WW poll is so severely skewed towards the old badge? Edited August 15, 200718 yr by Casino
August 15, 200718 yr May have something to do with us being stuck in the 80s All the more reason to not vote for that badge then
August 15, 200718 yr Excuse me, nothing bitchy about it. I stated an honest opinion on what appears to be busier, no facts behind it, just a feeling, The point about the poll, as IQ58 knows only too well, is that anyone looking at the figures will question how the WW poll is so severely skewed towards the old badge? not so much you- but reading through it defo some squabbling going on Edited August 15, 200718 yr by Casino
August 15, 200718 yr anyone looking at the figures will question how the WW poll is so severely skewed towards the old badge? Because the majority of folk on WWays prefer it? Just a thought like.
August 15, 200718 yr Author Excuse me, nothing bitchy about it. I stated an honest opinion on what appears to be busier, no facts behind it, just a feeling, The point about the poll, as IQ58 knows only too well, is that anyone looking at the figures will question how the WW poll is so severely skewed towards the old badge? It's only a poll about a f**king badge! Get a life you sad tw*t!
August 15, 200718 yr Because the majority of folk on WWays prefer it? Just a thought like. fair enough, just seems peculiar, anyway as IQ58 says, it's irrelevant and pointless anyway. Let's just leave it.
August 15, 200718 yr Author fair enough, just seems peculiar, anyway as IQ58 says, it's irrelevant and pointless anyway. Let's just leave it. You're irrelevant and pointless. F**k off back to The Wanderer.
August 15, 200718 yr fair enough, just seems peculiar, anyway as IQ58 says, it's irrelevant and pointless anyway. Let's just leave it. Leave it? I'm a woman, it's not in my nature. You didn't say 'perculiar' on TW, you said 'compromised', so maybe a little humble pie would be in order or back up your claims, please. And if the club do use these polls, then it's not irrelevant or pointless.
August 16, 200718 yr fair enough, just seems peculiar, anyway as IQ58 says, it's irrelevant and pointless anyway. Let's just leave it. are we not worth it?
August 16, 200718 yr i like this post about wways being busier than the-wanderer... I have been reading this thread with interest. The emblem we all seem to prefer is tattooed on my arm. The only other one I considered was the 58 cup winners badge. The poncey fooking tripe with the ribbons sounds like it's just about right for the 'intellectually superior' types who frequent The Wanderer (their words not mine). I have a vision of Fathead and his chums in tweed jackets with leather elbow patches; w@nking over Edwina Curry.
August 16, 200718 yr Author I have a vision of Fathead and his chums in tweed jackets with leather elbow patches; w@nking over Edwina Curry. Now if ever there was a line that was just begging to be used as a signature...
August 16, 200718 yr fair enough, just seems peculiar, anyway as IQ58 says, it's irrelevant and pointless anyway. Let's just leave it. Here's one for you; if you don't produce proof that the WW vote was rigged, as you claimed on TW, I'm going to delete you. Over to you...
August 16, 200718 yr Here's one for you; if you don't produce proof that the WW vote was rigged, as you claimed on TW, I'm going to delete you. Over to you... Carlos, I've claimed nothing of the sort, I said it looked compromised, when IQ58 started his rant, I clarified to him that I meant it could have been hijacked. I don't care one way or the other, but if your looking at statistical evidence objectively, you would look at the results and suspect someone has multi-accounted to get a result they want. The trouble is the sample sizes from all three are statistically too small to be conclusive one way or the other. I was passing comment on the poll, not on the morals or honesty of this site's webmaster(s).
August 16, 200718 yr i like this post about wways being busier than the-wanderer... I agree - it was much busier but somewhat less intellectual(!) than TW when last I visited. And, sadly, if someone comes to a football board for intellectual discussion then it indicates a lack of cerebral stimulus elsewhere in their life. Now, my brain gets a jolly old work-out down at the chess club, the Wittgenstein debating society and for relaxation, feeling pleased that we finally knocked Fermat's Last Theorem on the head. I come here for amusement and football.
August 16, 200718 yr Carlos, I've claimed nothing of the sort, I said it looked compromised, when IQ58 started his rant, I clarified to him that I meant it could have been hijacked. I don't care one way or the other, but if your looking at statistical evidence objectively, you would look at the results and suspect someone has multi-accounted to get a result they want. The trouble is the sample sizes from all three are statistically too small to be conclusive one way or the other. I was passing comment on the poll, not on the morals or honesty of this site's webmaster(s). And if you think that anyone on here could be arsed to do that in a poll about a bloody stupid badge, then you're way off-beam, chummy.
August 16, 200718 yr Hang about, "I'm just stating the bleeding obvious, that the WW poll has been hijacked" is a bit more strongly worded than implying that it could have been compromised. I personally don't think that anyone cares strongly enough about the issue to go registering new accounds to skew the poll. I also think that it accurately reflects the demographic range of posters on WW and other sites, posters on other sites may not even remember the older badges. Surely that's obvious? If you want to question the integrity of this site, you do it on this site and this site alone. If you want to shit stir, you can f?ck off back to The Wanderer or wherever you've come from.
August 16, 200718 yr And if you think that anyone on here could be arsed to do that in a poll about a bloody stupid badge, then you're way off-beam, chummy. Fattyshafter seems a bit obsessed with it
Here are the final results across all three forums:
Current badge = 17%
Previous badge = 42%
1950's badge = 25%
1960's badge = 4%
New design = 12%