Ooooooh just short of slip what the fuck ave we had for lunch!!!

Just short

That my friend, is a jaffa. Too good for Clark.

Some feckin brave leaves recently.

What was the noise?

Survived the review

we've had some ambitious claims to be fair

 

 

well none left so, just have to bowl the feckers out!!!

we've had some ambitious claims to be fair

 

There was a big noise first time round, still not sure what it was though.

There was a big noise first time round, still not sure what it was though.

 

 

yes, didn't mean that one

Clark plays and misses again...

Really good spell of bowling this, c'mon chaps

Snicko looks awfully like it's calling an edge. Why aren't they using that on the review system if it's available for TV?

Snicko showing some type of noise there.

Snicko looks awfully like it's calling an edge. Why aren't they using that on the review system if it's available for TV?

 

Supposidly it takes too long to produce it.

who decides on the technology they use/dont use

I know they're a bit backwards out there but that's taking the michael - it works perfectly well for referrals in England.

Snicko looks awfully like it's calling an edge. Why aren't they using that on the review system if it's available for TV?

 

 

steady on lads, umpires will be redundant if you carry on like that

steady on lads, umpires will be redundant if you carry on like that

 

We'll always need someone to maintain and operate the computers.

steady on lads, umpires will be redundant if you carry on like that

 

 

I wasnt a fan of the referral system for the reason of undermimening the umpires but its not often they are over turned tbf

i like the human error element though

i like the human error element though

 

Im same

I know they're a bit backwards out there but that's taking the michael - it works perfectly well for referrals in England.

 

To be fair they've never used snicko for any referrals.

i like the human error element though

 

Depends which way it goes.

 

The current system is farsical. In the morning session we had a ball given out and overturned, then a ball not give out and not overturned, although had it been give out it would have remained out - I understand what they're trying to do, but it ends up as a dogs dinner - either use technology to get the best decisions possible, or don't.

Depends which way it goes.

 

The current system is farsical. In the morning session we had a ball given out and overturned, then a ball not give out and not overturned, although had it been give out it would have remained out - I understand what they're trying to do, but it ends up as a dogs dinner - either use technology to get the best decisions possible, or don't.

 

 

farcical/ dogs dinners a bit strong, but know what you're saying.

 

they are getting most things right between em